Avatar
Please consider registering
guest
sp_LogInOut Log Insp_Registration Register
Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
sp_Feed Topic RSSsp_TopicIcon
Catherine Parr
March 19, 2010
6:57 pm
Avatar
HannahL
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 137
Member Since:
March 12, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Ok, so I'm about to finish “The Wives of Henry VIII” by Antonia Fraser, and I've discovered that Catherine Parr is so underrated in the history world!  She was a truly brilliant woman.  Several of her qualities…such as her love of fashion, her strong Protestant beliefs, her seemingly genuine love of the children in her life, and her sharp mind…remind me of the Anne we all love so much!  Now I definitely want to buy Linda Porter's biography on her.  I think that Anne and Catherine Parr would've been friends had they come in contact with each other during their lives.  What are everyone else's thoughts on the sixth wife?  Wink

March 19, 2010
11:31 pm
Avatar
Bella44
New Zealand
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 933
Member Since:
January 9, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

After Anne, Catherine Parr is my favourite of the wives.  And you're right – she has been overlooked, being remembered primarily as the one who 'survived' though her life had been full of drama even before she married Henry!

I can't wait for Linda Porters new book either, though unfortunately I might have to wait a while.  Frown     I do have the Susan James biography which I thoroughly recommend and Elizabeth Norton has written a book on her too.  It seems to have taken a while but maybe Catherine is getting her moment to shine!  Laugh

Can't wait to see Joely Richardsons' portrayal of her in The Tudors, either!

March 20, 2010
10:19 am
Avatar
Claire
Admin
Forum Posts: 958
Member Since:
February 16, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Yes, Catherine Parr is suddenly trendy, what with Elizabeth Norton and Linda Porter writing about her in the past couple of months. I've nearly finished the Linda Porter one and I'm really enjoying it, it was great to get an insight into her early life and her first two marriages. I think history has done her an injustice by painting her as some kind of nursemaid to Henry and also by suggesting that Seymour only married her for her money.

I am really glad that Catherine is being examined by historians and brought to life, she has replaced Catherine of Aragon as my second favourite wife.

I think Joely Richardson will be a great Catherine Parr as she is a superb actress, plus she is also elegant and attractive.

Debunking the myths about Anne Boleyn

March 20, 2010
10:26 am
Avatar
Claire
Admin
Forum Posts: 958
Member Since:
February 16, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Hannah said: Several of her qualities…such as her love of fashion, her strong Protestant beliefs, her seemingly genuine love of the children in her life, and her sharp mind…remind me of the Anne we all love so much! 


I agree with you, Hannah. Henry definitely wanted to be sensible in his choice of sixth wife after such a disastrous 5th marriage to such a young woman. Catherine was attractive, intelligent and she'd done a great job at being a mother to her stepchildren, Lord Latimer's children, so she was ideal wife material. I think Henry craved the relationship he'd had with Anne, the intelligent debates they'd had, the partnership they'd enjoyed, and Catherine could offer him that without the quick temper that Anne had had. Catherine's religious fervour did nearly cost her her life and Elizabeth Norton wonders if this was a test from Henry, rather than simply a conspiracy against Catherin, but whatever the truth of the matter, Catherine's quick thinking and her knowledge of the King's psyche saved her.

Debunking the myths about Anne Boleyn

June 4, 2010
11:12 pm
Avatar
Sabrina
California
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 205
Member Since:
June 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I haven't read too much about Catherine Parr, save for Starkey's book. Even from that, she is very interesting. I admire what she did for Henry's children, and that she was a published author in her own time. She seems more than the “nurse” that the Victorians made her out to be. I will have to add the new biographies that have come out to my amazon wishlist..

Let not my enemies sit as my jury

June 5, 2010
2:52 pm
Avatar
Bella44
New Zealand
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 933
Member Since:
January 9, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I'd have to rate the Susan James one over Linda Porter – she goes into more detail.  But they're both excellent!!

June 9, 2010
6:17 pm
Avatar
joeyramone
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 17
Member Since:
June 7, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Personally she is my second fave of the wives – and it saddens me to know that she married so many times for duty and when she finally fell in real love she had to wait to be with him because of Henry and that she had such a short time with Thomas Seymour the man she was in love with because of Henrys selfishness.  It is even sadder then what Seymour did to her after she had married him.

June 10, 2010
11:50 am
Avatar
Sharon
Binghamton, NY
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2114
Member Since:
February 24, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I have just read Elizabeth Norton's comments dealing with Catherine's impending arrest.  When Catherine was in trouble, there suddenly appears a copy of the charges against her for someone in her household to find and show her.  That couldn't have been accidental.  He also tells her friend, Dr. Butts, what is going on.  Henry swears Butts to secrecy, but then sends him to her when he hears her crying.  I am assuming he wanted Butts to warn her and calm her.

When Anne and CH were being investigated, Henry refused to see them. He shipped COA out and would not speak to her once he decided to marry Anne.  He would not see AOC once he decided to divorce her. Yet, when it came to Catherine, he allowed her to explain herself to him.  She was intelligent enough to see through Henry's ploy and deferred to his beliefs by saying she was trying to get his mind off his pain. 

I realize Henry was playing a game here, but still, he allowed her to come before him and clear up the charges.  When it comes to his wives, his action toward this wife is a out of character.  I have to assume that he held Catherine in high esteem.  She had brought his family together.  He genuinely seems to have cared for her.

June 10, 2010
3:19 pm
Avatar
Impish_Impulse
US Midwest
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 595
Member Since:
August 12, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

He might have been running out of women who'd have him, too, maybe. Maybe he knew he was running out of time and just wanted to her to back down, not go away. Typical of Henry to over-do making his point, though.

ETA: He was probably grumbling in his mind, “Jane wouldn't have made me do that. All I had to do was snap at her and she backed right down. I miss Jane…”

                        survivor ribbon                             

               "Don't knock at death's door. 

          Ring the bell and run. He hates that."    

Forum Timezone: Europe/London
Most Users Ever Online: 214
Currently Online:
Guest(s) 1
Top Posters:
Anyanka: 2333
Boleyn: 2285
Sharon: 2114
Bella44: 933
DuchessofBrittany: 846
Mya Elise: 781
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1
Members: 425907
Moderators: 0
Admins: 1
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 13
Topics: 1679
Posts: 22775
Newest Members:
Guallgappartner, angelinacv69, leolaqn11, AlbertoNub, marcihq3, EsbePepus
Administrators: Claire: 958