Avatar
Please consider registering
guest
sp_LogInOut Log Insp_Registration Register
Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
sp_Feed Topic RSSsp_TopicIcon
Anne Boleyn, Mary Queen of France and Margaret Queen of Scotland
November 12, 2011
3:36 pm
Avatar
Anyanka
La Belle Province
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2333
Member Since:
November 18, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I keep reading that Mary disliked Anne to the point of hatred while Margaret with her checkered matrimonal past was more than happy that Henry married Anne, even while H8 was casigating her conduct.

 

Why did Mary hate Anne? Did Anne know something about Mary's conduct in France? Or was it simply a dislike of a social climber?

 

And why did Margaret have more sympathy for thier plight? Did her marriages make her accept Henry's desires?

It's always bunnies.

November 12, 2011
4:33 pm
Avatar
Mya Elise
Ohio,US
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 781
Member Since:
May 16, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I always wondered why Mary disliked Anne. I always thought it was because she was a Katherine supporter.

• Grumble all you like, this is how it’s going to be.

November 14, 2011
8:48 am
Avatar
DuchessofBrittany
Canada
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 846
Member Since:
June 7, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I've often wondered myself about the true nature of Mary's dislike toward Anne. In Maria Perry's book Sisters to the King, she makes several mentions of Mary's emnity for Anne.

Anne was Mary's maids of honours in France. Perhaps Mary felt that one of her former servants, moving up the social ranks and marrying the King, was above reproach. I guess Mary forgot her own matrimonal issues. Charles Brandon moved his way up the social ladder by climbing into bed with the King's sister, although I doubt anyone would remind Mary of that.

Perry makes mention on page 265 that, until Anne begot an heir, Mary's son, the Earl of Lincon, was in line for succession. She had a lot at stake. Her son could be, given certain circumstances, King. Anne could ruin all that with a son, although I do not think Henry would have made Mary's son king unless he had no other option.

Perry also notes on page 267 that Mary, in East Anglia, was very much the “The French Queen.” It was a reminder that she was once equal to KOA, and Anne was not her equal in any way. Neither would she place herself in situations where she needed to acknowledge Anne as her superior. Perry equates this with Mary's constant need to feign illness and/or remove herself from court.

Mary and KOA were close. She did know her since she was a child. They were both deeply Catholic. Mary was also Henry's favourite sister, so seeing him bestow favour on someone like Anne must have angered her. At one time, Mary could do no wrong in Henry's eyes, now this affection (gifts, favours, etc.) was being placed elsewhere, and to a woman Mary viewed as reaching too high.

From reading Perry, Margaret came across as a different personality type: more carefree than Mary. Mind, Margaret was living in Scotland and did not experience the whole Henry/Anne affair close up. But her own love life was closer to that of Henry's: she loved the idea of love, even if many of her escapades did not last. I felt she was the more likable of the sisters, and someone who would empathise with Anne. 

I recommend Perry's book. I learned a lot about Mary and Margaret, and felt I understood their place in Henry's life better. Perry's book is well-researched and documented, but highly readable.

"By daily proof you shall find me to be to you both loving and kind" Anne Boleyn

November 14, 2011
9:59 am
Avatar
Sharon
Binghamton, NY
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2114
Member Since:
February 24, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Perry's book is quite intersting. 

Just to add on…Mary was fond of Wolsey.  Wolsey had saved Mary and Brandon from Henry's anger over their secret marriage in France.  She may have resented Anne for his downfall.  He fell in Oct. 1529. 

That same year, Thomas Boleyn became the Earl of Wiltshire.  At the banquet, Henry placed Anne next to him.  Anne was given precedence over the two Duchess' of Norfolk and Mary, who, as Dowager of France, had the right to be served as Queen.  I'm sure that caused quite a bit of animosity.

 Margaret, Henry, and Mary, married the first time out of a sense of duty. After that they followed their hearts. Even if their romances didn't work out, as in Henry's and Margaret's lives, they continued to search for love. I wonder where this attitude came from?

“Sisters To The King” is well worth reading.

