Henry VIII is Excommunicated

Posted By on December 17, 2010

St Thomas Becket Pilgrim Badge

On this day in history, 17th December 1538, Pope Paul III announced that Henry VIII had been excommunicated from the Catholic Church:-

“Bull against Hen. VIII., renewing the execution of the bull of 30 Aug. 1535, which had been suspended in hope of his amendment, as he has since gone to still further excesses, having dug up and burned the bones of St, Thomas of Canterbury and scattered the ashes to the winds, (after calling the saint to judgment, condemning him as contumacious, and proclaiming him a traitor), and spoiled his shrine. He has also spoiled St. Augustine’s monastery in the same city, driven out the monks and put in deer in their place. Publication of this bull may be made in Dieppe or Boulogne in Fiance, or in St. Andrew’s or Coldstream (? “in oppido Calistrensi”), St. Andrew’s dioc., in Scotland, or in Tuam or Ardfert in Ireland, if preferred, instead of the places named in the former bull Rome, Paul III.”1

Henry VIII had already upset the Pope and the Catholic Church by:-

  • Annulling his marriage to Catherine of Aragon and marrying Anne Boleyn
  • Declaring himself “Supreme Head of the Church of England
  • Persecuting those who opposed the Acts of Supremacy and Succession
  • Dissolving the monasteries
  • His handling of the Pilgrimage of Grace

But the final straw was Henry’s attack on religious shrines in England, shrines that contained religious relics and that were visited by many pilgrims. One such shrine was that of St Thomas Becket (Thomas à Becket) in the Trinity Chapel of Catherbury Cathedral, which was seen as one of Europe’s holiest shrines and was therefore a popular destination for pilgrims from all over Europe. In a meeting of the King’s Council on the 24th April 1538 a “Process against St Thomas of Canterbury” was decided:-

“Sentence to the effect that Thomas, formerly archbishop of Canterbury, having been cited, and no one having appeared for him, judgment is given that in his life time he disturbed the realm, and his crimes were the cause of his death, although the people hold him for a martyr. He is therefore never to be named martyr in future, his bones are to be token up and publicly burnt and the treasures of his shrine confiscated to the King. This edict to be published in London, Canterbury, and elsewhere. London, 11 June, 1538.

This sentence pronounced, the King commanded it to be put into execution 11 Aug. The gold and silver of the shrine (says Pollini) filled 26 waggons. On the 19th (St. Bernard’s duy), the sacrilege was completed and the sacred relics publicly burnt and the ashes scattered.”2

One treasure which was purloined by the King from the shrine was the Regale of France, a great ruby which was donated by King Louis VII, and Henry VIII had this made into a thumb ring for himself3.

Such desecration of a place which many pilgrims, and the Catholic Church as a whole, saw as holy could not go unpunished and it was this final act which made Pope Paul III issue the Bull of Excommunication.

Notes and Sources

  • Letters and Papers, Foreign and Domestic, Henry VIII, Volume 13 Part 2. 1087
  • Ibid., 133
  • Canterbury Cathedral, article by Sacred Destination

11 thoughts on “Henry VIII is Excommunicated”

  1. Meghan says:

    Wow! I was wondering about that ring in Season 3 of The Tudors. Thanks!

  2. Anne Barnhill says:

    I didn’t realize Henry did this desecration stuff! WOw! That really was sort of over the top, even for Henry. What a fascinating man—-terrifying but fascinating!

  3. lisaannejane says:

    Something that I never understood is why the title give by the pope of “defender of the faith” is still being used. Has the meaning of this title changed to a Protestant one? It sounds funny to me.

    1. A Brown Guy says:

      i agree

  4. It has been my understanding that for an excommunication to be valid, the letter of excommunication has to be delivered in person to the offensive person. Since there is no evidence that such a letter was ever delivered to good King Henry VIII, it seems reasonable to assume that the great Tudor King died in the faith … receiving the last rites etc.

    1. Margaret Tudor says:

      The excommunication is valid. Henry VIII as far as the Catholic church is concerned died outside of the faith. Morever, his last rites were administered by Thomas Cranmer – also, like Henry, considered a heretic and apostate in the eyes of the Church. Cranmer was not considered a Roman Catholic priest (any longer) and any rites he performed considered invalid – such as Henry’s marriage to Anne.

  5. Henry VIII is the true father of United Kingdom and – it sounds absurd, said by an Italian citizen – also the father of Scientific Method together with Galileo. God save the King (that One)!

    1. larry villa says:

      God will neither save the King or Queen of England or those before them. Christ gave authority to Peter and his Apostles to establish the Catholic Church, St. Peter became the first Pope and the disciples, the first Bishops. Christ did not give Luther or King Henry authority to establish their own churches. They turned their backs on Christ’s only true church and the Pope who he authorized with the power to head his church and the disciples who became the Bishops. The so called “father of Scientific Method” was a womanizer who killed his ex-wives, when the church wouldn’t grant him a divorce to marry another woman, he arrogantly declared himself head of the “church of england”. How arrogant, a heretic who was excommunicated by Christ’s Holy Church, his descendants are not holy and will not save them from hell.

      1. Chris mahon says:

        JEsus Christ died a devout Essene Jew. HIs brother, James became “head of the Church thereafter” and called St Paul back to Jerusalem twice to tell him to stop preaching that Jesus was God, it being anathema in the Jewish faith to claim anyone was a God. PAul being a Roman had no problem with that as many Emperors were declared Gods. PAul invented Christianity basically. WE should really all be Jews.

  6. TudorGirl says:

    Personally, I think that, regardless of anyone’s religious beliefs, there’s something morbid and reprehensible about disturbing and ultimately destroying a dead person’s final resting place and remains. Sad, really.

  7. Jasmine LB says:

    I have just spent about ten minutes trying to get an answer and this really doesn’t help

Please note: Comment moderation is currently enabled so there will be a delay between when you post your comment and when it shows up.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *