- Home
- About
- Books
- Biographies
- Six Wives
- Thomas Cranmer
- Mary Boleyn
- The Boleyns
- Sir Thomas Wyatt the Elder
- Margaret Tudor
- Arthur, Prince of Wales
- Mary Tudor, Queen of France
- Cardinal Wolsey
- Tudor Characters Competition
- Margaret Beaufort
- Charles Brandon, Duke of Suffolk
- Thomas Howard, 3rd Duke of Norfolk
- Catherine of Aragon
- Anne Boleyn – Chronology
- Jane Seymour
- Anne of Cleves
- Catherine Howard
- Catherine Parr
- George Boleyn, Lord Rochford
- Sir Henry Norris
- Mark Smeaton
- Sir William Brereton
- Sir Francis Weston
- Jane Boleyn
- Sir Thomas More
- Elizabeth of York
- Edward VI
- Lady Jane Grey
- Mary I
- Elizabeth I – Early Life
- Mary Queen of Scots
- Anne
- Anne Boleyn and Henry VIII
- The Fall of Anne Boleyn
- Anne Boleyn’s Execution
- The Events of May 1536
- Fall Articles
- Coronation
- Anne and Elizabeth
- Anne Boleyn’s Badge
- Birth
- Resting Place
- Pregnancies
- Religion
- Early Life of Anne Boleyn
- Marriage
- Anne Boleyn and Hans Holbein
- Impact on History
- Anne Boleyn in Fiction and on TV
- Anne Boleyn’s Household
- Anne and Henry’s Relationship 1528-1533
- Events of 1533
- Forum
- Reports
- Free Report
- Resources
- Chronology
- Events
- Q & A
- Books
- Tudor History Courses
- The Tudors Episode Guide
- Primary Sources
- Key Tudor Dates
- Anne Boleyn Words
- Anne Boleyn Pictures
- Anne Boleyn Places
- The Six Wives of Henry VIII
- Educational Videos
- The Mary Rose
- Henry VIII is Alive – Comedy
- Addicted to Anne Boleyn
- British History Timeline
- Tudor Life
- Tudor Places
- Tudor Family Tree
- Henry VIII Resources
- British History Resources
- Newsroom
- Quotes
- Contact
- Advertise with us
Categories
- Anne Boleyn Appearance
- Anne Boleyn Art
- Anne Boleyn Execution
- Anne Boleyn Experience
- Anne Boleyn Fall
- Anne Boleyn General
- Anne Boleyn Myths
- Anne Boleyn Personality
- Anne Boleyn Places
- Anne Boleyn portraits
- Anne Boleyn Questions
- Anne Boleyn's Life series
- Anne Queen Consort
- Background
- Boleyn Myth
- Books
- Early Life
- Edward VI
- Elizabeth I
- Events of 1536
- Fall of Anne Boleyn videos
- Friday fun
- George Boleyn
- Hans Holbein
- Henry VIII
- Jane Boleyn
- Lady Jane Grey
- Marriage
- Mary Boleyn
- Mary I
- Monarchy
- Myths and Legends
- News
- Newsroom
- On This Day in Tudor History
- Quizzes
- Representations of Anne Boleyn
- Six Wives
- Spoofs
- The Boleyns
- The Reformation
- The Tudors
- Thomas Boleyn
- Tudor Characters
- Tudor Costume
- Tudor Events
- Tudor Jewellery
- Tudor Politics
- Tudor Times
- Wednesday Facts
- Wolf Hall
5 thoughts on “#fridayfun – Poll: Do you think Anne Boleyn was innocent of the charges laid against her in May 1536?”
Please note: Comment moderation is currently enabled so there will be a delay between when you post your comment and when it shows up.
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
-
Recent Posts
- Cecily Neville: Mother of Kings by Amy Licence
- Succession by Livi Michael
- Wars of the Roses: Trinity by Conn Iggulden
- #FridayFun – Did Anne Boleyn set out to trap Henry VIII?
- The Light in the Labyrinth: The Last Days of Anne Boleyn by Wendy J. Dunn
- 7 September 1533 – A daughter for Henry VIII and Anne Boleyn
- An Illustrated Introduction to the Tudors by Gareth Russell
- #WednesdayFact – Anne Boleyn refused Henry VIII’s advances
- Tudors: The Illustrated History by Richard Rex – Do not buy if you own Rex’s The Tudors!