November 14, 2011
11:51 am
Avatar
DuchessofBrittany
Canada
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 846
Member Since:
June 7, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Sharon,

I can only imagine Mary's fury over Anne being given precedence over her and the Duchess of Norfolk. She must have been livid. So, I can see why she removed herself from court, especially given that Henry was not going to give Anne up. I guess living in the country was her way of avoiding a confrontation with Anne and upsetting her brother. Although, it is known the Brandon was open with Henry about his concerns regarding the Lady Anne.

I find it interesting that Mary felt she was entitled to marry for love, and did so behind her brother's back. Yet, she could not bestow the same respect on him. I guess she hated Anne so much, so she could not. I wonder if it was another woman, who was more in line with Mary's concept of a proper future Queen, if she would have behaved differently?

Another add on: it seemed people were willing to accept the worst of Anne, even though there was no evidence to support theories of her loose sexual morals. Yet, Brandon had an acknowledge checkered marital past, with questionable judgement and common sense. I guess what's good for the goose was not good for the gander.

"By daily proof you shall find me to be to you both loving and kind" Anne Boleyn

November 14, 2011
1:35 pm
Avatar
Impish_Impulse
US Midwest
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 595
Member Since:
August 12, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Sharon said:

Margaret, Henry, and Mary, married the first time out of a sense of duty. After that they followed their hearts. Even if their romances didn’t work out, as in Henry’s and Margaret’s lives, they continued to search for love. I wonder where this attitude came from?

 

Huh, I never realized that before, but you're absolutely right. It does speak to something either in their genetic makeup or their upbringing to make them all behave like that. And as imperious as Mary was, it makes me think that had she been a monarch in her own right, she would have been very like Henry.

                        survivor ribbon                             

               "Don't knock at death's door. 

          Ring the bell and run. He hates that."    

November 14, 2011
3:29 pm
Avatar
Mya Elise
Ohio,US
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 781
Member Since:
May 16, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Maybe they saw their parent's love and wanted that? I mean wasn't it Henry VII's choice to marry Elizabeth?

Maybe Henry, Margaret, & Mary wanted that same thing? But at first they did their roles as children of the King & Queen and married who they were supposed to and then decided that since they did that already, maybe it was time to marry for love and not duty.

• Grumble all you like, this is how it’s going to be.

November 14, 2011
5:20 pm
Avatar
Impish_Impulse
US Midwest
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 595
Member Since:
August 12, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I believe Henry VII's marriage to Elizabeth of York started out very much arranged for political advantages, but from all accounts, they were fortunate enough to love each other, even though Henry's mother, Margaret Beaufort, sounds very much like the 'mother-in-law from Hell'.

Maybe they were expecting to be able to just fall in love with their arranged spouses, and resented it when that didn't happen, or when, Henry VIII especially, fell out of love? I believe H8 and KOA did love each other in the beginning, and she continued to love him even when he stopped loving her.

                        survivor ribbon                             

               "Don't knock at death's door. 

          Ring the bell and run. He hates that."    

November 15, 2011
8:31 am
Avatar
Mya Elise
Ohio,US
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 781
Member Since:
May 16, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I thought Henry (VII) chose to marry Elizabeth of York… Sorry i must of been thinking of someone else Embarassed. Um but i like the theory that Henry, Mary, & Margaret thought that maybe they would fall in love with the arranged spouses, why would they think anything else when they had their parents marriage as an example? Henry (VIII) was described as a 'hopeless romantic', maybe he and his sisters thought love was possible in every circumstance.

Oh! and about the KOA and Henry thing, where she never stopped loving him even when he stopped loving her…It seems Henry did alot of that with his wives. With Katherine, then Anne, Not Jane – she died before he had the chance to stop loving her, He never gave Anna Of Cleves the time of day except for when he saw her portrait, I'm not sure if Katheryn Howard ever really loved Henry but still, and with Catherine Parr i think she was just like a friend to him or something.

• Grumble all you like, this is how it’s going to be.

