• FREE Anne Boleyn Files Welcome Pack of 5 goodies
    sent directly to your inbox Free Tudor Book



    Includes 3 Free Reports, Book List and Primary Sources List Please check your spam box if you don't receive a confirmation email. PLEASE NOTE: Your privacy is essential to us and we will not share your details with anyone.

The Howard Family and Lady Anne Mowbray by Marilyn Roberts

Posted By on February 14, 2014

Queen Haven Publications

Queen Haven Publications

Today we have a guest post from Marilyn Roberts, historian and author of The Mowbray Legacy and Lady Anne Mowbray: The High and Excellent Princess. You can see my review of Lady Anne Mowbray over at our book reviews site – click here. Over to Marilyn…

This is the time of year when thoughts of Tudor enthusiasts turn to the beheading of Katherine Howard who, like her first cousin Anne Boleyn before her, had briefly been the most glittering star in the firmament at the court of King Henry VIII. In the twenty-first century the ducal branch of the Howards remains the premier noble family in the land, but had it not been for the untimely death of an eight-year-old girl in 1481, followed in 1483 by the sudden death of King Edward IV and the disappearance of his young sons, the Princes in the Tower, most people might never have heard of them.1

In December 2014 it will be half a century since the lead-encased body of Anne Mowbray, Duchess of York and Norfolk, was discovered on a building site north of the Tower of London, two miles from her supposed resting place. The catalogue of unfortunate errors associated with the removal of her remains from the site and their subsequent scientific examinations, caused an outcry among some leading Establishment figures of the day, and the child had to be reburied before the examinations were completed. The discovery in 1964 caused worldwide interest, but within a few weeks Anne Mowbray was once more consigned to the mists of oblivion.

Drawing of 1796 showing what was left of the Abbey of the Minoresses, or Poor Clares, north of the Tower after a huge fire; it was here in a forgotten vault that demolition workers found Anne Mowbray’s body in 1964.

Drawing of 1796 showing what was left of the Abbey of the Minoresses, or Poor Clares, north of the Tower after a huge fire; it was here in a forgotten vault that demolition workers found Anne Mowbray’s body in 1964.

In January 1476, John Mowbray, fourth duke of Norfolk died suddenly aged 31, leaving only a three-year-old daughter, Lady Anne, who, as a female, was not allowed to hold a dukedom in her own right and so was given the lesser title of Countess of Norfolk. Anne’s co-heirs in the event of her death without issue were Lord William Berkeley and Lord John Howard, the elderly sons of Lady Isabel and Lady Margaret Mowbray, two of her great-grandfather’s sisters. Anne, being a minor, became the ward of King Edward IV, who married her off to his own younger son Prince Richard, Duke of York, whom he also made Duke of Norfolk in a new creation. Betrothal at so young an age was by no means unusual, with marriage following some years later, but Anne was five- years-and-five-weeks-old and Prince Richard only four at the time of their nuptials.

The street called Minories lies to the north of the Tower; Anne Mowbray’s coffin was found behind these buildings in 1964.

The street called Minories lies to the north of the Tower; Anne Mowbray’s coffin was found behind these buildings in 1964.

The wedding was a magnificent affair that took place at St Stephen’s Chapel in the Palace of Westminster on a chilly January day in 1478. The tiny couple had to go through hours of ritual, totally incomprehensible to them, before the little girl was finally led from the altar by her new uncle-by-marriage, the future King Richard III, then aged twenty-five, whose other duties on that auspicious day included stepping outside among the common people in all his finery to cast gold and silver coins to them from golden basins.

Thus far, then, nothing illegal or remarkably removed from established laws of inheritance had transpired, but the day after the wedding the King’s reason for moving so quickly became abundantly clear when parliament passed legislation allowing the little husband to keep the Mowbray fortune for his lifetime should Anne die childless. Where did that leave the co-heirs, who would, quite correctly, have expected the inheritance to revert to them or their successors in such circumstances? Edward IV had reached an accommodation with Berkeley some months previously that, in return for his acquiescence, his enormous debts, the equivalent of many millions of pounds today, would be settled by the crown. As far as is known, John Howard was to get nothing, but appears not to have protested, perhaps because he was already a very rich man in his own right.

