September 29 – Cardinal Campeggio arrives in England to hear Henry VIII’s case for an annulment

Posted By on September 29, 2022

On this day in Tudor history, 29th September 1528, in the reign of King Henry VIII, Cardinal Lorenzo Campeggio landed at Dover on the south coast of England.

Campeggio had been sent as a papal legate to hear Henry VIII’s case for annulment along with Cardinal Thomas Wolsey, who’d been made the pope’s vice-regent. The English king was intent on having his marriage to Catherine of Aragon annulled.

Find out more about what happened next, what happened at the special legatine court, and how Henry ended up waiting for his annulment for a few more years…

Scroll down for my video on Catherine of Aragon’s speech at the legatine court.

Transcript:

On this day in Tudor history, 29th September 1528, the papal legate, Cardinal Lorenzo Campeggio, landed at Dover on the Kent coast. In early 1528 Cardinal Thomas Wolsey, Henry VIII’s right hand man, had written to Pope Clement VII outlining Henry VIII’s demand that the case for an annulment of his marriage to Catherine of Aragon be decided in England by Wolsey and a visiting papal legate, who would act with the full authority of the Pope. On 13th April 1528, a papal bull had empowered Cardinal Wolsey as the Pope’s viceregent “to take cognisance of all matters concerning the King’s divorce” and Campeggio had been made papal legate in June 1528 in preparation for hearing the divorce case.

On 8th December 1528, Cardinal Campeggio arrived in London but historian Eric Ives explains how his “powers were not complete” which necessitated “further wearisome and unsatisfactory negotiation” with the papacy. This lack of authority was actually a papal stalling tactic.

Things were made worse for Henry VIII and Wolsey when Catherine of Aragon produced Pope Julius II’s dispensation for her to marry Henry. This put a spanner in the works and caused delays with the case. In the meantime, Campeggio met with Catherine and advised her to join a convent, something which would allow the marriage to be annulled easily. However, Catherine believed that she was Henry’s true wife and queen and would not agree to taking the veil.

Henry VIII and Wolsey then played dirty, threatening Catherine with separation from her daughter, Mary, if she would not obey the King. Instead of submitting to the King, Catherine decided to fight back.

Campeggio could only stall for so long and formal proceedings finally began on 31st May 1529 at the Legatine Court at Blackfriars.

On 16th June 1529, at Baynard’s Castle, Catherine met with William Warham, Archbishop of Canterbury; Cuthbert Tunstall, Bishop of Durham; Nicholas West, Bishop of Ely; John Clerk, Bishop of Bath and Wells; John Fisher, Bishop of Rochester; Henry Standish, Bishop of St Asaph; Jorge de Athequa, Bishop of Llandaff; her almoner, Robert Shorton, and John Talcarne. In their presence, she wrote a formal appeal to the Pope against the authority of the legatine court, requesting that the case be heard in Rome.

Two days later, Catherine and her husband, Henry VIII, were summoned to appear before the court. The king sent proxies, Richard Sampson, dean of the Chapel Royal, and Dr John Bell, but Catherine chose to appear at the court in person, accompanied by her ladies-in-waiting and the bishops who were to act as her counsel for the proceedings. Henry Ansanger Kelly explains that Catherine “read a protest, the essence of which was that her appearance there and anything that she should say were not to be taken as an indication of approval of the legates as competent judges in the case, nor to derogate from any allegations, protestations, provocations, appeals, complaints, supplications, recusations, and reclamations made to the pope”. She made the point that the judges were far from impartial, being closely associated to the king, and stated that the court proceedings should not be taking place while the case was still pending at Rome. She instructed that her protest be recorded and the judges stated that her protestation would be answered in proceedings on 21st June.

On 21st June, Catherine AND Henry appeared at the court. Rather than simply confirming her attendance, Catherine sank to her knees in front of her husband and gave the speech of her life. I’ll give you a link to my talk on her speech, in which I read it in full. It’s an incredible speech. She reminded the king that she’d been his true wife for 20 years and that she’d been a true maid at their marriage. She concluded it by committing her cause to God. Catherine then rose to her feet, curtseyed to the King and walked out of the court, ignoring those who tried to make her return to her seat and saying, “On, on, it makes no matter, for it is no impartial court for me, therefore I will not tarry. Go on.”

Catherine had stolen the show and her speech was hard to follow. Henry VIII addressed the court speaking of his love for Catherine but also of his troubled conscience regarding the fact that he had acted contrary to God’s law in marrying his brother’s widow.

Over the next month, Henry VIII tried to prove that Catherine had consummated her marriage to his brother, Arthur, but Catherine had already signed protestations of her virginity and Bishop John Fisher shocked the court in his defence of Catherine’s virtue, quoting from the Book of Matthew and saying:
“Quos Deus conjunxit, homo non separet. ‘What therefore God has joined together, let not man put asunder.’ And, for as much as this marriage was made and joined by God to a good intent, I say that I know the truth; which is that it cannot be broken or loosed by the power of man.”

He then said that he was so convinced of Catherine’s cause that he would lay down his life for it.

Henry VIII then sent Wolsey and Campeggio to see Catherine, to try and bully her into submission, but this failed miserably. In desperation, Campeggio tried another stalling tactic. In July 1529 he announced that the court would adjourn until October, for a summer recess due to the fact that it was “reaping and harvesting” time in Rome, a time when courts did not sit. Henry VIII was furious but the Legatine Court was suspended, never to sit again because then news reached England that Catherine’s appeal to Rome had been successful. It was a huge blow for Henry, who had expected the court to pass sentence and rule in his favour.

Henry VIII’s marriage to Catherine of Aragon was not annulled until nearly 4 years later, in May 1533 when Archbishop Thomas Cranmer and his court ruled that Henry and Catherine had never been legally married and that the King’s marriage to Anne Boleyn, which had taken place in secret on 25th January 1533, was valid. A pregnant Anne Boleyn was crowned Queen of England just days later.

Here is my video on Catherine of Aragon’s speech:

1 thought on “September 29 – Cardinal Campeggio arrives in England to hear Henry VIII’s case for an annulment”

  1. Christine says:

    Years later, Katherine questioned her motives in refusing to accept the annulment her husband had so desperately wanted, in her last days she conversed with Eustace Chapyus the imperial ambassador, her champion good friend and mentor, over wether she had been right to resist the king, her obstinacy in claiming her marriage was true and lawful, her refusal to enter a convent led irrevocably to Henry V111 splitting with Rome and setting himself up as the head of his new church, the chasm which split England into two between Catholic and the new reformist religion, and the threat of civil war which had been ever present, had she done right she pondered? But as David Starkey remarked, the driving force behind Henry was ultimately Henry he at the end, decided on the final course of action, still it was something which plagued her towards the end of her life, she had been separated from her daughter having not seen her for five years, and in the end she had not succeeded in keeping her errant husband from her rivals side, Anne Boleyn had been anointed and crowned, a singular honour for any queen consort and the little Princess Elizabeth was the kings legal heir, her own daughter Mary had been bastardised, had she agreed to go to a Covent as Campeggio had put to her, Mary would still have been her fathers heir, as Elizabeth would not being another girl, taken precedence over her, she must have felt in her misery it had all been for nothing, but her singleminded pursuit of what she felt to be right had been so characteristic of this remarkable woman that one can only admire her for it, in her own day her extreme piety, her courage and her noble fight against the injustice of kings actions had endeared many to her, indeed it is something which we admire to this day, her enduring loyalty and devotion towards her husband, misplaced though it was is something all women in love can resonate with and feel sympathy for.

Please note: Comment moderation is currently enabled so there will be a delay between when you post your comment and when it shows up.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Mastodon
Share via
Copy link
Powered by Social Snap