His Dear Bedfellow – The debate over Harry Percy

Posted By on January 28, 2016

Henry Percy 6th Earl of Northumberland My dear friend, historian and author Gareth Russell, has written an article for Tudor Life magazine which I know will be of real interest to Anne Boleyn Files followers and which you can all read as it’s part of the teaser/taster of the February magazine, available at https://www.tudorsociety.com/tudor-life-february-2016-taster/.

Now, most of us are very well aware of the controversial theory put forward by historian Retha M. Warnicke, and publicised in novels like The Other Boleyn Girl, regarding Anne Boleyn being surrounded by a circle of homosexual men, but, as Gareth states in his article “His Dear Bedfellow – The debate over Harry Percy”, “Less well-known is the theory that Anne Boleyn’s most famous early love interest, Lord Henry Percy, later 6th Earl of Northumberland, might also have been involved in an homosexual relationship with Catherine Howard’s future brother-in-law, Sir Thomas Arundell.” Gareth talks us through the ‘evidence’ that is used to back up this theory, which comes down really to the use of one word. Don’t you just wish that those Tudors could have clarified what they meant?!

I had never come across this theory so I found the article an interesting read.

3 thoughts on “His Dear Bedfellow – The debate over Harry Percy”

  1. Banditqueen says:

    Interesting article by Garath Russell but I agree loans of money and sharing a bed are not enough evidence of homosexuality. Everyone shared rooms and beds, it was not unusual. I would need more evidence than that to make such a judgment as to a historic person’s sexual preference.

  2. Camille Dvorak says:

    500 years on, what difference can it possibly matter?

    1. Banditqueen says:

      It’s about evidence. For historians it’s not about if someone had a dodgy sex life or not, but about what original sources say and what evidence there is. Owing someone money or sharing a room or even a bed in the sixteenth century was not proof of homosexuality. People read too much into small things, finding evidence which isn’t there.

Please note: Comment moderation is currently enabled so there will be a delay between when you post your comment and when it shows up.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.