Avatar
Please consider registering
guest
sp_LogInOut Log Insp_Registration Register
Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
sp_Feed Topic RSSsp_TopicIcon
Fictional Portrayals of Historical Figures
July 12, 2012
12:05 am
Avatar
Boleyn
Kent.
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2285
Member Since:
January 3, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Sharon said

Anne of Cleves was no dummy. I love her. I’m pretty sure she knew what was supposed to happen in the bedroom. I think she was hiding a smile as she told Jane they made love. Henry kissed her every night and when he left he kissed her. “Good night sweetheart.” That always cracked me up. I’ve often wondered if Anne and Henry didn’t concoct the story so they both could be free. How would she be able to marry again if the reason for the divorce was a precontract with the Duke of Lorraine? Doesn’t that put a damper on any future marriage for her?

AOC is yet another Enigma which is all part and package of what was called Henry 8th. Not as educated as KOA or AB, but certainly not an idiot either. She would have been taught the basics to what was a woman’s roll in life, in short prayer, needlework, painting and having babies.
I actually love the way sex was described to Anne in The Tudors. “He must put his member in you and stir it” I found that quite funny, but at the same time sort of sweet if that makes sence. Certainly I think AOC showed a brilliant sence of diplomancy when Henry wanted out of the marriage. I don’t think she would have wanted to remarry even if she could, she was happy with what she was given from Henry, and again would have known that if she did remarry she would lose most if not all of those privlages Henry had given her. She was a Lady of some wealth and status because of it, and certainly fared a lot better than she would have done if she had returned to her brother’s court in Cleves.
Of all the Queens Henry had she was perhaps the most astute and tackful when it came to marriage with Henry. She got out with her head still attached to her shoulders and with a generous settlement without fuss. Once the dust settled she kept her head down and her mouth shut, the result being she died peacefully.

Semper Fidelis, quod sum quod

July 12, 2012
12:16 am
Avatar
Anyanka
La Belle Province
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2333
Member Since:
November 18, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

There was an act prepared but it was never passed (Joanna Denney Katherine Howard p246) IIRC, it wasn’t signed but the greal seal affixed and the legal phrase The King wishes this in French.

When Mary ascended the throne, she reversed some of the acts against her mother’s supporters and KH’s , since it wasn’t actually signed.

It's always bunnies.

July 12, 2012
12:36 pm
Avatar
Olga
Australia
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 766
Member Since:
October 28, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Purely an opinion here, but I think Henry may have been “learning from past mistakes” He didn’t put Katherine away quickly enough and she put up a fight for seven years which garnered sympathy for her and hindered Henry. So off with Anne’s head, but again, she had her say at the trial which in turn garnered sympathy for her. So with little Catherine, no trial, and off with her head. That’s just a thought.

You know one thing I loved in the Tudors? Will Somers and Henry. Although it was purely fictional, obviously a fool had more creative license when addressing his Monarch, it was an excellent episode and I loved their performances.
When I actually read the expensive out of print book on Court Fools I purchased I’ll let you all know if I find anything interesting in there. I have another I am hunting down, again expensive and out of print. Idea courtesy of Ms. Gregory’s bibliographies and her deep pockets.

July 12, 2012
1:41 pm
Avatar
Boleyn
Kent.
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2285
Member Since:
January 3, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Olga: Henry and Will Somers freindship is a bit of a strange one to me. I rather think Will was perhaps sometimes the voice of common sence where Henry was concerned. I did find Will’s portrayal quite funny in the Tudors, and I sort of get the feeling it was possible it was like that in real life too.
Will was Henry’s shoulder to cry on, and used his humour to soothe Henry’s wounds. Where as Henry’s Yes men told Henry what he wanted to hear Will told Henry what he thought about a situation and what his opinion to a situation was.
In much the same way as Cecil’s relationship was with Elizabeth. Perhaps this is something that Elizabeth witnessed as a child and it made an impression on her.
Cecil and Elizabeth did have a volatile but constructive relationship, and many was the time that his temper towards forgien policy or some other diplomatic problem that occured made Elizabeth see reason and proceed with tact and diplomancy.

