The Glorious Revolution | Historical Debates | Forum

Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
The Glorious Revolution
October 23, 2012
11:02 pm
Avatar
James33
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 81
Member Since:
August 27, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Evening All

I wanted to start a topic on something i must admit i haven’t researched personally very much ( or know very much about), however i do feel feel this particular event is one of the most important in Britain’s past, it was when we got as close as possible to choosing our Monarch, it brought in the ‘Bill of Rights’ & our current system of ‘Constitutional Monarchy’ was established where power was really passed from Crown to Parliament ( although more got passed later on).

What’s your views on this? Do you see William and Mary as usurpers or liberators? I personally see them as liberators, partly due to the fact that James was deemed to have abdicated by throwing the great seal into the Thames when fleeing & parliament did invite William and Mary to take the throne ( although William was determined to take the crown from him).

Do you guys think that this is a very important part in Britain’s history that doesn’t get focused on nearly as much as it probably should?

October 24, 2012
1:40 am
Avatar
Anyanka
La Belle Province
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2345
Member Since:
November 18, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Techincally speaking Britain as a political entity didn’t exist at the time of The Glorious Revolution. The Act of Union was passed in 1707 in Queen Anne’s reign.

It's always bunnies.

October 27, 2012
12:34 am
Avatar
Claire-Louise
UK
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 256
Member Since:
March 26, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Interesting subject, I think I would generally see them as liberators, simply due to the fact that by signing the Bill of Rights they helped ease the tensions between crown and parliament that had been so dominant in England. The Civil War had certainly bruised the country, and it certainly appears that William and Mary brought about a kind of ‘balance’. Personally I don’t think I have ever regarded them as usurpers

November 21, 2012
7:56 am
Avatar
James33
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 81
Member Since:
August 27, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I agree Claire Louise :) I think the fact that Parliament invited William & Mary to rule clearly shows they where not usurpers. The Bill of Rights was probably the main highlight of their reign, it certainly was a very progressive step that eventually other countries came to accept… I do wonder if maybe France, Russia etc had moved in this direction maybe their monarchies would still be here today!!

Forum Timezone: Europe/London

Most Users Ever Online: 70

Currently Online:
18 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Anyanka: 2345

Boleyn: 2285

Sharon: 2115

Bella44: 934

DuchessofBrittany: 847

Mya Elise: 782

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 0

Members: 426041

Moderators: 0

Admins: 1

Forum Stats:

Groups: 1

Forums: 13

Topics: 1679

Posts: 23600

Newest Members:

franklingo18, HorinadR, estherqw4, enriquebo2, Delaquand, esperanzamt3

Administrators: Claire: 998