Avatar
Please consider registering
guest
sp_LogInOut Log Insp_Registration Register
Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
sp_Feed Topic RSSsp_TopicIcon
Catherine Howard: Deathwish or Silly Girl?
November 14, 2009
7:47 pm
Avatar
Gina
Lindenhurst, USA
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 78
Member Since:
October 3, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Hello everyone!

I have been thinking a lot about Catherine Howard lately. The question that haunts me is: \”Why after what Henry did to Anne Boleyn, would she risk her life to carry on an affair\”?  Was she just completely reckless, suicidal, extremely young and naive or did she truly believe that she had Henry wrapped so tightly around her little finger that he would forgive her anything? It can't possibly be that she thought she would never get caught, can it?

It completely baffles me!

XO-Gina

November 14, 2009
8:46 pm
Avatar
Lexy
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 71
Member Since:
October 11, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I think that what played a major role was her lack of maturity. She was indeed reckless, young and naive, not twenty years old at the time of her execution after all. She probably thought that her old husband would be like her old step- grandmother. Teen agers and children often believe that adults don't notice their \”clever\” plans. After all the dowager Duchess of Norfolk hadn't notice the relationship with Derenham. So Catherine surely believed that she could sleep with her lover without problem, and, if she had bor/n Henry a son, she would have fulfilled one of his greatest desires.

November 14, 2009
9:26 pm
Avatar
Ruth M
Scotland!!!
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 16
Member Since:
November 12, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I think she was just a really naive air-head, who was her uncle's pawn. She just didn't connect herself, her adultery and Anne Boleyn. Henry seemed to love her so much that I think she thought her would let her away with absolutely anything, if she acted upset enough.

But to be honest, I don't blame her. At all. Henry was old enough to be her grandfather, let alone her father. It was extremely perverted. And he was the size of a house (at least), he stank to the high heavens, and was lame to boot. And there was dashing young Culpepper, and Henry was thrusting them together for dancing and whatnot. So no wonder she sought solace else where. And with Lady Rochford helping, a senior lady in waiting, she probably though she was doing nothing seriously wrong, the King took mistresses, did he not? (Admittedly not with her, but I can see LR feeding her that rubbish).

The poor girl was completely mislead by adults whom she trusted.

November 14, 2009
11:47 pm
Avatar
Lexy
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 71
Member Since:
October 11, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Of course, Norfolk and his right arm Jane Boleyn used her as a pawn. They needed her as a queen and they needed a son of her, a duke of York. Everybody knew that Edwardcould die at every moment, so the next king could be half Howard. There was a time where DNA test didn't exist, and nobody coud tell who was the father of a child. They used Catherine's real love for Culpeper in order to produce this much wanted baby boy. The poor girl was victim of both her family and her her youth. And of course the fact that Henry was old enough to be her grandfather is pretty disgusting. 

November 15, 2009
7:20 pm
Avatar
ipaud
Ireland
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 212
Member Since:
June 19, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I heard a definition of insanity recently;

\”doing the same thing over and over but looking for different results.\”

This could well be attributed to Henry, I do think.

While no stretch of the imagination could put the Love element into Henry and Catherine Howard's relationship, however, her eyes were not shut. The influential power wielders of Henry's court would have found a way to prevent the union if it was not going to be advantageous to them. Henry was  not expected to last too long and as he had bedroom difficulties with Anne of Cleaves, (as he was the Great King, it must have been his wife's fault!) as they say in the Spaghetti Westerns \”someone was shooting from the side\” but Catherine broke rule number one of having an affair, \”Don't get caught\” It would seem that every one was in a hurry to see the Queen pregnant.

Getting caught playing away from home as Queen to Henry meant but one thing, The Tower of London. So angry was Henry, he ordered her body covered in lime after her execution, the ultimate insult that he could give. This would seem to be true, as in the excavation of Saint Peter Ad Vincula, one body believed to be Catherine was found burned with lime.

There was a portrait of all six wives in Hampton court when I visited last May, Catherine Howard was strikingly beautiful, in my humble opinion.

Death wish or silly girl?

Don't think she had a death wish, I do believe that she was lifted from obscurity for more reasons than to keep Henry's bed warm and knew the risks and dangers she faced. Within court, it was almost impossible to keep an affair a secret. after all, Kings and Queen's lived in constant fear of being murdered even in their sleep and would never be left alone. Many people would have known what was going on and kept it well hidden from Henry and anyone who could give Catherine up to him. Silly girl for being led perhaps?

If it was not this, then it would be something else?

