• FREE Anne Boleyn Files Welcome Pack of 5 goodies
    sent directly to your inbox Free Tudor Book



    Includes 3 Free Reports, Book List and Primary Sources List Please check your spam box if you don't receive a confirmation email. PLEASE NOTE: Your privacy is essential to us and we will not share your details with anyone.

3 May 1536 – Archbishop Cranmer is “clean amazed”

Posted By on May 3, 2015

Thomas_Cranmer_by_Gerlach_Flicke On 3rd May 1536 Archbishop Cranmer wrote a letter to King Henry VIII expressing his shock at the arrest of Queen Anne Boleyn, a woman who had acted as his patron and who was his friend:

“Have come to Lambeth, according to Mr. Secretary’s letters, to know your Grace’s pleasure. Dare not, contrary to the said letters, presume to come to your presence, but of my bounden duty I beg you “somewhat to suppress the deep sorrows of your Grace’s heart,” and take adversity patiently. Cannot deny that you have great causes of heaviness, and that your honor is highly touched. God never sent you a like trial; but if He find you no less patient and thankful than when all things succeeded to your wish, I suppose you never did thing more acceptable to Him. You will give Him occasion to increase His benefits, as He did to Job.

If the reports of the Queen be true, they are only to her dishonor, not yours. I am clean amazed, for I had never better opinion of woman; but I think your Highness would not have gone so far if she had not been culpable. I was most bound to her of all creatures living, and therefore beg that I may, with your Grace’s favor, wish and pray that she may declare herself innocent. Yet if she be found guilty, I repute him not a faithful subject who would not wish her punished without mercy. “And as I loved her not a little for the love which I judged her to bear towards God and His Gospel, so if she be proved culpable there is not one that loveth God and His Gospel that ever will favor her, but must hate her above all other; and the more they favor the Gospel the more they will hate her, for then there was never creature in our time that so much slandered the Gospel; and God hath sent her this punishment for that she feignedly hath professed his Gospel in her mouth and not in heart and deed.” And though she have so offended, yet God has shown His goodness towards your Grace and never offended you. “But your Grace, I am sure, knowledgeth that you have offended Him.” I trust, therefore, you will bear no less zeal to the Gospel than you did before, as your favor to the Gospel was not led by affection to her. Lambeth, 3 May.

Since writing, my lords Chancellor, Oxford, Sussex, and my Lord Chamberlain of your Grace’s house, sent for me to come to the Star Chamber, and there declared to me such things as you wished to make me privy to. For this I am much bounden to your Grace. They will report our conference. I am sorry such faults can be proved against the Queen as they report.”1

Cranmer must have spent hours working on this letter. He had to balance his defence and support of the queen with his allegiance to the king. Beth von Staats, in her book Thomas Cranmer: In a Nutshell, writes that this letter is evidence of Cranmer’s “political naivety” and that “His first response was to plead to the benevolence of King Henry VIII by composing a letter to him.” She goes on to say that “Though some view the letter’s prose to be a condemnation of his close friend Queen Anne Boleyn, it is actually an example of highly cautious advocacy. Though he could plant a seed of doubt, Cranmer was wise enough to know not to question the king’s decision-making.”2 Cranmer’s biographer Diarmaid MacCulloch writes of how this letter and Cranmer’s handling of the situation show his wisdom and courage, rather than his cowardice as some suggest.3 Cranmer definitely knew how to handle the King and when not to question the King’s actions. Angering the King would not have helped Anne.

Also on 3rd May 1536, Sir William Kingston, Constable of the Tower of London, wrote his first report to Thomas Cromwell regarding Anne Boleyn’s imprisonment in the Tower of London. Click here to read more about this.

Notes and Sources

  1. Letters and Papers, Foreign and Domestic, Henry VIII, Volume 10 – January-June 1536, 792
  2. von Staats, Beth (2015) Thomas Cranmer: In a Nutshell
  3. MacCulloch, Diarmaid (1998) Thomas Cranmer: A Life, 157.

4 thoughts on “3 May 1536 – Archbishop Cranmer is “clean amazed””

  1. Christine says:

    I hope Anne knew that Cranmer had stuck up for her I applaud him for that , he had the courage to write that letter to the king knowing what his state of mind must have been like, and he was the only one to do so, there was of course Norris who maintained both his and Anne’s innocence, I watched The Last Days Of Anne Boleyn last night the third time I’d watched it and they had interviews with Gregory Weir Mantel and Bernard Shaw, Shaw was of the opinion Anne had slept with Norris as their conversation hints at intimacy, I guess we will never know but you can read something in that remark about Dead Mens Shoes, perhaps they were attracted to each other but it was something they had never spoken about, then Anne was feeling reckless one night maybe she’d had bit too much to drink and that’s when the truth comes out, drink does bring out the truth but it always makes you regret your actions when you sober up, I don’t think she slept with anyone as Elizabeth said years later, a Queen is always surrounded by servants but she probably was unfaithful to Henry in her mind, she could have substituted Henry when they in bed together with Smeaton or Norris as they were both good looking, there’s no harm in that as long as you keep it in your mind, maybe she spoke in her sleep? Maybe she called out one of the other men’s names and Henry heard, all these little things add to paranoia, I think it could well have been a sequence of events that just spiralled out of control.

    1. JudithRex says:

      I guess I don’t see him sticking up for her at all. He ended the letter, was called away to be shown some “evidence”and then he dropped her like a hot poker.

  2. BanditQueen says:

    Cranmer must have been caught between his true feelings, to defend the Queen and his duty to the King. Here he shows emphathy with the King and the so called deceit he has suffered by the behaviour of the Queen, but also says that he does not credit that the Queen is guilty. He then confirms as a loyal subject that he believes that Henry is just and would not proceed so against the queen if he did not have evidence against her. He wants to stand by Anne as she is a reformer and chaste and high moral person, she is a patron of the church he supported him; but he also has to show shock and outrage in case it turns out that the Queen really is guilty. He may be sitting on the fence; but he has to balance his true feelings with the shock of recent events.

    1. Christine says:

      Yes that’s true I think Cranmer was very astute he loved Anne but he was in the middle here, he couldn’t say too much for fear of angering Henry but he wanted to speak in her defence which he did, and his words have been recorded, since the court was a hotbed of gossip in the early days of the Queens arrest he must have heard people muttering about her so called affairs, I doubt he believed them himself as his words to Henry show and more than likely knew they were trumped up charges just to get rid of her, Cranmer was loved by Henry too and I think it sad that he ended his days at the stake because of Queen Mary’s vindictiveness, I’d just like to add the picture of Cranmer is so lifelike it looks like a photo, Holbein was a wonderful artist.

Please note: Comment moderation is currently enabled so there will be a delay between when you post your comment and when it shows up.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.