When Lady Margaret Mowbray married Robert Howard of Stoke-by-Nayland in Suffolk around 1420, she married beneath her station, and it is tempting to think this might have been a love match. Although her own financial prospects were not very promising, Margaret, a daughter of the first duke of Norfolk, could claim descent from Henry III and Edward I, among a long list of illustrious others. The impecunious Robert Howard, on the other hand, came from an untitled, yet fairly prosperous, family with lands in Norfolk and in the neighbouring county of Suffolk.

Later generations of Howards tried to embellish the family history by claiming descent from the Anglo-Saxon hero Hereward the Wake, but their origins remain obscure. What is known, however, is that in part they owed their prosperity to marrying local heiresses, and Robert Howard’s father, Sir John, a prominent figure in East Anglia, was no exception. Robert, however, being the son of his father’s second marriage, to a woman of rather modest means, was set to inherit very little.

Whatever the oddly-matched couple’s financial constraints might have been, it was their remarkable son John, a capable military man, a self-made and extremely astute businessman, ship owner, ambassador and loyal Yorkist, who found himself co-heir to Anne Mowbray, to whose hot-headed father he had remained a faithful kinsman, friend and helpmate. It is not absolutely certain that Robert Howard had even been a knight, but by the time of Lady Anne’s death, his and Margaret Mowbray’s son had already been elevated to the first rung of the Peerage as Lord John Howard.

Anne Mowbray, Duchess of York and Norfolk, referred to at her marriage as ‘the high and excellent princess’ died just short of her ninth birthday and, as planned, her little widower kept her fortune in land and property for his lifetime. It did not stop there, however, as the scheming Edward IV had yet more spurious legislation brought before parliament making over the inheritance to himself, should his son also die young.

As we know, the story unfolded very differently from what the King had expected, he dying suddenly in the spring of 1483 just before his 41st birthday and Prince Richard disappearing the following autumn with his brother, the uncrowned Edward V. Richard, Duke of Gloucester, the boys’ uncle, became King Richard III and restored the Mowbray inheritance and titles to Anne’s rightful heirs: William Berkeley became Earl of Nottingham, and John Howard Duke of Norfolk in new creations. Berkeley was of the ‘old’ nobility through and through, but for the Howard family this represented one huge and unprecedented leap from the bottom rung of the Peerage to the very top.

Posthumous portrait of John Howard c.1425-1485; first Howard Duke of Norfolk.

Posthumous portrait of John Howard c.1425-1485; first Howard Duke of Norfolk.

It seems probable that an enterprising, versatile and shrewd man like John Howard would have made the grade anyway, not reaching a dukedom perhaps, but almost certainly gaining high status within the Peerage in reward for loyalty and service. As it happened, though, the Howard family’s elevation to the premier non-royal dukedom was a mixed blessing. Loyal to Richard III, John Howard was killed at Bosworth only two years later, and his badly wounded son Thomas, Earl of Surrey was imprisoned by the victorious Henry VII for four years. Henry VII, though, realised Thomas was a very capable man, politically and militarily, whom he could trust, and he rose to great heights. The young Henry VIII eventually restored the dukedom in 1514, the year after the battle of Flodden, which had made Howard, by now an old man, into a national hero.

In 1524, Thomas, second duke, over eighty when he died, was succeeded by his son, another Thomas, who married a daughter of Edward IV as his first wife; it is this Thomas, third duke and uncle of both Anne Boleyn and Katherine Howard, with whom Tudor followers are most familiar. Anne Boleyn was a child of this Thomas Howard’s sister, Lady Elizabeth, while his brother, Lord Edmund, was Katherine Howard’s father. This family, with its origins in rural Suffolk, had certainly come a very long way in a relatively short time!

The lady on the left is Anne Mowbray’s mother, Elizabeth Talbot, 4th Mowbray Duchess of Norfolk. Facing her is Elizabeth Tilney Countess of Surrey, first wife of Thomas Howard and grandmother of Anne Boleyn and Katherine Howard

The lady on the left is Anne Mowbray’s mother, Elizabeth Talbot, 4th Mowbray Duchess of Norfolk. Facing her is Elizabeth Tilney Countess of Surrey, first wife of Thomas Howard and grandmother of Anne Boleyn and Katherine Howard23

However, the price the Howards were to pay for power, fame and fortune under the Tudors was great indeed, including the executions of the queens Anne Boleyn and Katherine Howard and their cousin Henry Howard, Earl of Surrey, an arrogant young man who had looked down on the “new erected men” at Henry VIII’s court with such disdain, conveniently forgetting the more humble side of his own family history. His father, the third Duke of Norfolk, escaped beheading only because Henry VIII died the day before it could be carried out, but was to remain in the Tower for the whole of the six year reign of Edward VI, and was only released when Mary Tudor came to the throne in 1553.

Memorial plaque on Tower Hill that includes the names of father and son Henry Howard, Earl of Surrey and Thomas Howard, 4th Duke of Norfolk. The 4th duke’s son, St Philip Howard, died in the Tower in 1595.

Memorial plaque on Tower Hill that includes the names of father and son Henry Howard, Earl of Surrey and Thomas Howard, 4th Duke of Norfolk. The 4th duke’s son, St Philip Howard, died in the Tower in 1595.

But that was not the end of it: Henry, Earl of Surrey having been lost to the headsman, it was his son, another Thomas, who succeeded as fourth duke, but he was executed in 1572 by Queen Elizabeth I (a Howard through her mother, Anne Boleyn) for his involvement in plots to replace her with Mary, Queen of Scots, whom he had hoped to marry.

These were dangerous times for anybody still adhering to the ‘old’ religion (the Howards of today are still leading Roman Catholics) but especially for such a prominent family so close to the throne, and the fourth duke’s son Philip, Earl of Arundel was a prisoner in the Tower for ten years. Nobody took the trouble to inform him that the charges against him had not been proved, or that Queen Elizabeth, his second cousin once removed, had never signed his death warrant, so he lived every day in fear of the executioner knocking at the door. He died in 1595, still a prisoner, at the age of 38, possibly of dysentery. Philip Howard was canonised by the Roman Catholic Church in 1970.

Howard family tree

Howard family tree – click to enlarge

Lady Anne Mowbray – the High and Excellent Princess is a short book concentrating solely on Anne, and tracing the little girl’s story from her eagerly anticipated birth in December 1472 to the present day. It includes the demise of the Mowbray dukedom of Norfolk when her father, whose only child she was, died young without a male heir; her marriage as a five-year-old to the four-year-old boy known to history as the younger of the Princes in the Tower; her own death at the age of eight and the eventual settlement of the Mowbray inheritance on her rightful heirs, the Berkeleys and Howards, by Richard III, her uncle-by-marriage, who had escorted her at her wedding. Also examined are the reasons for her having been interred three times, the discovery of her remains on a bomb site and the twentieth-century experts’ struggle to prepare her bones for decent reburial within the almost impossible time limit set down, somewhat reluctantly, by the then Home Secretary.

Queen Haven Publications

Queens-Haven Publications, www.queens-haven.co.uk

Marilyn’s book can be ordered at www.queens-haven.co.uk/queens-haven-orders.htm

Notes and Sources

  1. All references in this article: The Mowbray Legacy; Lady Anne Mowbray – the High and Excellent Princess
  2. Elizabeth Tilney died before her husband had the dukedom restored. He almost immediately married her young cousin Agnes Tilney who became Duchess of Norfolk in 1514. In her old age Agnes was committed to the Tower in 1541 for having withheld information about her step-granddaughter Katherine’s behaviour before her marriage to Henry VIII.
  3. For the (sometimes supposed) connection with the image of Elizabeth Talbot and the Ugly Duchess in Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland see www.queens-haven.co.uk/the-ladies-on-the-mowbray-cover.htm.

21 thoughts on “The Howard Family and Lady Anne Mowbray by Marilyn Roberts”

  1. Catherine Howard was my cousin. I am from the American Culpeppers, mainly of Georgia (USA). Just saying “hello”!

    1. Day says:

      The Colquitt family of Georgia is also related to this little Princess through their ancestor William Marshall , Earl of Pembroke, 1146 to 1219.

  2. Dawn 1st says:

    ‘From Humble Beginning Come Great Things’ this can certainly be applied to the Howards, I think, after reading this..

    That was very interesting Marilyn, thank you.

    How did they know this was little Anne Mowbrey, was there a marker that had survived, or a nameplate on the little lead casket?

    Poor little girl, lets hope she is finally at rest now, bless her.

    1. Claire says:

      In her book, Marilyn gives a translation of the full inscription that was written in Latin on a sash across the body and which identified the remains as Anne.

      1. Dawn 1st says:

        Thank you…best get the book then 🙂

        1. Claire says:

          It is very good!

  3. Anyanka says:

    I have the urge to sit in a high backed chair in a long tight dress , cross my arms and start singing away to ” The Howard Family” click click.

  4. Moniek says:

    Sounds like a very interesting book!

  5. Wendy says:

    Spooky. I work in the Minories and can see my office in that picture.

    1. Hi Wendy.

      Hamalworth House, 9 St Clare Street, is where the Holy Trinity Church used to be. The builders were clearing bomb-damaged buildings when they found Lady Anne’s coffin, and people ran from nearby offices to see ‘the mummy’.

  6. Ann Russell says:

    It occurs to my suspicious mind that Richard III might have known that Richard, Duke of York was dead, so he could pass his title of the Duke of Norfolk to John Howard. I believe that technically Richard of York was both Duke of York and Duke of Norfolk, and perhaps would have had to have been attainted to be able to give his title to someone else. Not a Richard III fan.

    1. Carolyn says:

      Ooh, excellent point, Ann! Not an R3 fan, either.

      1. Christine says:

        Yes iv just read alison weirs excellent book the princes in the tower, he was a nasty piece of work, all the evidence points to him having them murdered no matter what deluded Ricardians think, it’s well worth a read, I highly recommend it.

        1. Banditqueen says:

          Ricardians are not deluded. Our beliefs are based on sound research of original sources, with many of us being academics of some expertise, experience and acclaim. I could say the same for Henry Tudor fans, but it would not be true. I also accept that Henry tried to be a decent King, even if his claim was slight. While Alison Weir’s book is excellent it is open to interpretation. There is no conclusive evidence that the so called Princes were killed and the sources don’t agree with each other on what at the time were rumours only. Other books have come to different conclusions. I suppose you would call Proffessor Wilkinson deluded or Anne Sutton, or any of the late many other academic authors who have actually studied Richard iii in detail. Personally I also believe Henry Tudor is a bit maligned, but Richard was maligned because the Tudors narrowly won a battle in which he was killed, not because what Shakespeare says is true.

    2. The Princes were still alive when Berkeley and Howard were given the titles previously held by the Mowbrays, but they had been declared illegitimate, meaning that Prince Richard was no longer Duke of York and Norfolk. Duke of York was, and is, a royal title, but the dukedom of Norfolk was now vacant.

      There will always be a question mark over John Howard’s involvement in their disappearance: although he and his son (later the second duke) were amongst those who went to Westminster Abbey where Prince Richard was in sanctuary with his mother and persuaded her to give him up, there is nothing specific to link them to the boys’ disappearance.

  7. mrsfiennes says:

    Is the link the link the only place the book can be ordered because I noticed on Amazon it’s out of print?

    1. ‘Anne Mowbray’ is so new that we have yet to decide whether to put it on Amazon, so it is only available from us at the moment. ‘The Mowbray Legacy’ was on Amazon for several years but some faulty copies were appearing from somewhere and we distanced ourselves from that; however, we might go back, but not in the immediate future.
      On both Amazon.co.uk and Amazon.com, there are reviews (thank you) from people who have recently purchased ‘The Mowbray Legacy’ either from us, or from stately homes in the UK, so Amazon is in the wrong in saying that either of these books is out of print; both are properly registered with the ISBN Agency and a quick check should have shown ‘in print’ status.
      Thank you
      Queens-Haven Publications

      1. Claire says:

        When I looked on Amazon it said “currently unavailable” which simply means that Amazon don’t have stock of it.

  8. Linda Joyce says:

    How horrible it must have been to be a child in Tudor times – whether high or low born. Married off at the age of 4 – made to learn maths and Latin – that was bad enough when I was 13.
    Why is Quene Anne the most fascinating woman in history? I suspect she entranced everyone with whom she came into contact. And that’s not witchcraft – it’s charisma.

    1. Glen says:

      Linda Joyce,

      I believe the thought that Anne was a witch came from her husband, Henry VIII and he claimed she was a witch and had cast a spell on him, that absolves him of making the mistake of pursuing the wrong woman. Henry was to make use of that when he wanted out of the marriage.
      Anne was given the choice of confessing her adultery with her brother or being tried for witchcraft. Adultery becomes High Treason when your husband is the King of England, with the penalty being death by beheading. Witchcraft also carries the death penalty, but by burning at the stake. Anne confessed to Adultery/Treason for obvious reasons.

Please note: Comment moderation is currently enabled so there will be a delay between when you post your comment and when it shows up.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.