Avatar
Please consider registering
guest
sp_LogInOut Log Insp_Registration Register
Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
sp_Feed Topic RSSsp_TopicIcon
Jane Seymour - What was she like?
August 27, 2010
10:19 am
Avatar
Sharon
Binghamton, NY
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2114
Member Since:
February 24, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I don't know if Jane was ambitious or not.  I know her family took full advantage of Henry's attention to her. They were certainly ambitious.  Maybe she was as ambitious as they were.  Wasn't everyone at that court ambitious? No matter who Henry set his sights on at that time, the family would have pushed for marriage. He was done with Anne and everyone knew it.  There could be no softening of his heart this time.

The way Anne had achieved becoming Queen was well-known.  She had refused to become Henry'smistress and she had held out for the title of wife and Queen.  It worked.  It not only worked for the Boleyn family, and the Seymour family, it also worked later for the  Howard family. That is just the way these people were. Why would Jane become a mistress when she could become a wife?  Thank God that we will never be in that position, but if we were, which would you rather be?  Wife or mistress?  That is a rhetorical question, because I know we would all run for the hills.

As to Jane's loyalty….She did not like Anne.  She had no loyalty in that direction.  She was Katherine's girl.  Jane was loyal to Katherine and Mary.  By the end, she probably hated Anne, but I don't know that for sure either. If I'm not mistaken, Jane and Anne did not get along at all.  I read some where that their was a lot of slapping going on. 

I still think Jane must have had some trepidation going into this marriage.  She had to produce a son.  There was no question about that. With that kind of pressure, it is no small wonder that she appeared haughty at times.  I wonder what Henry would have done to her if Jane had lived but had produced a daughter?

August 27, 2010
11:33 am
Avatar
Boleynfan
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 503
Member Since:
August 2, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Yes, I also heard that there was no love lost between Anne and Jane. I think another difference between Anne taking Katherine's throne and Jane taking Anne's is that Anne knew Katherine less well than Jane knew Anne, and Jane knew the hardships, fears, personality etc of Anne. And Jane did the same thing Anne had done a few years before–she gets no points for originality, does she!

"Grumble all you like, this is how it's going to be"

August 27, 2010
3:33 pm
Avatar
DuchessofBrittany
Canada
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 846
Member Since:
June 7, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

As much as I see Anne as an enigma: the real Jane Seymour seems absolutely lost to time. While I do not care for Jane (probably more to do with my love of Anne than anything else), I wish there were some historical evidence about who she really was as a person, not the women she and her family wanted people to believe. “The perfect Tudor wife” seems to be a propoganda campaign by Henry and his court to set Jane as the epitome of feminine perfection, as compared to “The Concubine,” Anne Boleyn. It seems this campaign was successful in so many ways.

I believe Jane learned from the best, Anne (probably more than she would ever admit). She learned the qualities Henry wanted in a women, and utilized them to perfection. As much as it pains me to admit, an ambitious and intelligent woman.

"By daily proof you shall find me to be to you both loving and kind" Anne Boleyn

August 28, 2010
7:58 am
Avatar
Boleynfan
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 503
Member Since:
August 2, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Jane, ambitious and intelligent–definitely. But in truth kind, or a viper? What do you think?

"Grumble all you like, this is how it's going to be"

August 28, 2010
3:11 pm
Avatar
Iguazu
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 28
Member Since:
August 22, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Boleynfan said:I agree with Lady: I think Jane Seymour was wily and power-hungry, under a meek, sweet facade. Her entire family was, after all, very ambitious: how could she, growing up as a Seymour, not be? Ignoring Elizabeth and only favoring Mary shows, in my opinion, that she only favored Mary because it was politically savvy, not because she was kind.


But this is mere conjecture! Jane, as a daughter of the Seymour clan, was most probably ambitious, but this doesn't mean she cannot also have been kind and sweet.  Anne Boleyn was ambitious and vindictive, and yet at the same time she apparently was kind to a lot of people, to those that served her,  etc.  One shouldn't use double standards.

The fact that Jane may have “ignored” Elizabeth proves nothing. Elizabeth was a toddler and therefore pretty irrelevant. Queens weren't supposed to act the part of a mother, and as long as Elizabeth was cared for by her governesses, there was no need for Jane to devote time to her.

August 28, 2010
3:14 pm
Avatar
Iguazu
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 28
Member Since:
August 22, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Claire said:


 Anne kept her virtue because that's what she believed, Jane kept hers because she was copying Anne and was using it as bait. Anne followed her heart and what she believed, Jane saw a plan that worked and copied it.


But how do we know? In fact we know almost nothing about the personal motives of either queen.

August 29, 2010
7:13 pm
Avatar
Boleynfan
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 503
Member Since:
August 2, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I see your point on my and Claire's posts, Iguazu, but I agree with Claire and you say that this is mere conjecture; I agree, we can never truly know the real Jane Seymour, but I've said my guess. Also, I understand you saying that Jane didn't need to pay attention to Elizabeth, but was it fair that she singled out Mary instead of ignoring both or welcoming both into open arms?

"Grumble all you like, this is how it's going to be"

August 30, 2010
12:27 pm
Avatar
Iguazu
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 28
Member Since:
August 22, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

. Also, I understand you saying that Jane didn't need to pay attention to Elizabeth, but was it fair that she singled out Mary instead of ignoring both or welcoming both into open arms?


I don't think so because Mary was a grown woman and a political player.  At court she would have been a potential companion to the queen or somebody she could befriend. What could Jane have “done” with Elizabeth except act as a mother to her? And as I said, this wasn't the queen's role. I think Jane would have payed Elizabeth as much attention if she had been considerably older.

August 30, 2010
12:45 pm
Avatar
Boleynfan
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 503
Member Since:
August 2, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Maybe, Iguazu, but I still think Jane should have paid attention, if not equal attention, to Elizabeth. Mary might have been a grown woman and a companion, but Elizabeth was the defenseless child of her husband in a country mansion with little money. Jane, in my opinion, should have extended her “sweetness and charity” to Elizabeth.

"Grumble all you like, this is how it's going to be"

August 31, 2010
12:45 am
Avatar
Bella44
New Zealand
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 933
Member Since:
January 9, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Maybe she would have had she lived longer.  That's the thing about Jane Seymour, she'd scarcely been on the scene for eighteen months before she died, so who knows how she would have settled into her role as Queen?

August 31, 2010
7:08 am
Avatar
Boleynfan
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 503
Member Since:
August 2, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

True, Bella. She might have developed into a very good Queen, we'll never know. I believe we discussed this in another thread, but while that is probably true, I wonder if Henry would have tired of his meek Queen Jane. He called her his “true wife” but I think only because of Edward. But that's my opinion, and I think Anne was his true love.

"Grumble all you like, this is how it's going to be"

August 31, 2010
11:20 am
Avatar
Bella44
New Zealand
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 933
Member Since:
January 9, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Anne was definitely his one true love – Jane got Henry on the rebound!  But I think he would have tired of her sooner in some way or another even if she was the mother of the heir.  Henry had rather a short attention span when it came to women.

August 31, 2010
1:05 pm
Avatar
Boleynfan
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 503
Member Since:
August 2, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I think so too. The only question is: what would have happened to her? As the mother of his heir, Henry could hardly have the marriage declared null and void because then Edward would be considered illegitimate…

"Grumble all you like, this is how it's going to be"

August 31, 2010
1:36 pm
Avatar
Iguazu
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 28
Member Since:
August 22, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Boleynfan said:I think so too. The only question is: what would have happened to her? As the mother of his heir, Henry could hardly have the marriage declared null and void because then Edward would be considered illegitimate…


He wouldn't have felt the need to. He would have taken mistresses as he did when he was married to Katherine of Aragon.

August 31, 2010
1:54 pm
Avatar
Boleynfan
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 503
Member Since:
August 2, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Yes, I think so too, Iguazu.