November 16, 2009
3:40 am
Avatar
Gina
Lindenhurst, USA
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 78
Member Since:
October 3, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I believe that for Catherine (a young, beautiful girl whose own father showed little or no interest in her) It had to be exciting to first be chosen by her powerful Uncle to be placed in front of the king. Every powerful family tried to put the most attractive girls in his path and she was the one chose. Then to be showered with love, compliments and plenty of gifts, well that had to be like Christmas every day.

I think about the stories I have read, where Henry could barely keep his hands off of her & that he would regularly paw her in front of everyone and I wonder if he resented it!  They called Anne the Concubine, I am surprised they didn't have a much worse name for her! Maybe in her mind, she was entitled to a little \”fun?\” because she had to endure the kings lust?

She was to provide an Heir and since she was a \”catholic\”, there was hope that she would return Henry to the church.  

I feel her youth, vanity and the people around her all contributed to her downfall. 

XO-Gina

November 16, 2009
4:41 am
Avatar
Sabrina
California
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 205
Member Since:
June 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I believe she thought that in her position, she could do whatever she wanted, with no consequences. She did what she wanted at her grandmother's house… What would make being queen any different? She had clothes, jewels, and men throwing themselves at her. She loved the attention, I think. I don't know if she knew what it was really like, and sad to say, it ended up being her downfall.

I don't blame her really.. Henry was past his prime when he found her, and thought she was going to restore his youth. He was sadly mistaken. I wouldn't want him to paw at me in public, and the smell of his wound? OMG. I would be soo sick from the smell. He could've just put her in a convent, but he executed her. Her family should've taken better care of her. Not throw her in the lion's den and leave her to die..

Let not my enemies sit as my jury

November 18, 2009
6:58 pm
Avatar
Gina
Lindenhurst, USA
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 78
Member Since:
October 3, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Catherine almost seemed \”dehumanized\” and became a pawn to her family's ambition and an object of lust to Henry. Sad to think that this was just a young girl.

She knew how to use her looks to manipulate men but again, I can't fault her for that! With all her disadvantages she had to use what she had. Here was everything she ever wanted and more on a silver platter. The only caveat is that she had to be the subject to Henry's bulk, stink & groping! (In my mind I think about how Elvis married Priscilla who was only 13.. but He was still handsome Elvis! not Fat, jumpsuit wearing Elvis, which would be more comparable to fat Henry! I also think about Anna Nicole Smith who married Howard Marshall II.)

I feel Henry opted to kill her because he was so deeply hurt by her betrayal. She restored his youth (in his eyes) and I am sure she fed his ego. I believe that he was so smitten with her that he felt, quite the fool when the affair came to light. There was a story that he said he wanted to take his sword and kill her himself.  

XO-Gina

November 20, 2009
8:40 pm
Avatar
MarkM
Minneapolis, MN
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 12
Member Since:
November 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I don't think she had a death wish. I think it was a matter of risk vs. reward. Lots of people risk their lives for fame and fortune. In those days she didn't have a lot of options. She probably also had a lot of pressure from her family for what it would mean for them as well.

~ Mark

November 21, 2009
2:42 pm
Avatar
Gina
Lindenhurst, USA
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 78
Member Since:
October 3, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

It's also recently occurred to me that she probably saw Henry as a weak, sick, old man. Not the imposing figure that he was when he was younger. He would be on bed rest for days on end and she wouldn't even see him at all. So maybe in her mind she figured how would he find out? 

XO-Gina 

PS Welcome MARK!

November 24, 2009
6:53 pm
Avatar
MarkM
Minneapolis, MN
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 12
Member Since:
November 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Thanks Gina!

Another thought is maybe she figured he'd die soon. 🙂

November 25, 2009
9:53 am
Avatar
Claire
Admin
Forum Posts: 958
Member Since:
February 16, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Very true, Mark. Catherine probably thought that it wouldn't be long before she was free to marry again. Welcome to the forum!

Debunking the myths about Anne Boleyn

December 18, 2009
10:20 pm
Avatar
Hannah
Belfast
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 127
Member Since:
December 8, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Another thing to bear in mind here, is that a lot of the evidence against Katherine Howard came from the affair with Dereham (her marraige to the King was annulled due to a pre-contract that existed between Howard and Dereham), wich happened before she met the King. Her affair, (if that is what it was), with Culpeper also, has doubts surrounding it. Yes, they were meeting up late at night, but theres doubt as to whether or not full sexual intercourse actually took place. Atleast, thats what David Starkey seemed to be implying in Six Wives.