Semper Fidelis, quod sum quod

July 12, 2012
1:43 pm
Avatar
Louise
Hampshire, England
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 611
Member Since:
December 5, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Olga,have you come across Abebooks? They specialise in out of print books at reasonable prices. The books are basically scanned which is how they can do them so cheap. But try them first off if you need a specific out of print book. I’ve ordered loads of stuff from them.

July 12, 2012
2:47 pm
Avatar
Mya Elise
Ohio,US
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 781
Member Since:
May 16, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I really don’t understand how PG comes up with everything she writes about. It’s like she has this unknown unreliable source that she feels is the Holy Grail for Tudor history. She makes up characters and while your reading you think you’ve figured out the personality of the characters and then in some point of the book she completely twists everything around….like with Mary Boleyn, Mary was portrayed as this obeident, nice, unaware girl in TOBG then in The Boleyn inheritance I got the feeling PG wanted to make her look bad through Jane Parker’s eyes and therefore our eyes…I can’t clearly explain it but it’s like PG pretends to be so fascinated with Tudor history yet wants to make everyone have bad feelings towards it..(?)

• Grumble all you like, this is how it’s going to be.

July 12, 2012
3:59 pm
Avatar
Olga
Australia
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 766
Member Since:
October 28, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Boleyn I don’t know how close they were, the main mention I see of Will Somers in non-fiction is when Henry gave him a slap for calling Anne a bawd and Elizabeth a bastard. Although I did see Joanna Denny claim henry had him murdered too, which is not true Laugh I think he retired when Elizabeth’s reign began, and I think he got to live quite a full life. But for the most part, yes, I think he told Henry what he liked.

Louise I do shop on abe, I got my History of Court Fools by Doran there for a decent price, but the Social History of the Fool by Sandra Billington is really difficult to get. There’s only two copies at the moment, one is $130 and the other $200 odd. I can be patient though, I should be able to get a copy cheaper than that if I wait. It’s a 1980’s book as opposed to the other book which is an 1880’s book.

Mya I don’t agree at all she wants to make people have bad feelings towards Tudor history, whether or not you or I agree with her opinions VS actual history. Yeah, she is heavily influenced by Warnicke and Weir, but most fiction authors will make choices about what to use and how to use it.
As for the differing personalities of Mary Boleyn in TOBG as opposed to TBI, well the books are written in first person, from the POV of two different characters. Jane Boleyn was portrayed as being jealous of all three siblings in TOBG, which carries on into TBI, which flows fine from one book to another. She pretty much made that her motivation for testifying. If TBI is more sympathetic towards Jane it’s because it’s from her POV, it’s difficult not to have sympathy for any character when you’re reading in first person.

July 20, 2012
1:07 pm
Avatar
Anne fan
Leicestershire
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 123
Member Since:
February 10, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Margaret Campbell Barnes wrote a great book about Will Somers and then there was Margaret George, of course.

Off the top of my head (so this probably needs checking out!) I remember that he was painted with Henry in Henry’s privy chambers for Henry’s psalter, which probably indicates they were close. Non-flattering portrait for the pair of them but it feels very cosy and domestic as Will listens to Henry playing the harp. He is also in the Tudor dynasty portrait which has Henry, Edward and Jane in the centre and Mary and Elizabeth to each side. I think he was also given a place of honour in Mary I’s coronation procession and he attended Elizabeth’s coronation. I got the impression that he was part of the furniture and that they couldn’t imagine life without him. Given how disfunctional a family they were I think that’s rather sweet.

Olga is right that fiction authors pick and choose what we use. It’s because there are so many arguments (because we don’t know) that you have to choose one – and sometimes the initial choice you make means you’re funnelled into later choices.

July 22, 2012
12:21 am
Avatar
Olga
Australia
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 766
Member Since:
October 28, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Anne fan said

Olga is right that fiction authors pick and choose what we use. It’s because there are so many arguments (because we don’t know) that you have to choose one – and sometimes the initial choice you make means you’re funnelled into later choices.

I haven’t actually thought about it in that sense, but I can see where you might actually write yourself into a corner.
I actually have the books by Margaret George and Campbell Barnes, I was a little curious to see about some of the Queen’s fools as well. Anne’s, for example, she doesn’t seem to be mentioned much in anything I have read so far. But court fools in general fascinate me. I don’t think they get enough attention to be honest.