"Grumble all you like, this is how it's going to be"

September 1, 2010
2:29 pm
Avatar
Anne Boleyn is Back
New Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2
Member Since:
September 1, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

hum

 Jane wasn't the saint she is described, but not as the bitch Anne's fans( some of them, because i'm anne fan and i do not part of this) claim. She played the same game Anne did before, but Anne, sadly wasn't a princess of a big important country as Catherine. She paid with her life, and what Jane has to do with her death? Nothing, it was Henry to decide, not Jane. The same before with Catherine. Henry abandoned her, humiliated her, separed her from her child and left her dying slowly and painfully, what Anne has directly do with this? Nothing, again was Henry's hand on the matter. So blame the wives sounds quite strange to me.

About Mary and Elizabeth. Princess Mary was grow up girl, but she suffered too much to be cast aside and the people (as well Europe) still recognized her as Princess Mary, she was a important piece and Jane knew it, Elizabeth was seen as the bastard daughter, daughter of the “witch”, daughter of the “traitor”. Jane was doing her best to show how opposite of Anne she was, why she would bring Anne's daughter so soon to court and care her? non-sense of her part. But i belive, that her act to invite Elizabeth to prince Edward's christining was a proof that she would care for the poor child.

I may not be a lion, but i'm a lion's cub and i have a lion's heart.

September 3, 2010
12:48 pm
Avatar
Sharon
Binghamton, NY
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2114
Member Since:
February 24, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Bella44 said:Anne was definitely his one true love – Jane got Henry on the rebound!  But I think he would have tired of her sooner in some way or another even if she was the mother of the heir.  Henry had rather a short attention span when it came to women.


Jane would have had to have been very careful and very quiet had she lived.  By this time Henry was an explosion waiting to happen.  She would have had to walk on eggshells around him.  Edward would have been shipped out as all children were.  Knowing Henry, he would have wanted more than one son from Jane.  If she didn't continue producing boys, he would have tired of her. Around this time is when he started having bouts of impotence.  Jane would have been blamed for that, you can bet on it. There were no rumors of other women as mistresses after Jane.  Only women who would be potential brides.  Her death was unfortunate because we will never know what might have happened in their marriage, and I would never wish a person dead, but I”m thinking she lucked out by dying. 

September 3, 2010
1:53 pm
Avatar
Boleynfan
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 503
Member Since:
August 2, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

What do you think would have happened to Jane? Henry could hardly divorce her, not after she had given him Edward! And he didn't really want mistresses, so would they have lived happily? Or would they have been all but estranged? I wonder…

"Grumble all you like, this is how it's going to be"

September 4, 2010
6:34 pm
Avatar
Noelle7
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 17
Member Since:
August 2, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I think that Henry would have grown tired of her eventually. I think that he liked having his ego flattered by Jane's submission to his will but he would have become sick of it. She'd be just one more person who said what he wanted to hear. He could not speak to her as an equal, he could not debate things with her, he could not have a witty tete a tete, he would have become bored. However, I don't think that his boredom with Jane would have led to a divorce so long as Edward survived. If Edward had died before Henry and Jane did not give birth to another living son, then Henry may have divorced her. I can't see Jane going to a convent for all her prostrations of meekness. Who knows maybe she would have met a fate akin to Anne's?

September 5, 2010
6:30 pm
Avatar
Boleynfan
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 503
Member Since:
August 2, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I definitely agree that Henry would have grown bored. Jane was, well, boring compared to our Anne! After ten years of Anne, who could permenantly settle for Jane? Not Henry, I'm sure of that. But she couldn't have met a fate akin to Anne's because then where would Edward stand? Henry could not risk his son being declared illegitimate. But if Edward would have died, I'm sure Jane would have “committed adultery” or had a “pre-marriage contract” so that her marriage was no true marriage ;). Like you said, Noelle7, Henry liked flattery and submission to his will but he already had that from all his courtiers, he didn't need it for the rest of his life from his wife as well.

"Grumble all you like, this is how it's going to be"

Forum Timezone: Europe/London
Most Users Ever Online: 214
Currently Online:
Guest(s) 1
Top Posters:
Anyanka: 2333
Boleyn: 2285
Sharon: 2114
Bella44: 933
DuchessofBrittany: 846
Mya Elise: 781
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1
Members: 425962
Moderators: 0
Admins: 1
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 13
Topics: 1679
Posts: 22775
Newest Members:
selenasw60, amaliaqy60, RobertRam, FredTip, judithqp18, Brandontouts
Administrators: Claire: 958