• FREE Anne Boleyn Files Welcome Pack of 5 goodies
    sent directly to your inbox Free Tudor Book



    Includes 3 Free Reports, Book List and Primary Sources List Please check your spam box if you don't receive a confirmation email. PLEASE NOTE: Your privacy is essential to us and we will not share your details with anyone.

5 May 1536 – More Men in the Tower of London

Posted By on May 5, 2013

Thomas Wyatt

Thomas Wyatt

By 5th May 1536, two further arrests had taken place: courtier, poet and diplomat Sir Thomas Wyatt, and Sir Richard Page, a Gentleman of the Privy Chamber.

Neither man was named in the indictments of May 1536 and they were subsequently released. You can find out more about Page in my article Sir Richard Page and Sir Francis Bryan, but he was a member of the privy chamber, a close friend of Anne’s and a man she had rewarded for carrying out “sundry little services”.1 Wyatt was, of course, a man who had been linked romantically with Anne before her relationship with the King – see Circa Regna Tonat – About the Throne the Thunder Rolls for more information.

Wyatt witnessed the executions of Rochford, Norris, Brereton, Weston and Smeaton from his prison in the Bell Tower and recorded his feelings in two poems, “In Mourning Wise Since Daily I Increase” and “V. Innocentia Veritas Viat Fides Circumdederunt me inimici mei”. You can read the poems at Execution Poetry.

I find it interesting that Wyatt survived Anne’s fall. In my opinion, he would have been the perfect fall guy as it would have been easy for Cromwell or the King to frame him for adultery or to claim that Anne had not been a virgin when she married the King because of a relationship with Wyatt. Surely it would have been easier to link Wyatt to Anne than linking Norris, Smeaton, Weston or Brereton to her. It appears that Wyatt was saved by the fact that he had distanced himself from Anne since her marriage and also by his father’s close relationship with Cromwell.2

Also around 5th May 1536, Sir Francis Bryan, a man ‘christened’ the “Vicar of Hell”3 by Thomas Cromwell, was ordered to London for questioning. Bryan was questioned but not arrested. He had once benefited from Anne Boleyn’s patronage and their family connection, but he was best friends with Sir Nicholas Carew and had changed to the sides of the Seymours. Was Bryan’s arrest, as Alison Weir puts it, “a charade to lend credibility to the other arrests”?4 Perhaps so. He certainly did not suffer from this ‘blip’ in his career and was chosen by the King on 19th May 1536 to inform Jane Seymour of Anne’s execution.

Notes and Sources

  1. Friedmann, Paul. Anne Boleyn. Amberley, 2010, p235
  2. We have records of Sir Henry Wyatt’s letters to Cromwell regarding his son’s imprisonment – LP x. 840 and 1131
  3. LP x. 873
  4. Weir, Alison. Henry VIII: The King and His Court, Kindle edition

6 thoughts on “5 May 1536 – More Men in the Tower of London”

  1. Dawn 1st says:

    Now you have pointed that out Claire, and I have often wondered why Wyatt ‘got away with it’, it did seem an awful long way round and a more complicated way of getting the necessary evidence against Anne, when he would have been such an easy option.

    Maybe hey were looking for a bigger impact than just a poet. Do you know if Cromwell had any personal dislikes of the other men implicated, had they upset him some how in the past? A personal slight in those days seem to fester a long time, waiting in the background until you had enough ‘clout’ to do something hard-hitting about it?

    You said Wyatt’s father had a close relationship with Cromwell, well it seems that the old saying of ‘It’s not what you know, but who you know’….was working in Wyatt’s case, thankfully.

    1. Tudorrose says:

      I agree!

  2. Tudorrose says:

    Wyatt was the “lucky” one alongside Page but so unlucky for the others. Quart was not stupid he was smart!. Twice commited and twice released!

    1. Tudorrose says:

      “Wyatt”!

  3. Wendy says:

    Cromwell was a clever man. He must have known that Wyatt was an obvious choice, and he also knew that he was innocent, As he was the son of a close friend, having him arrested and cleared served three purposes. It made the process look fair, Wyatt’s father would be indebted, and it took Wyatt out of circulation until the deed was over.

  4. M'Lady says:

    It’s not what you know but who you know seems to be the case here. What a lucky guy Wyatt was, to get out of this, when as we know others didn’t, no matter what they confessed or didn’t confess to.

Please note: Comment moderation is currently enabled so there will be a delay between when you post your comment and when it shows up.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.