July 24, 2012
3:04 pm
Avatar
boswellbaxter
North Carolina, USA
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 16
Member Since:
April 1, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Olga, you might want to check out John Southworth’s Fools & Jesters at the English Court. It’s easy to get hold of.

July 24, 2012
3:58 pm
Avatar
Boleyn
Kent.
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2285
Member Since:
January 3, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

boswellbaxter said

Olga, you might want to check out John Southworth’s Fools & Jesters at the English Court. It’s easy to get hold of.

Thanks for that Boswell Baxter I’ll check that one out.. Welcome aboard by the way, we are a freindly and very mixed bunch of people, enjoy lively debate and sharing the odd joke or 2 too.. I look forward to reading your posts…

Semper Fidelis, quod sum quod

July 24, 2012
5:06 pm
Avatar
Neil Kemp
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 447
Member Since:
April 11, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Olga and Boleyn, also check out Anna Whitelock, author of “Mary Tudor England’s first Queen”. She has written an article on court fools of this period and is a well regarded Tudor historian. She also lists some books available on this subject (including Fools and Jesters..). A female fool, known as Jane the Fool is also depicted in the painting with Will somers, Henry and family and I believe Anna gives some backround to this as well.

July 25, 2012
1:58 am
Avatar
Olga
Australia
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 766
Member Since:
October 28, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Thank you Susan, I’ll have a look for that. And thanks Neil, should I have a look on Google for that article? Last time I was looking up Will Somers I got some books from the 1600’s, slightly out of my price range.

July 25, 2012
6:26 am
Avatar
boswellbaxter
North Carolina, USA
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 16
Member Since:
April 1, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Thanks, Boleyn, for the welcome! You and Olga might have seen this article already, but here it is just in case:

http://www.historytoday.com/su…..%99s-fools

July 25, 2012
9:12 am
Avatar
Neil Kemp
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 447
Member Since:
April 11, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Olga, yes google is a good place to start. if you google Anna Whitelock and click on the link Jesters then you will find the article in question. Susan’s link to the fabulous Suzannah Lipscomb is also a must see if you haven’t read this already. Cheers.

July 25, 2012
9:21 am
Avatar
Neil Kemp
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 447
Member Since:
April 11, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

P.S. Welcome to the forum, Susan. Many of us here like historical fiction and I’m sure you will provide us with a valuable insight into the historical research that goes into constructing a well written book on the subject. I look forward to reading your views and opinions on the many and varied topics that spring up on this forum.

July 25, 2012
12:23 pm
Avatar
Boleyn
Kent.
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2285
Member Since:
January 3, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Mya Elise said

I really don’t understand how PG comes up with everything she writes about. It’s like she has this unknown unreliable source that she feels is the Holy Grail for Tudor history. She makes up characters and while your reading you think you’ve figured out the personality of the characters and then in some point of the book she completely twists everything around….like with Mary Boleyn, Mary was portrayed as this obeident, nice, unaware girl in TOBG then in The Boleyn inheritance I got the feeling PG wanted to make her look bad through Jane Parker’s eyes and therefore our eyes…I can’t clearly explain it but it’s like PG pretends to be so fascinated with Tudor history yet wants to make everyone have bad feelings towards it..(?)

SWMNBN invents things, to put in her books.. The trouble is there is a lot of space between her ears and a little brain to rattle about in it.
I agree that the way Mary has been portrayed in TOBG is sweet to the point of being almost sickly.

In real life I can’t believe she was like that. Like Anne I believe Mary might have had a temper but not to the extent of Anne’s. I can see Mary and Anne having the odd cat fight with each other when they were younger. Me and my brother were always having hissy fits at one another, it was all part and package of growing up. These days of course we have a mutral respect and love for each other.

Maggie was kind enough to share the radio interview that SWMNBN did a few weeks back and I afraid I was rather spitting feathers when I listened to it. In short she hasn’t got a clue. It’s like she has a very negative attitude and hatred for Tudor history. Perhaps she’s jealous that Anne who was really from common stock made such a big impression on the world…

Haven’t seen you on for a while, Hope you are ok? We all still trundling along doing what we can to survive..

