Avatar
Please consider registering
guest
sp_LogInOut Log Insp_Registration Register
Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
sp_Feed Topic RSSsp_TopicIcon
Dowry, dower or Jointure?
November 25, 2010
8:54 pm
Avatar
Anyanka
La Belle Province
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2333
Member Since:
November 18, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

It was not just Jane's beauty and innocence that attracted Henry,
however. She also came with a handsome dowry: 104 manors in 19 counties,
five castles and several chases and forests.

 

http://www.essaytask.com/biogr…..30643.html

I've been looking at many online sources about Jane Seymour since Clarebear's query about Jane being at the French court*. I have come across this claim several times. It seems a lot for an improvrished knight to dower onto his daughter.

 

Other sources including Alison Weir give those figures along with the revenues of bear-pits and brothels in Southwark as part of the jointure.

 

IIRC, dowry was paid to the groom's family for the brides upkeep, dower was the monies used to support the bride during the period she was married  and jointure was paid by the groom( or his family) in order to provide for the bride after the groom's death.

Am I right to think that these figures refer to Henry's gifts and not Jane's dowry at all?

 

* Many of the sites that claim Jane was in France, claim a large dowry and Jane being married at Wulfhall. I have a seperate thread about that in the Six Wives forum.

It's always bunnies.

November 26, 2010
2:04 am
Avatar
Impish_Impulse
US Midwest
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 595
Member Since:
August 12, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Also, when was Jane ever described as beautiful?

                        survivor ribbon                             

               "Don't knock at death's door. 

          Ring the bell and run. He hates that."    

November 27, 2010
7:22 am
Avatar
Boleynfan
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 503
Member Since:
August 3, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I don't believe she was beautiful. Her portraits didn't seem beautiful and, unlike Anne, she was small, plain, and the typical English girl. Nothing special; not hideous. But not beautiful.

"Grumble all you like, this is how it's going to be"

November 27, 2010
11:09 am
Avatar
Melissa
New York City
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 162
Member Since:
July 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Jane was certainly not beautiful.  Even Chapuys said so.  I heard the figures you refer to, Anyanka, as Henry's jointure to Jane.  I forget now where I read it but I was under the impression that Jane didn't bring much to the marriage at all.

Ainsi sera, groigne qui groigne.

November 27, 2010
11:54 am
Avatar
Sharon
Binghamton, NY
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2114
Member Since:
February 24, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I think it was in Alison Weir's Henry VIII, where she says that Jane was the oldest of eight children and that her father had no dowry for her and that was one of the reasons why she was not married. Henry aquired many places that year from different people including one from Brandon.  She also says that Henry had owned the brothel.  Baynard Castle was one of the places Jane received in jointure.

Wreckmaster, are you just being polite?  I see no beauty in Jane.  I don't recall anyone ever reporting she was pretty either. The opposite was true. People said she was quite plain.

November 27, 2010
1:36 pm
Avatar
Boleynfan
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 503
Member Since:
August 3, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I agree with Sharon. When I see her portrait I don't see any beauty either; and she was constantly described as 'plain.' Certainly never 'beautiful', never even 'pretty' as much.

"Grumble all you like, this is how it's going to be"

November 29, 2010
10:12 pm
Avatar
Anyanka
La Belle Province
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2333
Member Since:
November 18, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Am I the only one who finds it strange(?) that Henry gave his bride* the revenues from brothels??

 

* since several of his wives had the same settlement.

It's always bunnies.

November 29, 2010
10:52 pm
Avatar
MegC
Georgia, US
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 426
Member Since:
October 31, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Nothing Henry did surprises me.  Revenues from brothels?  Sure–why not?

"We mustn't let our passions destroy our dreams…"

November 30, 2010
11:19 am
Avatar
Sharon
Binghamton, NY
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2114
Member Since:
February 24, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

 I read the brothel part over and over to make sure I had it right.  I figured Henry probably loved the fact that he owned a brothel.  Or maybe Kings owned things like that and no one would have given it a second thought. 

November 30, 2010
6:42 pm
Avatar
Impish_Impulse
US Midwest
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 595
Member Since:
August 12, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Sharon said:

 I read the brothel part over and over to make sure I had it right.  I figured Henry probably loved the fact that he owned a brothel.  Or maybe Kings owned things like that and no one would have given it a second thought. 


It does seem weird to me, since prostitution was illegal. I'm reading Dark Fire, and it describes how prostitutes were branded with a “w” for “wh*re” on their cheeks. Did that really happen?

                        survivor ribbon                             

               "Don't knock at death's door. 

          Ring the bell and run. He hates that."    

Forum Timezone: Europe/London
Most Users Ever Online: 214
Currently Online:
Guest(s) 1
Top Posters:
Anyanka: 2333
Boleyn: 2285
Sharon: 2114
Bella44: 933
DuchessofBrittany: 846
Mya Elise: 781
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1
Members: 425803
Moderators: 0
Admins: 1
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 13
Topics: 1679
Posts: 22775
Newest Members:
Administrators: Claire: 958