Avatar
Please consider registering
guest
sp_LogInOut Log Insp_Registration Register
Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
sp_Feed Topic RSSsp_TopicIcon
William Stafford
July 23, 2012
1:09 pm
Avatar
Louise
Hampshire, England
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 611
Member Since:
December 5, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

In ‘The Other Boleyn Girl’ the relationship of Mary Boleyn and William Stafford is told as a love story whereby William saves Mary from the corrosive ambitions of her corrupt and uncaring family. But does anyone else have reservations regarding Stafford’s character?
He was a commoner who deliberately courted the Queen’s sister knowing the scandal it would cause. He knowingly put her in a compromising position instead of keeping his distance, as he should have done. It isn’t known whether she married in secret and then fell pregnant, or the other way around, but either way Stafford further compromised Mary by not being up front about their relationship. Not until there was nothing he could do to continue hiding it, did the relationship come to light. Mary was disgraced and they were both sent from court. None of that shows Stafford in a good light. If he genuinely cared about Mary then it could certainly have been handled better, whereby she could have been saved at least some of the wrath of her family. Is any of this the actions of an honourable man?
There is also the fact that he married Mary knowing that he couldn’t afford to support her. She continued to be supported by her family whilst her marriage remained a secret, and presumably Stafford benefited from that support. Perhaps that was another reason why he tried so hard to keep it secret for as long as possible. Once the marriage came to light then the financial support stopped, because after all it is a husband’s duty to keep his wife, not her family. Stafford couldn’t do so, and Mary was forced to write to Cromwell begging assistance from her family. The letter clearly shows that she was in love with Stafford, but he allowed his wife to beg assistance from her family. Did the man have no pride? Perhaps Thomas Boleyn did have responsibility for his daughter, even following her marriage, but Anne, George and Norfolk shouldn’t have been expected to bail Mary out of trouble. They may well have taken the view that she had made her bed and should lie in it. Why should George or Norfolk give financial support to a married women. Stafford, in my view, should have shouldered the responsibility, but failed to do so. Yet he was quite happy to marry Mary and then expect her family to subsidise himself and his wife so that she could maintain the lifestyle she was accustomed to.
To add insult to injury, following the death of George Boleyn, Stafford fashioned himself with the title Lord Rochford, despite the fact that he absolutely no right whatsoever to the title.
I have massive reservations as to Stafford’s character. When he married Mary she had been a widow for nearly six years. She was possibly lonely and vunerable. She had spent those years in the shadow of her two dazzling siblings. Did Stafford, an ambitious social climber, take advantage of the emotional vunerability of a woman he saw as a gravy train? I think there’s a very strong argument for suggesting that as a possibility.

July 23, 2012
3:51 pm
Avatar
Janet
ON Canada
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 153
Member Since:
February 24, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Louise…..I completely agree with you. I’ve thought those same things since I read TOBG, but I kept thinking that there were so many inaccuracies in the book, that maybe this was just another. I haven’t read much about him in anything else though, so I don’t know if my view of him is a real one.

July 23, 2012
4:09 pm
Avatar
Olga
Australia
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 766
Member Since:
October 28, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

They’re all valid points Louise, but I’m not sure about it. Bear with me because I haven’t read a lot about Stafford yet.
How could it have been handled better to save Mary some of the wrath of her family? I don’t think that, even if they were genuinely in love, there is any way they would have been allowed to marry. I agree with your point that he knew the scandal it would cause, and by the standard of the day it doesn’t make for an honourable man, but I just can’t think of how the situation could have been handled differently.
I don’t think Stafford took advantage of Mary. I think Mary would have known exactly what she was doing. She may have purposely made a match with someone outside the nobility so she wouldn’t be saddled with a political marriage. They may have had a sexual relationship and conceived before they got married, which obviously would have left them no choice. As far as I know Mary had a reasonably small pension as a widow, I don’t know if she had access to the sort of money her siblings or Father would have had. I’m sure if Stafford was a social climber he would have been looking to “future” income, sure, but I don’t think Mary was accustomed to as nearly a lavish lifestyle as the rest of the Boleyns. Of course I could be wrong, I’m scrabbling to remember time-lines at the moment of when she was as court.
I didn’t know about him taking the title (or trying to) of Rochford, was this just after George’s death or after Jane’s?

July 23, 2012
4:32 pm
Avatar
Louise
Hampshire, England
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 611
Member Since:
December 5, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Hi Olga,
When I say it could have been handled better, I mean that it should have been in the open rather than done in such an underhanded and devious way. The family would not have been happy for the marriage to take place, but Mary was an adult so they couldn’t have prevented it. By the time they were faced with the fact that their daughter/sister had married, it had already happened without them having any knowledge of it. That would cause wrath and anger in most families. To have been honest and up front would have been better than what actually happened. I think that was rather cowardly of Stafford and certainly not an honourable way to behave. In any event he should never have allowed his relationship with Mary get that far. He had to have known what he was doing and the scandel and disgrace Mary would be subjected to.
I think Mary knew what she was doing and that she was genuinely in love wth him, but I don’t think she realised the poverty she would be facing. Mary had Boleyn money and support behind her and was lady-in-waiting to Anne. She lived a life of extreme luxury which was taken away from her.
I may be entirely wrong about Stafford, but nothing I have read about him leads me to have much respect for him.

July 23, 2012
5:16 pm
Avatar
Janet
ON Canada
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 153
Member Since:
February 24, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Perhaps Mary was so afraid of what her family would say that she made Stafford promise not to tell? That’s the only reason I could think of for him keeping this a secret. Perhaps he thought he would be welcomed into the bosom of the Boleyn family for some reason? Mary grew up not wanting anything and I don’t think she really had a very realistic idea of what her life would be like when she married him. Some people make their decisions based on the moment at hand, rather than considering what could be in the future because of that decision.

July 23, 2012
5:47 pm
Avatar
Boleyn
Kent.
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2285
Member Since:
January 3, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Well either this pure conincidence or either Louise or Olga have devoloped Telepathic ability. I’m in thr process of re reading TOBG at the moment and have got to the bit where Mary and Stafford freindship is starting to blossom into something more..
I agree with Louise I too feel like Mary knew what she was doing. I think that Mary was sick of court life, sick of the way she was being treated, and sick of seeing the world she once knew slowly falling to bits.. She wanted out and William Stafford offered her the ideal solution.
As for William well i’ve not formed a reasonable opinion about him yet, but i think he had feelings for Mary and perhaps saw as a lost sheep, needing care.
I don’t know why but I sort of get the impression that after Henry had filled his boots with Mary, because she was no further use she became a sort of outcast from the family. Almost like the Black Sheep..

Semper Fidelis, quod sum quod

July 23, 2012
6:35 pm
Avatar
Sharon
Binghamton, NY
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2114
Member Since:
February 24, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Well now I don’t know what to think! Did anyone ever get married for love or was it always for money and status? I have never looked at this story from the point of view that Stafford may have wanted to get into the family for what it could bring him. I thought they were in love. I must be getting soft in my old age. I always thought Stafford and Mary were married because they loved each other and damn the consequences. Until today, I have thought of Stafford as a good man, with an honest profession who fell in love with Mary and she with him. Couldn’t Mary have written that letter without Stafford knowing about it? I can see what you are saying though. He very well could have believed they would be set up well.
Darnit, Louise! You may be right! Cry
Did Mary ask for financial aid from George and Norfolk? It has been a while since I read the letter, but I always read that part of the letter as her wanting their forgiveness or to be remembered by them in a good way. Not sure.

July 23, 2012
6:44 pm
Avatar
Janet
ON Canada
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 153
Member Since:
February 24, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I just finished watching the BBC production of TOBG and I definitely got the impression that William was in love with Mary before she was in love with him. He asked her to marry him and she turned him down at first. It was only after Anne was trying to find a ‘suitable’ match for her that she went back to William. Did anyone else find this?

July 23, 2012
7:00 pm
Avatar
Sharon
Binghamton, NY
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2114
Member Since:
February 24, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Janet,
As much as I dislike that movie, that is the way I saw the romance of Mary and Stafford. Until today. Cry
I don’t recall Anne coming up with an “appropriate” husband for Mary. I’m not saying Anne didn’t want the opportunity to marry Mary off to someone of her choosing, but I don’t remember a suitable man ever being mentioned. I do think that is why Mary was banished. By marrying Stafford Mary put the kybosh on any political union the Boleyns would have wanted for her.

July 23, 2012
7:17 pm
Avatar
Louise
Hampshire, England
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 611
Member Since:
December 5, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Sorry!!!LaughYellWinkFrownCry
I thought they may all be relevant.
I used TOBG because of how it showed the relationship, but I’m not commenting on TOBG, just what I perceive as the possible reality. But then I am a dreadful cynic.

July 23, 2012
7:20 pm
Avatar
Janet
ON Canada
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 153
Member Since:
February 24, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

In the movie that I watched today, Mary was told by Ann and her parents that the match was with Lord Farnleigh, a man that Ann had introduced to Mary previously at court. That’s when Mary told them she was already married to William. I don’t really blame her though. Lord Farnleigh looked old enough to be her father. Surprised Is this how it was in the other TOBG movie with Natalie Portman?

July 23, 2012
7:24 pm
Avatar
Boleyn
Kent.
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2285
Member Since:
January 3, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Janet ..The way Mary has been portrayed in TOBG television version, could well be as close the truth as Mary was in real life. I think Mary was stunned when William said marry me, and of course she would have known the result of what such a proposal of marriage from someone with nothing and nowhere to go, that doesn’t mean she was completely against the idea. I just feel as if she turned against her family what little she had would be lost, I also think she was thinking of her son’s welfare too, Anne might take out her anger about Mary’s desicion to marry on her son.

Of course the real turning point in the whole film was the fact of who Anne had decided to choose as Mary’s husband, an old man in short and although he had a title and money and would be set for life the whole prospect of being married to a man old enough to be her father and him to be in her bed grinding away at her night after night was enough to turn anyone’s stomach I should think…
I don’t think Anne meant any malice towards Mary in trying arrange this match, but given the whole situation in the court where the Boleyn’s were concerned he was perhaps the only nobel left that was suitable for someone of Mary’s rank.. I believe many nobels left the court once KOA was put aside in a sort of protest against Henry for marrying some of gentle birth, in short not of Royal status, or in their opinion not fitting to be of Royal status..
I believe William and Mary did love each other, but the loss of her family did hurt her. I think Anne came to terms with Mary’s marriage to William but she perhaps didn’t understand Mary’s reasons for marrying someone of no distinction or ambition. I think Mary and Anne shared the odd letter or 2 and Anne sent Mary a gold cup with a small purse of money from Henry when Mary wrote to her and said she was a little hard up etc…
Of all the Boleyn’s Mary was perhaps the wisest of them all she got out before the mucky stuff hit the fan, kept her head down and her mouth shut, and lived a happy and peaceful life, with a man who loved her for her, not because of what he could get for her etc…I say Good for Mary…

Semper Fidelis, quod sum quod

July 23, 2012
8:20 pm
Avatar
Sharon
Binghamton, NY
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2114
Member Since:
February 24, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Sorry Janet, I thought you were asking if it was true that Anne made a match for Mary. I didn’t realize you were talking about what happened in the movie. Embarassed
Boleyn took care of it.

July 24, 2012
4:18 pm
Avatar
Janet
ON Canada
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 153
Member Since:
February 24, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I think the whole thing about Mary and Stafford is interesting. It’s just too bad we’ll never know for sure. In the BBC movie, I liked the way William was portrayed and it did make me think about the way it might have been. However, I still think that he was opportunistic to some extent and Mary didn’t have a very good idea of what her life was going to be like married someone like him. Maybe she really did want to get away from her family and just thought “well it’s not going to be all that bad and anything is better than staying here”, but I also think she was looking for some security for her children and having a husband would help. I guess that makes her opportunistic as well, even though it seems she did love him. Wink

July 24, 2012
4:20 pm
Avatar
Janet
ON Canada
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 153
Member Since:
February 24, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I also want to say that I think it’s great when threads like these are started. It makes me start wondering and then I go looking for information. I’ve found that a great deal of information comes from the knowledgeable members here, so thank you.Smile

July 25, 2012
1:44 am
Avatar
Olga
Australia
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 766
Member Since:
October 28, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Louise has just ruined all our romantic notions of Mary escaping with her true love into the sunset! Where is my feather duster? Laugh

I agree that they should have been open about it from the start, but both of them were older and clearly not virgins so you know I have always thought they probably had a sexual relationship before the marriage and he got her knocked up and they had to get married. Just my thoughts of course.
I’ve also never thought of Stafford as a social climber. He could be of course, but I thought he did have some means of supporting her. I actually don’t have the Weir Mary Boleyn book here to brush up on him (I just ordered it coincidentally) Where was he working while they were in Calais? He also got the Gentleman Pensioner job after Anne’s death (?), I think later on he could have supported her modestly.
The last time I read Mary’s letter I got a strong impression she was sick of all of it. Two lines “I saw that all the world set so little by me” and “verily he would not forsake me to be a king” I’ve always found that entire letter a fascinating insight into Mary.

I have another question, do you think Mary wouldn’t have recognised if he was using her, even after all the sorts of people she had been exposed to at court? Does this makes Adrian Stokes a social climber also? Francis Brandon was in line to the throne at one point, certainly far more important than Mary. Or do you think both women knew their husbands were gold-diggers, and the women just wanted some security, and didn’t care?

They say Francis Brandon married Stokes to protect herself (no citations that’s just a theory I have seen here and there) Is it possible Mary married Stafford for some protection? It was probably still too early in 1534 to sense that Anne was losing her grip on Henry, but she may have been protecting herself from being trapped. Trapped in a bad marriage, trapped at court where she though no-one gave a toss about her anyway. Just a thought.

July 25, 2012
8:45 am
Avatar
Louise
Hampshire, England
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 611
Member Since:
December 5, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Olga said

Where is my feather duster? Laugh

Promises, promises!Laugh

July 25, 2012
11:59 am
Avatar
Boleyn
Kent.
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2285
Member Since:
January 3, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Olga… I’ve never at it that way before, but you could well be right. Good one..

Semper Fidelis, quod sum quod

July 25, 2012
1:41 pm
Avatar
Olga
Australia
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 766
Member Since:
October 28, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I’ll get you Louise Wink

Just re-reading my post, I’m not disagreeing with Louise. I think she’s probably right, as the Queen’s sister Mary was far above him socially and they shouldn’t have kept the relationship quiet and expected to be forgiven quickly. And yes he definitely wasn’t behaving honourably if he slept with her either. And he may well have been a social climber, whatever I like to think about their marriage.
However I don’t think he took advantage of her. Boleyn I find it difficult with historical figures like Mary, I have to think more about them because I have less information. The real treasure Mary left behind was that letter, and I think it tells us a lot about her character. Starkey called her something like “pretty, placid, unremarkable” and I disagree entirely. It’s just like the notion that AOC was stupid. Both of those women survived longer than those who chose to stay close to the court. Both of them died in a natural manner. Both of them eventually lead comfortable lives and both of them escaped Henry’s madness. They are not the actions of stupid women.

July 25, 2012
2:29 pm
Avatar
Janet
ON Canada
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 153
Member Since:
February 24, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Olga, I agree with your assessment of Mary. Whether Stafford took advantage of her and her situation or not, she was a smart girl to stay out of the craziness at court. I don’t agree with Starkey. By all accounts she was pretty but I don’t think she was placid. I think she knew how to keep her mouth shut and her eyes down. It certainly kept her out of trouble for the most part. Perhaps she was unremarkable in many ways when compared to Anne, but again, this could just be because she knew to blend into the background rather than drawing attention to herself. I don’t think that makes her placid, just smart. Smile

Forum Timezone: Europe/London
Most Users Ever Online: 214
Currently Online:
Guest(s) 1
Top Posters:
Anyanka: 2333
Boleyn: 2285
Sharon: 2114
Bella44: 933
DuchessofBrittany: 846
Mya Elise: 781
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1
Members: 425803
Moderators: 0
Admins: 1
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 13
Topics: 1679
Posts: 22775
Newest Members:
Administrators: Claire: 958