Semper Fidelis, quod sum quod

July 26, 2012
2:22 am
Avatar
Olga
Australia
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 766
Member Since:
October 28, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Thanks again Neil and Susan :).

Now speaking of Susan and historical figures and Francis Brandon…

Ok I have only read one other fictional book on Jane Grey and Francis Brandon besides her Highness the Traitor (such a brilliant book, thanks Susan) which was Weir’s Innocent Traitor. I didn’t mind it, but man was Francis an outrageous monster in it. I just read the first chapter of Weir’s latest book (I think I’ll get back to it later) and she’s got Francis shrieking and whipping Jane every three minutes again. It’s pretty OTT in this one too.
So when I started Susan’s book I was waiting for Francis to turn into Godzilla, and after 100 pages or so I was like “oooh” (it was quite funny really, I was almost perplexed)
I loved the portrayal of all the women in that book. I also loved that Jane was actually a bit of a brat in it (because really when we look at the actual history some of the things she did were pretty disrespectful) The whole spin of Francis feeling uncomfortable around her was fantastic, where Francis felt inferior to everyone, leading to her attraction to Stokes.
Does anyone remember the movie with Helena Bonham Carter? I saw it sometime last year but for the life of me I can’t remember what the parents were like in it.

July 26, 2012
1:18 pm
Avatar
Bill1978
Australia
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 476
Member Since:
April 9, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Mum ordered Jane to be flogged for resisting marrying Guildford and they looked down on Jane cause she preferred to read instead of hunt. By the end of the movie though, Dad is still gung ho about keeping Jane on the throne to advance his position, while Mum clearly regrets sing Jane as a pawn. So I guess with the movie, at the time Frances was still considered a hard mother but the movie tried to give some sort of motherly bond by the end of the film.

July 26, 2012
4:02 pm
Avatar
Boleyn
Kent.
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2285
Member Since:
January 3, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Olga said

Thanks again Neil and Susan :).

Now speaking of Susan and historical figures and Francis Brandon…

Ok I have only read one other fictional book on Jane Grey and Francis Brandon besides her Highness the Traitor (such a brilliant book, thanks Susan) which was Weir’s Innocent Traitor. I didn’t mind it, but man was Francis an outrageous monster in it. I just read the first chapter of Weir’s latest book (I think I’ll get back to it later) and she’s got Francis shrieking and whipping Jane every three minutes again. It’s pretty OTT in this one too.
So when I started Susan’s book I was waiting for Francis to turn into Godzilla, and after 100 pages or so I was like “oooh” (it was quite funny really, I was almost perplexed)
I loved the portrayal of all the women in that book. I also loved that Jane was actually a bit of a brat in it (because really when we look at the actual history some of the things she did were pretty disrespectful) The whole spin of Francis feeling uncomfortable around her was fantastic, where Francis felt inferior to everyone, leading to her attraction to Stokes.
Does anyone remember the movie with Helena Bonham Carter? I saw it sometime last year but for the life of me I can’t remember what the parents were like in it.

If you want to way over the top and bang out of order fiction about the Brandon/Suffolk household. Read 5 Gold rings, by Norah Lofts? Somewhere in it where Jane says she doesn’t want to marry Guildford apart from being beaten almost senceless, by her mum, locked in the Attic for days on end and starved into submission, and her father rapes her as well just to make sure she will go through with the wedding!!!!! It’s a long time sice I read the book but if I remember it right her father said to her to her after he raped her I hope a child springs forth from your womb as a result of our coupling you are a comely wench I’m sure Guildford will be happy to share you..
Just as well it was a work of pure fiction, because if it was written by a expert Historian I’m afraid I would have had to track them down and make them eat their own buttocks, with neither grace or gravy..Followed by a book flambe.
Having said that I did quite enjoy the book.

Semper Fidelis, quod sum quod

Forum Timezone: Europe/London
Most Users Ever Online: 214
Currently Online:
Guest(s) 1
Top Posters:
Anyanka: 2333
Boleyn: 2285
Sharon: 2114
Bella44: 933
DuchessofBrittany: 846
Mya Elise: 781
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1
Members: 425803
Moderators: 0
Admins: 1
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 13
Topics: 1679
Posts: 22775
Newest Members:
Administrators: Claire: 958