November 15, 2011
10:44 am
Avatar
DuchessofBrittany
Canada
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 846
Member Since:
June 7, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Henry did choose to marry Elizabeth, even though it was a political expedient marriage. Henry acknowledged he needed Elizabeth as a wife for two reasons: as a mechanism to create a stability for his reign and to weaken the claims of others in the Kingdom.

However, it should be noted that he took England by conquest and was crowned before his marriage. Thus ensuring his sole power.So, in the end, his took Elizabeth as his wife, as King and not as a commoner. I feel in the end, Elizabeth was his choice and they did fall in love with one another. It was a successful marriage, since their children tried to emulate this relationship.

"By daily proof you shall find me to be to you both loving and kind" Anne Boleyn

November 15, 2011
11:42 am
Avatar
Sharon
Binghamton, NY
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2114
Member Since:
February 24, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

DuchessofBrittany said:

Sharon,

I find it interesting that Mary felt she was entitled to marry for love, and did so behind her brother’s back. Yet, she could not bestow the same respect on him. I guess she hated Anne so much, so she could not. I wonder if it was another woman, who was more in line with Mary’s concept of a proper future Queen, if she would have behaved differently?

 

Duchess, 

A good point.  Mary always felt that she was entitled to marry a man of her choosing. But Mary married the man she loved after her husband died. That's the difference between Henry's situation and her own. Katherine was still very much alive. I'm sure she wanted her brother to be happily married; and I believe she thought Henry and Katherine had a good marriage.  Mary had known these two as a couple since her childhood.  She may not have thought anything of Henry taking a mistress; but his setting aside of Katherine may have felt completely wrong to Mary.  I'm sure she thought of Katherine as a permanent member of her family.  I think Mary dismissed the idea of Henry wanting to marry someone else.  Mary's strong dislike of Anne may have been because Henry flaunted her in front of the court.  Henry gave her preference over the nobilty.  He showered her with jewels while Katherine was banished from court as if she had never existed. Mary's decision to leave court was a wise one. It could have gotten really ugly with Henry. Rather than lose her brother's affection, she removed herself from the fray.

A word about Margaret.  When she wanted her divorce from Douglas, Henry was enraged.  He made her go back to him.  This was during the time he was trying to divorce Katherine.  So yes, you are correct.  What was good for the goose was not good for any of the ganders. 

 

November 15, 2011
12:59 pm
Avatar
DuchessofBrittany
Canada
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 846
Member Since:
June 7, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Sharon said:  

Duchess, 

A good point.  Mary always felt that she was entitled to marry a man of her choosing. But Mary married the man she loved after her husband died. That’s the difference between Henry’s situation and her own. Katherine was still very much alive. I’m sure she wanted her brother to be happily married; and I believe she thought Henry and Katherine had a good marriage.  Mary had known these two as a couple since her childhood.  She may not have thought anything of Henry taking a mistress; but his setting aside of Katherine may have felt completely wrong to Mary.  I’m sure she thought of Katherine as a permanent member of her family.  I think Mary dismissed the idea of Henry wanting to marry someone else.  Mary’s strong dislike of Anne may have been because Henry flaunted her in front of the court.  Henry gave her preference over the nobilty.  He showered her with jewels while Katherine was banished from court as if she had never existed. Mary’s decision to leave court was a wise one. It could have gotten really ugly with Henry. Rather than lose her brother’s affection, she removed herself from the fray.

A word about Margaret.  When she wanted her divorce from Douglas, Henry was enraged.  He made her go back to him.  This was during the time he was trying to divorce Katherine.  So yes, you are correct.  What was good for the goose was not good for any of the ganders. 

 Excellent point, Sharon. I see now how Mary differentiate between her remarriage and that of her brother. Katherine being alive was an impedment to her accepting Henry's new wife. I wonder if KOA was dead, would marry be more accepting of Anne, or would these two women still dislike one another?

I forgot about Henry ordering Margaret back to her husband. Thanks for reminding me. It makes me dislike Henry even more.

"By daily proof you shall find me to be to you both loving and kind" Anne Boleyn

November 17, 2011
12:05 pm
Avatar
Sharon
Binghamton, NY
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2114
Member Since:
February 24, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Mya-Elise. said:

I thought Henry (VII) chose to marry Elizabeth of York… Sorry i must of been thinking of someone else Embarassed. Um but i like the theory that Henry, Mary, & Margaret thought that maybe they would fall in love with the arranged spouses, why would they think anything else when they had their parents marriage as an example? Henry (VIII) was described as a ‘hopeless romantic’, maybe he and his sisters thought love was possible in every circumstance.

 

Mya-Elise,

Henry and his sisters may very well have believed that love was possible in every circumstance.  They had the right to believe they could fall in love with their arranged spouses. There were many arranged royal marriages where there was affection between king and queen. 

 What I'm trying to grasp here is their belief that they could marry their heart's desire, with no gain for England.  For previous royal families, marriage was used as a bargaining chip.   With few exceptions,  the kings of England and their siblings, married for the enhancement of their country.  The Tudor siblings wanted to be in love and marry for their own benefit, not necessarily for the benefit of England.

 There is nothing wrong with their wish to be in love with their spouses, I just wonder why the three of them believed so strongly that they should only marry the people they fell in love with.  Whether it was good for England or not, didn't seem part of the equation. 

 


DuchessofBrittany said:

 I wonder if KOA was dead, would marry be more accepting of Anne, or would these two women still dislike one another?

 

Duchess,

That is a very good question. I'm not sure if Mary would ever have accepted Anne as queen even if Katherine had died.

  Margaret lived in Scotland and was not involved in the day to day happenings of the English court.  She knew that her brother was in love with Anne. She wanted to be happy in her own marriage and that's what she wanted for Henry.  She was happy that her brother was in love.  (all this as she was moving on to husband #3.) Such was a romantic.

Anne had served Mary in France.  Mary may have thought Anne was not good enough for her brother.  It seems to me that Mary was like her brother.  She had life her way, ala Brandon, but I'm not sure if she would wish the same for Anne and Henry.  More like, do as I say, not as I do.

 

November 17, 2011
8:21 pm
Avatar
Impish_Impulse
US Midwest
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 595
Member Since:
August 12, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Sharon said:

Henry and his sisters may very well have believed that love was possible in every circumstance.  They had the right to believe they could fall in love with their arranged spouses. There were many arranged royal marriages where there was affection between king and queen. 

What I’m trying to grasp here is their belief that they could marry their heart’s desire, with no gain for England.  For previous royal families, marriage was used as a bargaining chip.   With few exceptions,  the kings of England and their siblings, married for the enhancement of their country.  The Tudor siblings wanted to be in love and marry for their own benefit, not necessarily for the benefit of England.

There is nothing wrong with their wish to be in love with their spouses, I just wonder why the three of them believed so strongly that they should only marry the people they fell in love with.  Whether it was good for England or not, didn’t seem part of the equation. 

Their beliefs do seem out of touch with their time. There was nothing wrong with falling in love with one's spouse, but I've read that the very thought of choosing a spouse based on 'carnal' feelings was considered to be extremely foolish at best, and sinful at worst. It was a 'luxury' afforded only to those too poor to have money, lands, or titles to safeguard. I remember the letter Katherine Parr wrote to Thomas Seymour after Henry's death, assuring him that her feelings for him were not based on a sudden passion of physical attraction (as it seems that would be 'bad'), but that rather she had wanted and planned to marry him before the juggernaut that was Henry VIII crashed into her life. And now that he was dead, she could continue with her previous plans. Too bad that didn't work out.

 

Anne had served Mary in France.  Mary may have thought Anne was not good enough for her brother. 

 Jane Seymour had served both KOA and AB. I've read conflicting information about whether she'd served Mary in France, but I don't believe she did. Mary died before the rise of Jane, but I question whether Mary would have rejected Jane as a suitable Queen based on her previous status as a 'servant'. Being a lady-in-waiting was actually an honor restricted to the nobility. While admittedly not the usual pool from which prospective brides for the royals were drawn, it’s not like Henry was marrying a chambermaid or milkmaid.

ETA: I realize that's not a direct response. I guess I'm saying I don't think Mary would have objected to Jane, so her scorning of Anne for having been a lady-in-waiting is either inaccurate or hypocritical. And having said that, now I'm wondering if she would have been offended by Jane accepting Henry courting her while Katharine was still alive, or if she would have written off the restoration of Katharine as no longer possible, and Jane, with her papist sympathies would have been acceptable as 'anyone other than Anne'. Which might be a whole 'nother topic.

                        survivor ribbon                             

               "Don't knock at death's door. 

          Ring the bell and run. He hates that."    

November 18, 2011
12:25 pm
Avatar
Sharon
Binghamton, NY
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2114
Member Since:
February 24, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Impish_Impulse said:

 Jane Seymour had served both KOA and AB. I’ve read conflicting information about whether she’d served Mary in France, but I don’t believe she did. Mary died before the rise of Jane, but I question whether Mary would have rejected Jane as a suitable Queen based on her previous status as a ‘servant’. Being a lady-in-waiting was actually an honor restricted to the nobility. While admittedly not the usual pool from which prospective brides for the royals were drawn, it's not like Henry was marrying a chambermaid or milkmaid.

ETA: I realize that’s not a direct response. I guess I’m saying I don’t think Mary would have objected to Jane, so her scorning of Anne for having been a lady-in-waiting is either inaccurate or hypocritical. And having said that, now I’m wondering if she would have been offended by Jane accepting Henry courting her while Katharine was still alive, or if she would have written off the restoration of Katharine as no longer possible, and Jane, with her papist sympathies would have been acceptable as ‘anyone other than Anne’. Which might be a whole ‘nother topic.

 

Impish,

 Yeah, I was conflicted over this question!

 Didn't Henry give Anne the title of Marquess of Pembroke to raise her status? Henry was honoring Anne with a title of her own; but he was also trying to raise her status in the eyes of his court and the world. That is what I meant when I said Anne was not an equal. I never meant to imply that she had the status of a milkmaid or chambermaid. Didn't mean to come off like that at all. I agree it was a great honor to be a lady-in-waiting. 

There were many at court who thought Anne was not good enough for Henry.  On general principal Mary might not have been any different.  Katherine was loved and admired by the court.  She was a princess in her own right.  Born of two great leaders of Spain. Big shoes to fill. 

Having said all that, Mary could have seen Henry's grief over Katherine's death, and been happy that he had found love with Anne.  That would have been nice.  Confused  See, conflicted!

I'll think about the whole Jane/Katherine thing tomorrow.

 

 

 

November 18, 2011
10:24 pm
Avatar
Impish_Impulse
US Midwest
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 595
Member Since:
August 12, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Sharon said:

Didn’t Henry give Anne the title of Marquess of Pembroke to raise her status? Henry was honoring Anne with a title of her own; but he was also trying to raise her status in the eyes of his court and the world. That is what I meant when I said Anne was not an equal. I never meant to imply that she had the status of a milkmaid or chambermaid. Didn’t mean to come off like that at all. I agree it was a great honor to be a lady-in-waiting. 

There were many at court who thought Anne was not good enough for Henry.  On general principal Mary might not have been any different. 

I'm sorry I msunderstood you.

                        survivor ribbon                             

               "Don't knock at death's door. 

          Ring the bell and run. He hates that."    

November 19, 2011
11:57 am
Avatar
Sharon
Binghamton, NY
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2114
Member Since:
February 24, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Impish,

I should have explained myself better the first time.  Smile

Forum Timezone: Europe/London
Most Users Ever Online: 214
Currently Online:
Guest(s) 1
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
Anyanka: 2333
Boleyn: 2285
Sharon: 2114
Bella44: 933
DuchessofBrittany: 846
Mya Elise: 781
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1
Members: 425802
Moderators: 0
Admins: 1
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 13
Topics: 1679
Posts: 22775
Newest Members:
Administrators: Claire: 958