Sir Thomas More
Sir Thomas More

On this day in history, on the 7th February 1478, Sir Thomas More was born in Milk Street, London. He is famous as St Thomas More, after being beatified in 1886 and canonised in 1935, and his feast day is celebrated on the 22nd June in the Roman Catholic Church and the 6th July in the Anglican Church. He was executed on the 6th July 1535 during the reign of King Henry VIII.

As it is his birthday today, I thought I would write a factfile or bio on him.

Sir Thomas More Bio

Born: 7th February 1478 in Milk Street, London.

Died: 6th July 1535, executed at the Tower of London

Resting Place: Body buried in a common grave at St Peter ad Vincula Chapel, Tower of London, and head said to be buried in the Roper Vault at St Dunstan’s Church, Canterbury.

Family Background: Son of Sir John More (c.1451-1530), lawyer and judge on the King’s Bench, and Agnes Graunger (d.1499), daughter of Thomas Graunger, a Merchant of the Staple of Calais and an Alderman of London.

Education: Firstly St Anthony’s School, then from 1491 More joined the household of John Morton, Archbishop of Canterbury, then he studied at the University of Oxford. More studied Latin and logic before studying law in London.

Influences: Met and became friends with William Lilye, John Colet and Erasmus while at university.

Early Career: Between 1499 and 1503, More stayed at the Carthusian priory, London Charterhouse, while he considered joining the order. He also considered becoming a Franciscan monk but decided to devote himself to the law after he realised that a life of celibacy did not suit him. More became a Member of Parliament in 1504, an undersheriff of the City of London in 1510, a Master of Requests in 1514, one of the King’s counsellors in 1517 and then a Privy Counsellor in 1518.

Later Career: In 1521, Thomas More was knighted and made undertreasurer after proving himself by carrying out a diplomatic mission to Charles V with Cardinal Wolsey. He rose in influence as the King’s personal secretary and adviser, became Speaker of the House of Commons in 1523 and then the High Steward of the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge. He was appointed the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster in 1525. In 1529, More was made Lord Chancellor after the fall of Cardinal Thomas Wolsey.

Scholarly Work: History of King Richard III (unfinished but written 1512-18 and said to have influenced William Shakespeare’s Richard III, Utopia (published in 1516) – an account of a fictional island society and its social, political and religious customs. The book contrasted the chaos of Europe with the ordered life in Utopia where there was religious toleration, communal ownership of land and education for all. Assertio Septem Sacramentorum (1521)- helped Henry VIII write this defence of the Catholic Church and the Seven Sacraments. Responsio ad Lutherum – A counter-response to Luther’s reply to the Assertio. Dialogue (1528) – A book against the writings of Tyndale. Confutation of Tyndale’s Answer (1532) – A six volume work in repy to Tyndale’s An Answer Unto Sir Thomas More’s Dialogue. A Dialogue of Comfort Against Tribulation (1534) – written while imprisoned in the Tower of London.

Spouse: First wife Jane (or Joanna/Joan) Colt (died in 1511). More immediately married Alice Middleton, a widow with money.

Children: More had four children by his first wife – 1) Margaret (Meg) More (1504-1544) who married William Roper in 1521 and had 5 children. 2) Elizabeth More (1506-1564) who married William Daunce in 1525 and had 7 children. 3) Cecily More (1507-?) who married Giles Heron in 1525 and had 3 children. 4) John More II (1509-1547) who married Anne Cresacre in 1529 and had eight children. Thomas More also raised Alice’s daughter from her first marriage as his own. Thomas More went againts convention and gave all of his daughters a top quality classical education.

Study for the Family Portrait of Thomas More by Holbein
Study for the Family Portrait of Thomas More by Holbein

Religious Views: Even though Thomas More decided that life as a monk did not suit him, he wore a hair shirt on a daily basis and was said to practise flagellation.

More and the Reformation: Sir Thomas More supported the Catholic Church, which he saw as the true faith, and campaigned against the Reformation and heresy. His actions against the Reformation included helping Cardinal Wolsey to prevent the importation of Lutheran books into England, producing scholarly works against Luther’s writings and persecuting people who he perceived as heretics.

Fall and Death: In 1530 Sir Thomas More refused to sign a letter asking the Pope to annul the marriage of Henry VIII and Catherine of Aragon. He offers his resignation in 1531 but the King refuses only to relent in 1532 when More claims that he is having chest pains and is ill – More does not agree with Henry VIII becoming the head of the church in England. In 1533, More did not attend the coronation of Anne Boleyn and this was seen as a snub and Henry VIII is forced to act against More. In summer 1533, Thomas Cromwell launches an investigation into More’s activities and in February 1534 More is linked with Elizabeth Barton, “the holy maid of Kent” and accused of conspiring with her against the King. More writes to the King and Cromwell pleading his case and affirming his loyalty to the King and manages to escape trial.

