Avatar
Please consider registering
guest
sp_LogInOut Log Insp_Registration Register
Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
sp_Feed Topic RSSsp_TopicIcon
Incest?
February 18, 2011
4:47 am
Avatar
Red Rose Chain
Ipswich, Suffolk, UK
New Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1
Member Since:
February 17, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Hi,

Does anyone know anything about the suggestion that Anne had an incestuous relationship with her brother George?

Many theories, but interested to hear what people think.

Thanks,

 

Red Rose Chain

February 18, 2011
6:08 am
Avatar
DuchessofBrittany
Canada
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 846
Member Since:
June 7, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Hello Red Rose Chain. You guys are putting on a play about Anne? I wish I lived in England to go see it. Wish you the best.

If you read Retha Warnicke's biography on Anne or Philippa Gregory's The Other Boley Girl, then there is definetly a suggestion of incest and other sexual perversions by George and Anne.

I for one do not believe it. Anne and George were close, probably best friends. They loved each other as siblings. It was only under a microscope of hysteria and fear that their relationship became incestuous. It was a mechanism to completely destroy Anne's reputation so that no one would ever advocate for her. It took over 200 years before attempts to reconcile her reputation were tried.

For instance, George visiting Anne in her room alone became perverse and sexual. A peck on the lips (which was a common occurance in the Tudor court, regardless of kinship) was a sexualized.

The whole incest story line is used for dramatic purposes (especially in fiction etc.), rather than in its true context. Henry wanted rid of Anne, which meant riding the court of her most fervent allies, namely George. A Queen who had affairs with fellow courtiers is one thing, but sex with her own brother sent it into the stratesphere. It was not a matter of killing Anne for treason, but to turn her into the Messalina everyone believed her to be. Henry was willing to play the cuckhold husband.

There is some many interesting and touching ways to write Anne and George's relationship. He was her advocate, probably the one person who loved her for her. Yes, his position rose as she became Henry's favourite. But, he always protected his sister and loved her to the end.

"By daily proof you shall find me to be to you both loving and kind" Anne Boleyn

February 18, 2011
7:44 am
Avatar
Claire
Admin
Forum Posts: 958
Member Since:
February 16, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

The whole incest idea is prevalent today because of Philippa Gregory's book, “The Other Boleyn Girl”, and the movie of the book. Gregory based her research on Retha Warnicke's work, which suggested that all of the men arrested in the coup were “libertines” and that Anne miscarried a deformed foetus which suggested sexual sin/witchcraft. The only source for Anne having miscarried a mass of flesh/deformed foetus, comes from Nicholas Sander who was only a child when Anne was alive and who was in exile during the reign of Elizabeth I because he was a Catholic. He did all he could to discredit Anne – he is the one who said she had six fingers, a “wen”, protruding teeth etc. – and his ideas are not backed up by any contemporary evidence. Even Chapuys, who hated Anne, said that she miscarried a male baby of around 3 and a half months in gestation. Chapuys also thought that Anne was innocent of the charges brought against her. Warnicke actually distanced herself from Gregory's book when it was published, as I think she felt that Gregory had gone too far, and there is absolutely no evidence that Anne and George committed incest. They were close as they were both intelligent and they both had Reformist views, although I would say that George's were more radical than Anne's. As Duchess says, George's visits to Anne's rooms were twisted to suit the charges, and also the tradition of Courtly Love, the usual flirting which went on between courtier and queen, was twisted into something it wasn't. The prosecution had to completely blacken Anne's name, they had to create a scandal to get rid of Anne once and for all.

Eric Ives, and various other historians, make the point that the Middlesex and Kent indictments make no sense in that some of the dates given are completely impossible as Anne was either in a different place, with her husband or in confinement. See /10th-may-1536-the-grand-jury-of-middlese/5323/ and /11th-may-1536-the-grand-jury-of-kent/5337/

Anyway, I guess you get the picture that, in my opinion, the charge of incest is a load of rubbish!

Debunking the myths about Anne Boleyn

February 18, 2011
10:31 am
Avatar
Anyanka
La Belle Province
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2333
Member Since:
November 18, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I totally agree, Claire. It's a load of trash.

 

Given that Anne refused H8, I just can't see her jumping into bed with any man let alone her own brother. You just need to look at today's tabloids to see how far people will twist something to make the most innocent thing into a gossip-worthy accusation against some one famous.

It's always bunnies.

February 18, 2011
10:48 pm
Avatar
iluthradanar
USA
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 5
Member Since:
February 7, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Anne and George were close because they were similar in temperament. Neither was extremely close to Mary. George had a wife whom he hated and she felt likewise enough to testify against her own husband. As was posted earlier, incest was far worse than the other accusations, since it indicated someone very perverse.

I can't believe Henry believed it, but it suited his purpose, so he went with it.

February 19, 2011
8:36 am
Avatar
Nasim
UK
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 71
Member Since:
February 3, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Red Rose Chain said:

Hi,

Does anyone know anything about the suggestion that Anne had an incestuous relationship with her brother George?

Many theories, but interested to hear what people think.

Thanks,

 

Red Rose Chain


 

According to Bishop Gilbert Burnet, writing a century after events took place, Jane Boleyn had told the authorities that there existed a ‘familiarity between the Queen and her Brother, beyond what so near a relation could justify’. Burnet insisted on Jane being complicit in the downfall of her husband and sister-in-law, arguing she was a woman ‘of no sort of vertue’.

 

I do not find Burnet’s account of events convincing. I think George was targeted for several reasons –the charge of incest was useful for its impact on Anne’s reputation encouraging the case for her destruction; George was ‘expendable’ (horrible to say, but I suspect the case), and, importantly, George and Anne may have acted inappropriately in another manner. By that I mean they may have been guilty of idle and salacious talk, by discussing the King’s impotency so brazenly. According to Chapuys, during the trial George was asked (through writing, for the court dared not speak this aloud), whether he had talked with his sister about the King’s ‘problems’ in the bedroom. The couple were also accused of joking about this (George absurdly joking that the King lacked the prowess to father a child). This of course does not mean Anne and George were lovers purely because Anne told him of her marital woes. But it was absolutely dangerous to talk about such matters and made it seem that there existed a perverse intimacy between the pair. It should be remembered that only two years after their deaths, Sir Nicholas Carew was charged with having told the marchioness of Exeter private details about the King that had taken place in the Privy Chamber (a very intimate area which only trusted servants were allowed entry into). From Henry’s perspective, if Carew was guilty of such a breach of trust, he was guilty of any other despicable deed as well. He was subsequently found guilty of other traitorous acts, condemned and beheaded.

"Much as her form seduc'd the sight,
Her eyes could ev'n more surely woo;"

February 24, 2011
10:41 am
Avatar
Claire
Admin
Forum Posts: 958
Member Since:
February 16, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Bravo, Nasim, a great explanation and I completely agree with you. Thanks for a brilliant argument!

Debunking the myths about Anne Boleyn

Forum Timezone: Europe/London
Most Users Ever Online: 214
Currently Online:
Guest(s) 1
Top Posters:
Anyanka: 2333
Boleyn: 2285
Sharon: 2114
Bella44: 933
DuchessofBrittany: 846
Mya Elise: 781
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1
Members: 425802
Moderators: 0
Admins: 1
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 13
Topics: 1679
Posts: 22775
Newest Members:
Administrators: Claire: 958