Be daly prove you shalle me fynde,nTo be to you bothe lovyng and kynde,

December 22, 2009
12:55 am
Avatar
Impish_Impulse
US Midwest
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 595
Member Since:
August 12, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Hannah, I was thinking of the Starkey miniseries, too! He (Starkey) said that, when interrogated, Culpeper admitted that he loved the queen, but that the relationship had not \”passed beyond words\”. And then he threw KH under the bus, saying the queen had fallen in love with him, too, and that she was \”languishing and dying with love for him.\”, and that it had been Katherine who had sought out ways for the two of them to get together while she and the king had been on their summer progress. In the Starkey series, we then hear Culpeper saying off-screen that \”I love the queen only as a relative.\” (they were distant cousins), which would seem to claim that his feelings for Katherine weren\’t sexual, but that her feelings for him were sexual, and that she was the pursuer. Nice. What a swell guy! [/sarcasm]

                        survivor ribbon                             

               "Don't knock at death's door. 

          Ring the bell and run. He hates that."    

December 23, 2009
2:38 pm
Avatar
Claire
Admin
Forum Posts: 958
Member Since:
February 16, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I\’m having the Six Wives TV series for Christmas so I\’m now looking forward to the Catherine Howard section. I\’m also going to read Lacey Baldwin Smith\’s book on her soon so I\’ll feed back what he says about her and Culpeper. Perhaps she too was innocent, poor girl!

Debunking the myths about Anne Boleyn

January 3, 2010
5:44 pm
Avatar
Hannah
Belfast
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 127
Member Since:
December 8, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Impish_Impulse said:

Hannah, I was thinking of the Starkey miniseries, too! He (Starkey) said that, when interrogated, Culpeper admitted that he loved the queen, but that the relationship had not “passed beyond words”. And then he threw KH under the bus, saying the queen had fallen in love with him, too, and that she was “languishing and dying with love for him.”, and that it had been Katherine who had sought out ways for the two of them to get together while she and the king had been on their summer progress. In the Starkey series, we then hear Culpeper saying off-screen that “I love the queen only as a relative.” (they were distant cousins), which would seem to claim that his feelings for Katherine weren’t sexual, but that her feelings for him were sexual, and that she was the pursuer. Nice. What a swell guy! [/sarcasm]


I`ve not seen the mini-series, tbh. But in his book \”Six Queens of Henry VIII\” Starkey goes into great detail about the doubts surrounding the affairs KH was supposed to have had. Its` very interesting. On a slightly different note, I`m incensed by Michael Hirst`s decision to portray Katherine Howard as a prostitute. I`ve officially fallen out of love with the Tudors now.

Be daly prove you shalle me fynde,nTo be to you bothe lovyng and kynde,

January 4, 2010
5:58 pm
Avatar
Ruth M
Scotland!!!
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 16
Member Since:
November 12, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

About the tudors, I'm completely the same. I was in a blind rage for about a week after that episode. I thought they would of gone for the silly, self-obsessed teenage girl angle, not the teenage prostitute angle. I'm still furious.

January 5, 2010
5:20 pm
Avatar
Jasmine
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 161
Member Since:
December 30, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

The Tudors is a light entertainment programme, certainly not history, and therefore should not be taken too seriously!

January 9, 2010
8:16 pm
Avatar
Hannah
Belfast
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 127
Member Since:
December 8, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Jasmine said:

The Tudors is a light entertainment programme, certainly not history, and therefore should not be taken too seriously!


Oh yes, I realise that. I just don`t know why they felt the need to vilify Katherine Howard so badly. There`s a malicious edge to it.

Be daly prove you shalle me fynde,nTo be to you bothe lovyng and kynde,

January 18, 2010
6:34 pm
Avatar
Gina
Lindenhurst, USA
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 78
Member Since:
October 3, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I have to think that knowing what happend to Anne Boleyn, no one could have been that stupid to carry on a rampant affair under the kings nose.

I also think that Catherine is much more of a mystery than just a sl*tty, greedy, manipulative little minx that she is seems to be painted as.

The King's Rose did a great job to humanize her I think.  It is a good read for anyone who wants a diffrent take on her!

XO-Gina

Forum Timezone: Europe/London
Most Users Ever Online: 214
Currently Online:
Guest(s) 1
Top Posters:
Anyanka: 2333
Boleyn: 2285
Sharon: 2114
Bella44: 933
DuchessofBrittany: 846
Mya Elise: 781
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1
Members: 425803
Moderators: 0
Admins: 1
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 13
Topics: 1679
Posts: 22775
Newest Members:
Administrators: Claire: 958