After refusing to take the Oath of Succession, promising to uphold the Act of Succession (which declared Henry’s marriage to Catherine of Aragon null and void and established a new line of succession through the King and Anne Boleyn), Sir Thomas More was arrested and imprisoned in the Tower of London on 17th April, 1534. Sir Thomas More was tried for high treason on 1st July 1535 and even though More believed that he could not be convicted because he had never spoken out against the King or denied his headship of the Church, Richard Rich (the Solicitor General) testified that More had, in his presence, denied that the King was head of the Church. It was also decided that More’s silence was evidence of “a corrupt and perverse nature”.

Sir Thomas More was found guilty under the Treason Act of 1534. Between the jury verdict and sentencing, Sir Thomas More took the opportunity to speak out and declared that “no temporal man may be the head of spirituality”. More was then sentenced to be hanged until “half dead”, then disemboweled and burned. A few days later, King Henry VIII commuted More’s sentence to death by beheading.
Here is an account of Sir Thomas More’s execution on the 6th July 1535 from A Complete Collection of State Trials and Proceeding Upon Impeachments for High Treason, etc (London, 1719), cited at :-

“About Nine he was brought out of the Tower; his Beard was long, his face pale and thin, and carrying a Red Cross in his Hand, he often lift up his Eyes to Heaven; a Woman meeting him with a cup of Wine, he refused it saying, Christ at his Passion drank no wine, but Gall and Vinegar. Another Woman came crying and demanded some Papers she said she had left in his Hands, when he was Lord Chancellor, to whom he said, Good woman, have Patience but for an Hour and the King will rid me of the Care I have for those Papers, and every thing else. Another Woman followed him, crying, He had done her much Wrong when he was Lord Chancellor, to whom he said, I very well remember the Cause, and is I were to decide it now, I should make the same Decree.

When he came to the Scaffold, it seemed ready to fall, whereupon he said merrily to the Lieutenant, Pray, Sir, see me safe up; and as to my coming down, let me shift for myself. Being about to speak to the People, he was interrupted by the Sheriff, and thereupon he only desired the People to pray for him, and bear Witness he died in the Faith of the Catholic Church, a faithful Servant both to God and the King.  Then kneeling, he repeated the Miserere Psalm with much Devotion; and, rising up the Executioner asked him Forgiveness. He kissed him, and said, Pick up thy Spirits, Man, and be not afraid to do thine Office; my Neck is very short, take heed therefore thou strike not awry for having thine Honesty. Laying his Head upon the Block, he bid the Executioner stay till he had put his Beard aside, for that had commit­ted no Treason. Thus he suffered with much Cheerfulness; his Head was taken off at one Blow, and was placed upon London-Bridge, where, having continued for some Months, and being a­bout to be thrown into the Thames to make room for others, his Daughter Margaret bought it, in­ closed it in a Leaden Box, and kept it for a Relique.  Hall’s Chron. Vol. 2. S. 2.”

Legacy: Sir Thomas More was beatified in 1886 by Pope Leo XIII and then canonised along with John Fisher on the 19th May 1935 by Pope Pius XI. In 1970, More and Fisher were added to the Roman Catholic Calendar of Saints and given the 22nd June as their feast day. In 1980, Sir Thomas More and John Fisher were added to the Anglican Calendar of Saints and Heroes of the Christian Church and given 6th July as a celebratory day. In 2000, Pope John Paul II declared that Sir Thomas More was “the heavenly patron of statesmen and politicians.”

In The History of the English Speaking Countries Winston Churchill wrote of More:-

“The resistance of More and Fisher to the royal supremacy in Church government was a noble and heroic stand. They realised the defects of the existing Catholic system, but they hated and feared the aggressive nationalism which was destroying the unity of Christendom. … More stood as the defender of all that was finest in the medieval outlook. He represents to history its universality, its belief in spiritual values and its instinctive sense of other-worldliness. Henry VIII with cruel axe decapitated not only a wise and gifted counsellor, but a system, which, though it had failed to live up to its ideals in practice, had for long furnished mankind with its brightest dreams.”

and G.K. Chesterton wrote that More was the “greatest historical character in English history”.

Places: Institutions named after Sir Thomas More include The Thomas More Building at the Royal Courts of Justice at The Strand in London, The Thomas More Society: the politics society of Magdalen College, Oxford and the Thomas More Chambers in Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London.