- #PortraitTuesday – An Anne Boleyn engraving by Cornelis Vermeulen
- The Six Wives and Many Mistresses of Henry VIII: The Women’s Stories by Amy Licence
- Mary, Queen of Scotland and the Isles by Margaret George
- The Crown: A Novel by Nancy Bilyeau
- The Jezebel Effect: Why the Slut Shaming of Famous Queens Still Matters by Kyra Cornelius Kramer
- Tudor and Medieval Diseases Quiz
- The Tapestry by Nancy Bilyeau
Search
Copyright © 2023 The Anne Boleyn Files || sitemap_index.xml || Wordpress installation and design by http://www.MadeGlobal.com
I would be interested to know which of the charges those who voted for “Some” include in that term. I think all of the charges were manufactured from gossip and innocent remarks taken out of context.
Most definitely Anne was innocent of the charges against her, her sad story has been analysed in great detail over the centuries since her death and in her own day, her unprecedented arrest trial and execution found her many people were sympathetic to her plight, she was disliked by those supporters of Queen Katherine and her daughter, she was hated by those of the Catholic faith but then as now, people do not like to see injustice done and many were shocked by the behaviour of their king as he cavorted about with Jane Seymour, ultimately becoming engaged to her the day after his second queens head rolled in the dust, the speed of her fall was dramatic and makes Henry V111 a man very difficult to understand, this was the woman he had waited to possess for nearly a decade, in the physical sense and he had pledged to marry her thus making her queen, the depth of his great love was evident in the way he esteemed her above all others, he showered honours on her family, she was elevated to Marchioness of Pembroke and was crowned uniquely with St Edwards crown, then within three short years of marriage that great love had whittled away, and a sword from Calais or St Omer ended her life, thus Henry V111’s psychology is intriguing, what sort of man murders the love of his life? How could he make his little daughter not quite three motherless? When Anne Boleyn died she took five innocent men with her and all of them swore till the end they were innocent, except her wretched musician, Henry and his chief minister orchestrated his second queens murder and there had to be scapegoats, it did not matter that they were long associates of the king, the safety of his realm was at stake the king had to have a prince, therefore his troublesome queen had to go, and he could not allow her to live, as one historian so aptly put it many years ago, it was the most revolting murder ever committed, the king was head of justice of his realm, as his first queen beseeched him years before in the court at Blackfriars, yet his second queen nor her alleged lovers had justice, how can a queen be accused of adultery in one place when evidence proves she was somewhere else and in the company of the king himself or others, vital evidence was dismissed and a great deal of hearsay and women’s gossip were put forward as proof of her so called adultery, even when she was going through the churching process following the birth of Elizabeth it was said she invited one of her paramours to copulate with her, yet this was a time of sacred ritual when the new mother would abstain from sexual relations and give thanks to god for her safe delivery, Anne’s piety was well known and yet these charges slandered her character dreadfully so she was portrayed as nothing better than a tavern whore, there was the silly tale about the queen calling for marmalade and that was the cue to bring Mark Smeaton into her bedchamber, the incest charge must have sickened both her and her brother and yet she rose above it so there was never any doubt of her innocence and her courage was great, her ‘cuckolded’ husbands reputation never quite recovered from the infamy done to his murdered queen and his next adventures into marriage hood were nothing more than a failure, the saintly Jane whom he married over the body of his wife’s corpse died from the travails of childbirth, and the following were both disasters, only with his last queen may he have found some peace of mind, but he has gone down in history as a king who killed not just one wife but two, and Anne Boleyn has been vindicated many times over.
I think that Anne was innocent of adultery and incest. However, the capital crime at issue was the charge of treason … and, IIRC, treason was defined as “imagining or compassing the death of the king”. Anne admitted to telling Henry Norris that “if aught came to the king but good, you would look to have me.” This sounds like “imagining the death of the king” to me.
Imagining or compassing meant plotting really and Anne was actually reprimanding Norris so I don’t believe you could take these words as treasonous unless you really twisted them. Also, the date of her conversation with Norris was not listed in the indictments.
Maybe the word “imagining” has changed its meaning over the years, but the words on their face are suspicious. Susannah Lipscomb, among others, thinks that the conversation with Norris was “courtly love gone wrong” — Henry thought her (and Norris) guilty based on this conversation, even though they weren’t (and Norris told Henry so to Henry’s face). I don’t think the lack of a date was fatal, though — if the wrong dates (of the acts of adultery) weren’t fatal, I doubt that an omission would be.