• FREE Anne Boleyn Files Welcome Pack of 5 goodies
    sent directly to your inbox Free Tudor Book



    Includes 3 Free Reports, Book List and Primary Sources List Please check your spam box if you don't receive a confirmation email. PLEASE NOTE: Your privacy is essential to us and we will not share your details with anyone.

18 January 1486 – Marriage of Henry VII and Elizabeth of York

Posted By on January 18, 2012

On the 18th January 1486 Henry VII married Elizabeth of York, uniting the Houses of Lancaster and York and establishing a new royal house: The House of Tudor.

Henry Tudor had become King on the 22nd August 1485 when he defeated Richard III at the Battle of Bosworth. He was crowned King on the 30th October and on the 7th November the English parliament asserted the legitimacy of his claim to the throne and overturned that of Richard III, who had claimed that Edward IV’s children were illegitimate on the grounds that Edward had been pre-contracted to Eleanor Talbot before his marriage to Elizabeth Woodville. By overturning Richard’s claim, parliament made Elizabeth of York, Edward’s daughter, legitimate again.

On the 10th December, the House of Commons petitioned Henry VII to marry Elizabeth of York through their speaker Thomas Lovell, who declared: “Which marriage, they hoped God would bless with a progeny of the race of kings, to the great satisfaction of the whole realm”1. The Lords agreed with the Commons and it was clear that “for all Henry’s efforts to establish himself on the throne before his marriage, popular feeling still regarded marriage to Elizabeth as a crucial element in his title”2 .

The marriage was authorized by a papal legate on the 16th January and two days later the marriage of Henry VII and Elizabeth of York took place.

You can read more about the bride and groom in my article “Henry VII Marries Elizabeth of York”.

Notes and Sources

  1. Henry: Virtuous Prince, David Starkey, p38
  2. Rosemary Horrox, ‘Elizabeth (1466–1503)’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004

9 thoughts on “18 January 1486 – Marriage of Henry VII and Elizabeth of York”

  1. Fiz says:

    I love Elizabeth of York! Born a princess, bastardized by her uncle for whom she may have had a penchant, married to a man she did not love but learned to love, over-shadowed by a domineering mother-in-law and losing her beloved eldest son and then her life in an attempt to provide a “spare” – what a sad life she had and the few clues left about her make her seen gentle and lovable. Certainly she was loved in throughout the country and Henry sincerely mourned her.

    1. shamcakes says:

      I love this. I totally agree.

  2. WilesWales says:

    I believe that Elizabeth of York is on every deck of cards as either all the Queens, or two of them, I am not quite sure, but it’s nice to know that this portrait is being seen every day all over the world! Thank you, WilesWales

  3. WilesWales says:

    Well, I wasn’t sure about the number of cards on which Elizabeth of York is seen, it turns out that I read another very great report of Claire’s that basically confirms it is only one! Nice to learn knew things, and put old rumors to rest! Thank you, WilesWales

  4. EmmaKat says:

    One thing I’ve wondered lately: is there any evidence of Henry VII straying from his marriage? Edward IV certainly did, and we all know Henry VIII was certainly guilty of this charge, but I’ve never heard anything to connect the first Henry Tudor to that behavior, though I’m sure it would have been expected and purposefully overlooked by Elizabeth. What say you, Claire?

  5. Julz says:

    I live in Winchester, Hampshire. In the Cathedral, on the far east side, there is the Lady Chapel, named for Elizabeth of york, where her son Arthur was christened. There are beautiful 14th century frescos on the walls. Go and visit it if you get a chance.

    1. shamcakes says:

      I can’t express to you Julz….how incredibly fortunate you are to just simply be able to live in Winchester, Hampshire and are able to visit or be a paritioner of Lady Chapel….if only. I live in Texas…and although, there is alot of history here and very intersting history at that, it does not begin to touch what you are or have been exposed to…..I do envy you…..It sounds wonderful!! S-

  6. Dawn 1st says:

    The beginning of one of the most fascinating periods of British history, to me anyway. It is such a shame the Tudor Dynasty did carry on for a longer period…

    1. Dawn 1st says:

      type error, meant ‘shame the Tudor Dynasty didn’t carry on for a longer period’

Please note: Comment moderation is currently enabled so there will be a delay between when you post your comment and when it shows up.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.