Historic places associated with Sir Thomas More include: Westminster Hall at the Palace of Westminster, where there is a floor plaque commemorating More’s trial which took place in the original building; Crosby Hall, a privately owned reconstruction of More’s original Thames-side home; Chelsea Old Church whose southern chapel was commissioned by More and which contains the tomb and epitaph which More erected for himself and his wives; Tower Hill, Tower of London, where More was executed; St Peter ad Vincula Chapel, Tower of London, where More’s body was buried; St Dunstan’s Church Canterbury, which is home to the Roper vault where More’s daughter, Margaret Roper, buried More’s head; and Our Lady Queen of Martyrs and St Ignatius Catholic Church in Chideock, Dorset, which claims to have More’s hair shirt as a relic.

The Family of Sir Thomas More by Rowland Lockey after Hans Holbein the Younger
The Family of Sir Thomas More by Rowland Lockey after Hans Holbein the Younger

Saint Thomas More

In a moving article entitled “St Thomas More: A Man For This Season”, Deacon Keith Fournier quotes Pope John Paul II as saying of More:-

“Precisely because of the witness which he bore, even at the price of his life, to the primacy of truth over power, Saint Thomas More is venerated as an imperishable example of moral integrity. And even outside the Church, particularly among those with responsibility for the destinies of peoples, he is acknowledged as a source of inspiration for a political system which has as its supreme goal the service of the human person.”

and Fournier writes of how Sir Thomas More stood up for his faith and his beliefs:-

“This champion of heroic courage in the face of a State which has lost its soul never wavered in his fidelity to the Truth. He would not betray the truth or compromise it on the altar of public opinion or for political opportunism. He knew that to do so would not only have dishonored God and led his family and so many others astray, but that it would have given tacit assent to the emerging despotism of his age.

Thomas More was brought to trial for his fidelity to the Truth. Oh, as is always the case with persecution against Christians, it was framed as a charge against the “positive law”. There, this outstanding lawyer defended the Truth for which he would later give his life.”

Fournier then goes on to quote More himself, from an inscription in his Book of Hours:-

“Give me your grace, good Lord, to set the world at naught…to have my mind well united to you; to not depend on the changing opinions of others…so that I may think joyfully of the things of God and tenderly implore his help. So that I may lean on God’s strength and make an effort to love him… So as to thank Him ceaselessly for his benefits; so as to redeem the time I have wasted…”


Although I cannot agree with Sir Thomas More’s persecution of people he perceived to be heretics, I admire his courage, his unshakable faith, his honour and his desire to see a Utopian society. He knew what disagreeing with the King could lead to but he put his faith and his God first.


Related Post

16 thoughts on “Happy Birthday Sir Thomas More”
  1. Well, I don’t know if he was really a saint… I mean, yes, he died for his beliefs, but he had a lot of people who didn’t share those beliefs executed.. For me, that’s not a saint.

  2. Very interesting that he is celebrated in the Anglican Church. I did not know that. I converted to the Catholic Church at a St. Thomas More parish and so have always felt a kind of connection with him, but there are also some very unsavoury aspects to his character as well. A very human saint.
    I could spend a lifetime delving into the different lives and events of this time period-it’s all so interesting!

  3. I have a instinctive aversion to fanatics and there is something about him that strikes me as fanatical. I am always uncomfortable with anyone who thinks they have a hotline to the almighty I’m a fanatical anti-fanatic (yeah I know – lol).

    I saw an online interview with Hilary Mantel and found it interesting that she had a real dislike/distaste for Thomas More. It’s probably a reflection of our times that she finds Cromwell a bit easier to take – at least he knew who he was, no disguising self-interest or warped/repressed emotions as piety. I get it and can’t help but feel some of that as well.

    I always have to remind myself that people had a different mind set back then and some geniunely believed horrible acts were the right thing to do (Queen Mary I). Can you do horrible things and still be a good person….beats me.

    Ah, now I’m veering off topic…ah well.

    A thought-provoking post.


  4. Hi Eliza,
    I suppose the Catholic Church made him a saint for upholding the true faith and doing his best to stamp out heretics. I know what you mean though, it’s hard to understand how you can make someone a saint when they used such brutal means to protect the faith. I admire him for standing up for his beliefs and also not caving in to Henry. He could have taken the oath and just treated it as words, as so many did, but he could not do that, his faith would not let him and he put God first and the King second, just like he should have done. He felt that Henry was asking him to choose between God and him and he was not willing to do that.

  5. Hi Melissa,
    I agree with you about him being an “unsavoury saint” and, yes, he was a flawed human. I had to read Utopia at uni and remember finding it a really interesting book and being fascinated by the man who wrote it. Yes, these Tudor characters are wonderful aren’t they?!

  6. Hi Cranky,
    I think that Thomas More, like Mary I, was just trying to be a good Christian and protect the world from people who he saw as heretics and agents of Satan. Both More and Mary would have seen persecuting and executing heretics as their job, as God’s work. It does sound completely warped by today’s standards but I’m sure they thought they were doing the right thing. Many atrocities have been carried out in the Lord’s name, haven’t they? I’m not excusing it and that is not the God that I believe in but I can see how they thought they were doing right. I know what you mean about when you say “Can you do horrible things and still be good?”, can you really justify burning people alive by saying that you’re doing it in God’s name?! I think not but More and Mary seem to have thought very differently! When I read about the Pope encouraging Catholics to rise up againts Elizabeth I and to support the Catholic Mary Queen of Scots, I remember thinking “How can a man of God, a man who sees himself as God’s representative on Earth, encourage people to revolt and murder someone?”, it made no sense to me but the Pope obviously saw Elizabeth as a heretic.
    Like you, none of it makes sense to me but then we are judging 16th century people with our 21st century hearts and minds. Tough one!

  7. In this you are right, Claire, he did put his faith first and I give him credit for that.
    By the way, I forgot to mention, great job on this article, too! 🙂

  8. I agree with Cranky – More is not someone I can really feel sympathy for. I think (just my opinion) that it would have shown more courage to stay alive and deal with changes, perhaps even guiding the decisions. It’s like Henry made a hostile overtake of a company and during such turbulent times, a few good thinkers might have made it easier. I think the same thing applies to Mary. To have shown mercy would have been a kinder act. But I have 20/20 hindsight and was brought up with tolerance as a greater virtue.

  9. Melissa, I didn’t know you were a convert. I’m a convert too!

    Yeah, Thomas More had his flaws, but the Catholic Church doesn’t make people saints because they were sinless. If that was the case nobody would be a saint. More is one of my favorite saints. I would love to go back in time and meet him. Since we haven’t invented time travel yet I guess I’ll just have to wait till I’m in heaven.

  10. I too admire More for his courage and strength to stand firm in what he believed in, I don’t like the burnings. They were innocent people, and I cannot stomache that. I admire him yet I canot fully admire him.

  11. I know that this is completely off topic, but doesn’t the young woman on the right hand side of the portrait of the More Family (sitting, in the center) look a lot like Holbein’s portrait of Jane Seymour? Sorry, the likeness has always struck me.

    I wonder how Henry VIII felt about having to execute someone who was so near and dear to him for so long. It must have haunted him greatly.

  12. I guess the saying “let people have their own beliefs, as long as it doesn’t hurt anyone else” does not apply here.
    It is not only tragic to die for basically no reason, but the way in which they died was just terrible. I can’t help think that a Christian person would be kind and thoughtful and loving, to be Christ like…
    I respect Sir Thomas More for his passion for his religion and he seemed to be a great family man, but like most of you, I can’t get passed the cruelity.

  13. Sheena, she does resemble Jane Seymour a bit here, doesn’t she? She’s Margaret Roper, Thomas More’s daughter (the one who rescued her father’s head and was supposedly buried with it). There’s a larger copy of the picture at

    Looking at the larger copy, you can see lots of detail. Man, those dogs are odd looking! One looks weirdly two-dimensional and other looks like it has a human…ish face. And there’s a really ugly monkey (I might be prejudiced – I think monkeys are creepy) in the extreme right of the picture.

    Looking for this pic online, I stumbled across a link to a theory I had read years ago, and it’s still fascinating but unlikely (to me).

    Essentially, this guy says there are all sorts of anomalies and clues in the More Family portrait, that disclose that…. (drum roll, please) That the Princes in the Tower weren’t murdered by anybody, but were smuggled out and given secret identities. One of which was as More’s godson and son-in-law, Dr. John Clement. And that More’s account of the Princes’ murders was a blind to protect them and cover up the fact that they were alive.

    The other prince was allegedly Sir Edward Guildford, whose daughter Jane married John Dudley, the Duke of Northumberland. Which would have made Guildford Dudley, husband to the Lady Jane Grey, the grandson of Edward V, and having more of a claim to the throne than anybody guessed (except his mama, who kept insisting Jane give him the title of King!) And that would have made Queen Elizabeth’s favorite, Robert Dudley, also a grandson of Edward V.

    So, if you like very convoluted conspiracy theories (think Da Vinci Code on steroids), it’s an interesting read!

  14. His faith led him astray by the sounds of things. He was so dedicated to his beliefs that his mind could not process or deal with the idea of anyone else not believing the same. Great article anyway.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *