August 19 – Mary is not going to obey her half-brother, Edward VI

Aug19,2022 #Edward VI #Mary I

On this day in Tudor history, 19th August 1551, in the reign of King Edward VI, the king’s half-sister, Mary, the future Mary I, wrote to the king regarding orders that he had sent, orders that she was not going to obey.

As historian Henry Ellis noted, this letter is evidence of Mary’s talent at writing and her intellect, and it also shows just how stubborn she could be. Unfortunately for Mary, Edward was just as stubborn. There was no way he was going to let his sister defy him. But Mary wasn’t going to compromise her faith by obeying him.

Find out more about the situation, and hear Mary’s words to Edward…


On this day in Tudor history, 19th August 1551, Princess Mary, the future Mary I, wrote to her half-brother King Edward VI. Her letter was in response to Robert Rochester, Comptroller of the Royal Household, and two of Mary’s household officers, Edward Waldegrave and Sir Francis Engelfield, being called before the king’s privy council on 14th August 1551 and being told to go to Mary’s household at Copt Hall in Essex and to tell her chaplains that the saying of Mass in her household was forbidden and that no member of her household was to hear it. The men went to Copt Hall, but did not do as they were instructed and instead brought back with them a letter from Mary to the king.
Henry Ellis, editor of Original Letters, Illustrative of English History… writes that this letter “is probably the best specimen which we have in our power to give of her talent at writing: and, with the singular Paper which follows it by way of comment, will show her to have been a woman of more intellect than the world has usually supposed.”

Here’s Mary’s letter:

“My duty most humbly remembered unto your Majesty. It may please the same to be advertised that I have by my servants received your most honorable Letter, the contents wherof do not a little trouble me, and so much the more for that any of my servants should move or attempt me in matters touching my soul, which I think the meanest subject within your Realm could evil bear at their servants hand; having for my part utterly refused heretofor to talk with them in such matters, and of all other persons least regarded them therein; to whom I have declared what I think as she which trusted that your Majesty would have suffered me your poor humble sister and beadeswoman to have used the accustomed Mass, which the King your father and mine with all his predecessors evermore used; wherein also I have been brought up from my youth, and thereunto my conscience doth not only bind me, which by no means will suffer me to think one thing and do another, but also the promise made to the Emperor by your Majesty’s Counsell was an assurance to me that in so doing I should not offend the Laws, although they seem now to qualify and deny the thing.

And at my last waiting upon your Majesty I was so bold to declare my mind and conscience to the same, and desired your Highness, rather then you should constrain me to leave the Mass, to take my life, whereunto your Majesty made me a very gentle answer.
And now I beseech your Highness to give me leave to write what I think touching your Majesty’s Letters. In deed they be signed with your own hand, and nevertheless in my opinion not your Majesty’s in effect, because it is well known (as heretofore I have declared in the presence of your Highness) that although, Our Lord be praised, your Majesty hath far more knowledge and greater guisles than others of your years, yet it is not possible that your Highness can at these years be a judge in matters of Religion. And therefore I take it that the matter in your Letter proceedeth from such as do wish those things to take place, which be most agreeable to themselves: by whose doings (your Majestynot offended) I intend not to rule my Conscience.

And thus, without molesting your Highness any further, I humbly beseech the same ever, for Gods sake, to bear with me as you have done, and not to think that by my doings or example any inconvenience might grow to your Majesty or your Realm; for I use it not after any such sort; putting no-doubt but in time to come, whether I live or die, your Majesty shall perceive mine intent is grounded upon a true love towards you, whose royal estate I beseech Almighty God long to continue, which is and shall be my daily prayer, according to my duty.

And after pardon craved of your Majesty for these rude and bold Letters, if neither at my humble suite, nor for regard of the promise made to the Emperor, your Highness will suffer and bear with me, as yon have done, till your Majesty may be a Judge herein yourself, and right understand their proceedings, (of which your goodness yet I dispair not,) otherwise, rather than to offend God and my conscience I offer my body at your will, and death shall be more welcome than life with a troubled conscience.

Most humbly beseeching your Majesty to pardon my slowness in answering your Letters, for my old disease would, not suffer me to write any sooner. And thus I pray Almighty God to keep your Majesty in all virtue and honour, with good health and long life to his pleasure. From my poor house at Copped Hall the 19 of August.
Your Majesty’s most humble sister

It is a beautifully written letter and Mary points out that promises had been made to Emperor Charles V that Mary could continue to worship in the way she wanted in private. She states that she is willing to die for her faith, rather than suffer a troubled conscience from compromising her faith. She shows courage, fortitude and a great deal of stubbornness!

But then Edward was stubborn too. Ellis explains that on 23rd August, following receipt of Mary’s letter, the same men were “directed to execute the charge they had received on the 14th” but that they declined to proceed with their charge, “Rochester and Walgrave voluntarily offering rather to endure imprisonment”. On 28th August 1551, Lord Chancellor Richard Rich, Sir Anthony Wingfield and Sir William Petre visited Mary at Copthall. The purpose of their visit was to deliver the King’s order that Mary and her household should desist from celebrating the Catholic mass, and also to inform Mary that Wingfield should replace Robert Rochester, whom Edward’s council had removed, as Mary’s comptroller.

Mary was furious with the men. She replied that she was her brother’s “most humble and obedient subject”, but that “she would lay her head on a block” before using “any other service than was used at the death of the late king, her father”. Mary rebuked the men for trying to appoint her servants, telling them that she would appoint her own. She continued, saying, “I am sickly, and yet I will not die willingly, but will do the best I can to preserve my life: but if I shall chance to die, I will protest openly, that you of the council be the causes of my death. You give me fair words, but your deeds be always ill towards me.” Mary refused to obey them and they were forced to leave, having failed their mission.

Edward and Mary loved each other as siblings, but Edward would not have his sister defy his laws and Mary would not have her brother tell her how to worship. Oh dear!

Related Post

One thought on “August 19 – Mary is not going to obey her half-brother, Edward VI”
  1. Mary’s letter to her brother is humble gracious and clearly shows her writing skills, but it was also resolute in her determination that he should realise that she was not going to stop hearing mass in her households, Edward was a boy king, had he been older and wiser he may well have been more understanding of his sisters situation, as she wrote from her youth she has been hearing mass, true to her faith poor Mary ! Once the darling of her fathers court, the religious change broke so many catholics hearts and Mary’s it seemed more than others, with her it was personal she had opposed her father for so many years and now it seems, her brothers she was well aware he was the king, but to her he was still her baby brother, and this letter irked him, did she not realise he was the king her sovereign Lord? Religion caused such a rift in households the country was still deeply Catholic in part, but many had embraced reform, it caused friction Mary however was a die hard Catholic having known no other way, Edward deplored what he called papistry having been brought up in what he deemed was the true faith, Elizabeth herself at the wishes of her mother had been brought up thus, but Mary was much older her mother the Spanish princess by nature of her birth had been Roman Catholic, Spain was still a deeply Catholic country, and she denounced the new faith as heretical, England was seen by Spain as a heretic country, and Mary was most loyal to her mother’s country, stubborn and resolute she wished it be known that she would continue to hear mass and the consequences be damned! Fast forward when she herself was queen she forced her younger sister Elizabeth to hear mass, knowing she was quite unwilling and therefore she was acting the same as Edward, but Elizabeth was good at making excuses and declared she was ill she had a headache or one day she had a stomach ache etc, the queen was annoyed for she knew Elizabeth was simply trying to get out of it, Edward although seemingly being priggish and unreasonable concerning Mary was genuinely worried about his country’s religious future, and his obliterating both sisters out of his will was to have dire consequences for many.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *