Rose Lok’s Tale by Lissa Chapman

Posted By on March 9, 2017

Woman thought to be Rose Lok

Thank you to Lissa Chapman, author of Anne Boleyn in London, for sharing this guest article with us today.

Rose Lok lived to be a very old lady. For a Londoner born in the reign of Henry VIII, to attain the age of eighty-six was in itself an extraordinary achievement. And Rose lived an extraordinary life. She grew up in a house off Cheapside in the heart of Tudor London, one of nineteen children of the king’s own mercer, William Lok. One of her early memories was of the king inviting himself to dinner. And her later life included not only marriage and children but religious persecution and exile. In her final years, she was to write a memoir for her grandchildren.

William Lok was a highly regarded mercer who supplied Henry VIII with the latest and most exclusive in of high-end fabrics and trimmings. All through Rose’s childhood, the family was high in the Royal favour. In 1527, the year after Rose was born, William was granted exclusive rights to import fabric for court revels – a lucrative acquisition, as the “revels” often took the form of lavishly produced events somewhere between a musical and a drunken party, with specially commissioned costumes and props costing the equivalent of hundreds of thousands of pounds. This was in addition to the money he made in a variety of forms of international trade, including importing wine and exporting beer and leather goods. And the Lok family had been high in the Royal favour for many years; there are records going back to 1498 of purchases from them by Elizabeth of York.

The Lok household in Bow Lane must have been crowded. William married four times, but his nineteen children, of whom twelve survived to adulthood, were all born to his first two wives – the second of whom, Rose’s mother Katherine Cooke, died soon after the birth of her tenth child. The death of a baby or small child was nothing unusual at this time: according to one estimate, two out of five of all those born did not live to see their fifth birthday. And many people approached marriage with pragmatism. It was common for both women and men to marry several times, often seeking a new partner within weeks of being widowed. William Lok’s third and fourth wives were both widows who had been married twice before – their much-married husband probably felt the need for a wife to preside over his children and houses.

So even by Tudor standards, the Lok family was extensive, as was its influence. By the time of his death, William Lok owned twelve properties in London as well as land and farms in the home counties. Most of the men of the extended family became mercers, and several Lok daughters married other members of the craft. And the daughters also worked as silk women. At this time it was both acceptable and usual for the women of high-status City families to work. In the case of the Loks, and other mercers, this was in the silk trade. There were as yet no silk weavers in England, but raw silk was imported into the country, and was made up into ribbons and trimmings by silk women, who would also sell the finished goods to rich and influential customers. This involved having the entrée to Court, and to be one of the accredited silk women to the queen of the day was a coveted status – and one which in turn conferred privileged access, and with it the capacity to form an insider view about the queen and her household.

Rose was to claim in her memoir that her father was importing French religious books for Anne Boleyn and her father and brother by the late 1520s. The whole Lok family were interested and involved in the reform movement from its earliest days, long before it was legal to possess a copy of the Bible in English, or French either. As with so much else, if you were of high enough status, it was safe to bend the rules – and the queen-in-waiting could do no wrong. William Lok’s stock rose even higher in 1533 when, on a trip to Dunkirk, he dramatically tore down from the church door a poster proclaiming that the Pope had excommunicated King Henry VIII for refusing to take back Catherine of Aragon as his wife. When this story of loyalty in action reached the king’s ears, it meant a court appointment as gentleman usher and a cash reward for William – and the king started to invite himself to dinner in Bow Lane

William Lok was by no means the first Londoner to find himself entertaining Henry VIII unexpectedly. Ever since he escaped his father’s tutelage when he became king at just short of eighteen, Henry VIII had delighted in moving around London semi-unnoticed. Sometimes this took the form of a set-piece entertainment such as when the king and a dozen courtiers turned up in disguise at a party at Wolsey’s London palace. All the guests knew to join in the game that dictated that everyone was speculating about the identity of the magnificent man in the mask, only to be duly amazed when he revealed himself. Sometimes the expedition was less graceful, such as the forays through London arranged by the king’s friend and groom of the stool, William Compton, who was also expected to arrange for pretty and accommodating girls to be available to the king at his own London home. And on yet other occasions the mood was that of the friendly and informal sovereign who asked nothing better than to sit down to an impromptu meal with a loyal servant and his family. Alas, that Rose did not record in her memoir any details of the visits – although, as a small girl, she may not have been present for much of the time.

What is clear is that William Lok’s London business was extensive. As mercer to both the king and to Anne Boleyn, he was evidently required not only to supply fabric but to arrange for it to be made into clothes. This is suggested by the large bill that was left unpaid at the time of Anne Boleyn’s death. It was usual in the sixteenth century for the nobility to pay for goods several months in arrears, and the queen was evidently no exception. In the period between the beginning of January and 27th April 1536, Anne had bought goods priced at £124 15s 2d (multiply by around 500 for some idea of modern values). The itemised list includes a sumptuous range of clothes, from a russet velvet gown trimmed with black lamb’s wool to black velvet nightgowns (to be worn informally rather than in bed) to carnation satin sleeves, thirteen kirtles – under dresses – the fabric for eight pairs of black velvet shoes and a number of items for the Princess Elizabeth. The fact that the bills are for clothes and not just fabric suggests that Lok may well have been involved in the making of the clothes. Some items would certainly have been made by the king’s tailor, but it is also likely that the Loks’ sphere of influence included tailors and seamstresses who did at least some of the cutting and sewing.

Stephen Vaughan, who was a merchant venturer was so keen to persuade Anne Boleyn to employ his wife that he provided some free samples of her work. Those who were appointed as silk women to the queen were expected to visit her and her ladies regularly with the latest in trimmings, ribbons and tassels, some made by themselves and some imported. The silk women were familiar figures and evidently were often on friendly terms with their royal customers – and on hand to see and hear what was happening in their households. Twenty years after Anne’s death, at the beginning of the reign of her daughter, Elizabeth, some of those whose memories went back far enough made haste to place on record their memories of Anne’s household. And the Loks and their circle certainly contributed a share to the recollection of Anne Boleyn as a serious and devout mistress, who ensured her ladies’ behaviour was exemplary, that they sewed for the poor, and that they read and discussed religious texts over their sewing. At this time there was a concerted effort among Protestant Londoners to rehabilitate the reputation of the woman they regarded as having been largely instrumental in bringing about the English Reformation. John Foxe was to quote Joan Wilkinson, another of Anne’s silk women, as a source for the description he includes in his Books of Martyrs of the queen’s charitable activities and the high standards she set for her household.

And it was at this time that Rose Lok and her husband, another mercer, were able to return to London, having prudently moved to Antwerp during the reign of the Catholic Mary I. They had joined several hundred other Protestant Londoners on the far side of the English Channel, aware that their status and prosperity might not save them from the flames of Smithfield. Rose, her husband and children settled back into London life under Elizabeth I – little is known about her subsequent life except that she lived to be a great-grandmother and revered matriarch. And if Rose’s later years were quiet ones, her son William Hickman took on the role of adventurer, travelling to Russia to the court of Ivan the Terrible, and returning safely to tell his mother the story.

Lissa has also written two other articles for us here at The Anne Boleyn Files:

Lissa’s book, Anne Boleyn in London

Romantic victim? Ruthless other woman? Innocent pawn? Religious reformer? Fool, flirt and adulteress? Politician? Witch? During her life, Anne Boleyn, Henry VIII’s ill-fated second queen, was internationally famous – or notorious; today, she still attracts passionate adherents and furious detractors.

It was in London that most of the drama of Anne Boleyn’s life and death was played out – most famously, in the Tower of London, the scene of her coronation celebrations, of her trial and execution, and where her body lies buried. Londoners, like everyone else, clearly had strong feelings about her, and in her few years as a public figure Anne Boleyn was influential as a patron of the arts and of French taste, as the centre of a religious and intellectual circle, and for her purchasing power, both directly and as a leader of fashion. It was primarily to London, beyond the immediate circle of the court, that her carefully ‘spun’ image as queen was directed during the public celebrations surrounding her coronation.

In the centuries since Anne Boleyn’s death, her reputation has expanded to give her an almost mythical status in London, inspiring everything from pub names to music hall songs, and novels to merchandise including pin cushions with removable heads. And now there is a thriving online community surrounding her – there are over fifty Twitter accounts using some version of her name. This book looks at the evidence both for the effect London and its people had on the course of Anne Boleyn’s life and death, and the effects she had, and continues to have, on them.

Hardcover: 248 pages
Publisher: Pen & Sword Books Ltd
Language: English
ISBN-10: 1473843618
ISBN-13: 978-1473843615
Available from Pen & Sword Books, Amazon.com and Amazon UK.

Related Posts

  • No Related Posts Found

11 thoughts on “Rose Lok’s Tale by Lissa Chapman”

  1. Hi Lissa.

    Thank you for a very interesting article about Rose Lok’s early life. We in Lincolnshire, where the portrait hangs in Gainsborough Old Hall, know her as Rose Locke, or more usually, Rose Hickman.

    Actually, her later life was also very colourful, and not without danger, right to the end. Her husband, Anthony Hickman, died in the 1570’s, and because of their tendency towards the Puritans, the family was always sailing close to the wind on religious matters throughout Elizabeth’s reign. The business was not very healthy by the 1590’s either, so in 1596 Rose, her son William and his family purchased Gainsborough Old Hall in Lincolnshire from the Burgh (Borough) family who had been forced to sell to pay off their debts. The Lord Burgh who had lived there in the reign of Henry VIII had been Katherine Parr’s first father-in-law and also chamberlain to Anne Boleyn. Katherine Howard stayed there with Henry in 1541.

    The Old Hall still stands and is one of the finest medieval manor houses in the country, although little-known, sadly, because of it is off the tourist track. It is much as it was in Rose’s time, including the marvellous Great Hall, and kitchens second only to those at Hampton Court.

    The Old Hall in Rose Hickman’s time became a focus for dissenters such as William Brewster, who were allowed to hold meetings there, some of whom would go on to become known as the Pilgrim Fathers.

    1. Lissa Chapman says:

      Many thanks for this, Marillyn. Gainsborough Old Hall has been on my list of places to visit for years, and now I have an additional reason. I encountered Rose and her family when researching the London of the 1520s-40s, and love the fact that here is one of the few women of the time for whom we have an authentic voice. Do you know any details of her brushes with the Elizabethan authorities? As to the spelling of the surname, I took my choice of the variations: I saw at least three different ones in the various sources I consulted!

      1. If you decide to come up let me know through Claire and I’ll take you round, if you wish. Author Sue Allan actually does costumed tours and takes on the character of Rose Hickman.
        The Burgh family is more my period and at the Old Hall “Tudor Queens Day” in May I shall be talking about their connections with the Tudors (the other speakers on the day are Alison Weir on Anne Boleyn, and Nicola Tallis on Lady Jane Grey), so I don’t know very much about Rose.
        Sue Allan’s novel has Rose narrating her life story and deals with Elizabeth’s reign. It’s a bit of a hybrid in that even though a novel, it gives footnotes, but I’m sure as a work of reference it would be useful to you, and there are second-hand copies on Amazon at the moment.
        As for the spelling of the surname, I think it’s a movable feast, and I only mentioned it in case you are looking up any local histories of Lincolnshire.

        1. Lissa Chapman says:

          Thanks, that would be lovely – it sounds like a wonderful house. And good to learn that there is lots going on there.

      2. Dawn 1st says:

        There are times Marilyn l really regret moving so far away from Gainsborough, lol. The Hall never had this type of Living History when l moved away, just your guide book and audio tour. I had no idea this lady had a connection to this place. Glad to hear it’s going from strength to strength though.

        And that was a real interesting and educational article Lissa, thank you

  2. There is a novel “Tudor Rose” by Lincolnshire historian Sue Allan.

  3. Banditqueen says:

    Loved this article about this fascinating and long lived woman. Loved this…the King invited himself to dinner. Keep the larder stocked, you never know if Henry may drop in, no doubt with a few hungry friends in tow. Glove and clothes making was a very fine skill…must have been very high standard to be honoured to provide these for the King and his daughters. Wonderful to read about ordinary but colourful lives of every day business people in London and at court. Enjoyed, thanks.

    1. Lissa Chapman says:

      Very glad you enjoyed the piece – it’s indeed wonderful to have a woman of that writing in her own words and giving her own view of events. I think the whole family must have been quite formidable to dare to have smuggled religious books into the country many years before it was legal to own translations of the Bible.

  4. Christine says:

    I’d like to add Rose seems an unusual name for the 16th century, it seems more in accordance with 18thc parlour maids.

    1. Lissa Chapman says:

      The name was indeed revived in the 18/19C – but there were mediaeval Roses and similar names – the most famous being, of course, Rosamund Clifford, the lover of King Henry II. I suspect, but don’t actually know, that some of the 16C Roses were named for the Tudor Princess Mary Rose, the sister of Henry VIII – and Rose Lok was the right age to have been named after her. Perhaps quite likely in a family with Court connections.

      1. Christine says:

        Yes I was forgetting Rosamund Clifford, thanks Lissa.

Please note: Comment moderation is currently enabled so there will be a delay between when you post your comment and when it shows up.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *