Avatar
Please consider registering
guest
sp_LogInOut Log Insp_Registration Register
Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
sp_Feed Topic RSSsp_TopicIcon
Was Katherine of Aragon a virgin?
July 17, 2011
11:26 am
Avatar
E
Member
Banned
Forum Posts: 256
Member Since:
May 19, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Hhmm… I am inclined to believe she was not a virgin when she went to Henry- but why would he never talk about it?

Katherine proved to be quite decietul at times- she lied to her father regarding a miscarriage- or was it that she thought she was pregnant but wasn't? Anyway, she neglected for about 3months after the event to tell her father she was not with child..

Her nature was quite nasty when the King of Scots was killed- she wanted to send Henry the kings head and then feigned concern for the widow- not the most honest…

At the time it was not so much in her best interests to proclaim her virginity. Maybe Don Elvira was a bit of a psychic or something- her name is certainly suitable! Do you think Katherine regretted insisting upon her 'virginity' in the later years of her marriage to Henry?..

"A fresh young damsel, who could trip and go"

July 17, 2011
11:49 am
Avatar
Catalina
Scotland
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 98
Member Since:
July 17, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

E said:

Hhmm… I am inclined to believe she was not a virgin when she went to Henry- but why would he never talk about it?

Katherine proved to be quite decietul at times- she lied to her father regarding a miscarriage- or was it that she thought she was pregnant but wasn't? Anyway, she neglected for about 3months after the event to tell her father she was not with child..

Her nature was quite nasty when the King of Scots was killed- she wanted to send Henry the kings head and then feigned concern for the widow- not the most honest…

At the time it was not so much in her best interests to proclaim her virginity. Maybe Don Elvira was a bit of a psychic or something- her name is certainly suitable! Do you think Katherine regretted insisting upon her 'virginity' in the later years of her marriage to Henry?..


I don't think Katherine ever regretted marriage to Henry, not for a second. I believe she truly loved him, truly believed that she was his true wife and completely and utterly believed in the sanctity of marriage.  Which leads me to the question re her virginity.  Given her character, I do not believe she would have lied about her virginity. 

As has been previously stated, I think the remark Arthur made about 'being in the midst of Spain' seems too much like the bragging of a teenager trying to cover up his inexperience. Seems like such a contrived remark.

'If honour were profitable, everybody would be honourable'  Thomas More

July 17, 2011
12:50 pm
Avatar
Anyanka
La Belle Province
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2333
Member Since:
November 18, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

E said:

Hhmm… I am inclined to believe she was not a virgin when she went to Henry- but why would he never talk about it?

Katherine proved to be quite decietul at times- she lied to her father regarding a miscarriage- or was it that she thought she was pregnant but wasn't? Anyway, she neglected for about 3months after the event to tell her father she was not with child..


Indeed, she told Ferdinand several months after her first m/c implying that it had happened recently.

It's always bunnies.

July 17, 2011
1:08 pm
Avatar
Louise
Hampshire, England
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 611
Member Since:
December 5, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Catalina said:

I don't think Katherine ever regretted marriage to Henry, not for a second. I believe she truly loved him, truly believed that she was his true wife and completely and utterly believed in the sanctity of marriage.  Which leads me to the question re her virginity.  Given her character, I do not believe she would have lied about her virginity. 
As has been previously stated, I think the remark Arthur made about 'being in the midst of Spain' seems too much like the bragging of a teenager trying to cover up his inexperience. Seems like such a contrived remark.


Hello Catalina and welcome to the site.

I love and respect Anne Boleyn but I also respect Catherine of Aragon. I think she was an extraordinary woman. I too have difficulty in accepting she would jeopardize her immortal sole by lying.

August 15, 2011
8:50 pm
Avatar
Kelly
Holland
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 28
Member Since:
January 10, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Oke. I am sorry people, i am reading this for the first time. And yes here i go again!

 

And again i am going to bore you with the education of Katherina of Aragon at the court of Castile, her mother and father (although her father had many affairs and bastard children, who Isabella raised at court), the education Isabella gave to her daughters did not include education in sex, Isabella, her daughters and the ladies in waiting were sleeping all together in the same space, no men were allowed. If there had to come a man in the chamber (for example a doctor when someone was sick), all the woman needed to be dressed to the fullest. Isabella was very prudent, there was no talk in the difference between genitals between man and woman, so you can bet that the talk about sex itself was out of the question. Also Isabella was shocked when Columbus presented her with slaves from the qonqeust he made to be bare naked.

 

Isabella and Juana were shocked when Juana arrived in Flanders and see so much loose behavior and so much openess. Juana herself held no contact but the ambasadors who reported to Isabel did not know how to tell the Queen about the loose and obscene behaviour Juana was living in.

 

The woman were raised to bear children, but not how to make children (long live the bio i have read!). To me it makes sense that Arthur was lying, i myself have a son and a brother and nephews and i know how man/ young boys love to bribe about their encounters with woman. Also in the bio on Isabel i have read, there is no talk of sheets that were sent to spain. I believe she was a virgin, as educated as she was in all worldly things the girl had no clue what to do and i think the boy did not eather, but hey he could not say that he did not complete the deed. boys will be boys and if boys are proud on one thing, and especially on that age it is about their “crown jewels” and if that fails, its a problem for a boy,  so for Arthur to confess that he could not perform the deed (maybe because of ignorence or nervousity of just because the boy was not a healthy boy) should be a shame for him. It would make him the laughing stock, i have read that when Katherina told her ladies what did happen the ladies in waiting could not stop laughing about the boy, I mean come on ladies, we all know men and we know what sex means for them.

 

But again i want to make the point that in the education Katherine recieved from her mother, there certainly was no education on genitals on men or woman. Isabel was much to prudent for that sort of things. She was to chaste and was embarresed if anyone in her court behaved sensualy, that is why she was not that fond of Phillips the handsome when she met with him and his loose behavior, also she was shocked when she heard about her son's Juan obsession with sex with his newly wedded wife, she believed it was to much sex that killed Juan. She closed her eyes for the behaviour of Ferdinand but did he did it in great secresy (hope to spell that one right) and not in openess. So Catherina was in my eyes a virgin. No doubt about that.

August 16, 2011
3:04 pm
Avatar
Mya Elise
Ohio,US
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 781
Member Since:
May 16, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

You know how you tell a little lie and then later it becomes a huge deal? That's what i think happend.

Maybe Catherine thought that she'd do better in the world or make another good marriage if people thought she was a virgin, since it was of much value back then. And there would be no person to tell other wise because the only other person who would know would be Arthur and he died.

I think Catherine told the lie then when the questioning came around again, more seriously this time, she obviously thought that if she said it was consummated and that she had been lieing then Henry would surely have every right to divorce her and it would be pointless to fight against it. And it'd probably be worse for the Princess Mary. So therefore there was no way out, once the lie was told..there was no going back on it.

And i don't think Catherine a bad person to do this because God knows how many times i've done it.Wink I also think of this as merely a theory then an actual belief.

• Grumble all you like, this is how it’s going to be.

August 17, 2011
1:06 am
Avatar
Elliemarianna
Corsham, Wiltshire
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 316
Member Since:
June 7, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I don't think she was a virgin. She and Arthur were both young, and healthy(ish) at the time? I'm sure Arthur knew what to do, people always manage it somehow… sex is still instinctual… otherwise our species would not be here! She lied to her parents, about a pregnancy – so perhaps she wouldn't have trouble lying about something else? For the better of her country – in her eyes? She constantly punished herself for God, maybe that's why? She was making up for it?

I'm sure cavemen didn't need to draw sex education diagrams on cave walls for their 'coming of age' children…

"It is however but Justice, & my Duty to declre that this amiable Woman was entirely innocent of the Crimes with which she was accused, of which her Beauty, her Elegance, & her Sprightliness were sufficient proofs..." Jane Austen.

August 26, 2011
1:45 pm
Avatar
WilesWales
Winter Haven, Florida
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 96
Member Since:
August 22, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I have to agree with Kellly. This is the most accurate and concise way of making a long article in a scholarly journal into a posting I think I've seen yet. Thank you!

"This is the Lord's doing; it is marvellous in our eyes." Psalms 118:23

August 22, 2014
4:39 am
Avatar
Anyanka
La Belle Province
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2333
Member Since:
November 18, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Hannele said

Actually, Catherine’s virginity could have been examined by “wise women” before she married Henry, but unfortunately to her, that was not done. However, Henry believed her to be a virgin in the wedding night.

true..she could have been examined any time after the death of Arthur. . At Arthur’s death, there was no-one who expected Kaherine to be a virgin, the thought was put a couple to bed and the deed will be done. for several months folowing her untimely widow-hood , there were hoes that she may yet be caring a post-houmous child.

In any case, the consummation of her marriage with Arthur would have been no cause to Pope not to give the licence to marry Henry, as demonstrated the case of the sisters. So, Catherine had no cause to tell the what you call “the small lie” in the beginning.

One of the Papal Bulls issued for the HVIII/KoA marriage mentioned that consummtion of the earlier marriage wasn’t a problem under canon law.

It's always bunnies.

August 26, 2014
1:43 pm
Avatar
LadyPrincess
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 63
Member Since:
February 22, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I think that KOA could not in good faith agree to a divorce with Henry. If she did then it was like admitting defeat and as the daughter of Ferdinand and Isabella it just wasn’t in her nature to cower. Also it would be like she was admitting that her whole marriage and role as Queen wasn’t worth anything. I also think that she loved Henry and believed that he would take her back.

“How haps it, Governor, yesterday my Lady Princess, and today but my Lady Elizabeth?"- Elizabeth I

August 26, 2014
4:12 pm
Avatar
Boleyn
Kent.
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2285
Member Since:
January 3, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

It’s a difficult one to judge really whether or not K.O.A was a virgin, but I do find it strange that when H7 decided it would be better all round by and large to betroth Henry to K.O.A, that the Pope issued 2 dispensations to allow the marriage to take place.. In short they were contradictary. 1 dispensation took it for granted that Arthur’s marriage to K.O.A had been consumated whilst the other said it hadn’t.. I actually wonder if that was a tactic by H7 used as a rudimentary medievel form of a get out of marriage free card. H7 allowed the betrothal to go ahead but was all the while on the look out for a better and more profitable marriage for H Junior. If that dream became a reality for H7 he would have used the first dispenpensation to back out of the betrothal. As we know H7 did make H. Junior call into doubt his betrothal with K.O.A a few years after the betrothal, did anything come of that? and more to the point why did H7 make H Junior call it into doubt?
I actually wonder how H.Junior felt about being betrothed K.O.A. Junior wasn’t stupid even though he was only about 11 or 12 when he was told he was to marry K.O.A. Margeret Beaufort saw to it that Junior was well schooled in religious studies, it was said that he attended mass up to 7 times a day and probably in between times read the bible, so he would have been well versed about the Leviticus diatribe even then. In anycase somewhere in the bible there is another passage that says it is the duty of a man to marry his brothers wife so that the bloodline of his brother can continue, or some such fiddle faddle.
The bible anyway is very contradictary in it’s views, I’m not knocking it, for it does bring comfort to many people.
It’s just that when Junior became king in 1509 he would have been very aware of the morals and ethics of what marriage to K.O.A would have meant. If K.O.A was a virgin as she vehemently maintained during the divorce/annulment proceedings then Leviticus has apsolutely no role to play in the whole case. If she wasn’t then the passage (I forget where exactly) stating that it was expected for a man to marry his dead brothers wife also plays no part in the case because she maintained that she was virgin and therefore had done nothing wrong in the eyes of biblical law. H8 whole case as far as I can tell was solely based on the fact that he was desperate for a male child and used the bedroom gossip and snickering from over 20 years before to form the case.
As we know gossip and hearsay is inadmissible in court these days, a court case is based solely on facts and figures, things that can be proved not what is assumed (Dinosaur has a lovely saying about the word assume, “you should never assume anything because it makes an ASS out of U and ME”) and to be honest that is exactly what H8 did, he made a complete ass out of himself. Another thing that blows the “not virgin” crap out of the water with H8 is because of the length of time he was married to K.O.A. If he had brought his so called doubts about the validity of the marriage in 1512 (alledgely the first time his conscious bit his backside about the marriage) the Pope may have listened to his arguement with a little more attention, and perhaps may have agreed that the marriage was invalid and therefore agreed to annul it, but to not bring/voice these doubts until 1527 15 years after the first teeth marks in fat boy’s bum appeared is without doubt a urine take.

The length of time they were married in my opinion rendered their marriage legal anyway. The whole world saw K.O.A as Henry’s wife and Queen, and then suddenly Henry was telling the world “Whoops I may a mistake here Katherine isn’t my wife she’s my wh*re and has been since 1509” that isn’t just insulting it’s very humiliating. Although the humiliation bit is Henry’s, he’s admitting he’s a wh*remonger and a gigelo of sorts. The insult bit does fall on K.O.A as Henry had insulted her by calling her his wh*re. I don’t blame K.O.A in the least for digging her heels in. A strong and determined woman who wasn’t going to allow a fat bastard to push her around. Her stubborn pride about the whole divorce/annulment matter in a way was to try and protect not just her daughter’s rights etc, but also to try a protect Henry’s honour in a way, by calling K.O.A a wh*re he had as I said called himself a wh*remonger and a gigelo. By maintaining she was his true and lawful wife and getting the Pope to enforce that view she not only saved her own reputation but his too. If Henry had backed down and given up on Anne when K.O.A died in 1536 Henry’s reputation at least would have some street cred in the marriage market of the europeon courts, even if he had married J.S, at her death there would perhaps been a bit of a wider choice of euro brides to choose from. Not knocking A.O.C because I feel that if he had given his marriage a chance with her, they may have been quite happy, and there could have been a possibly of a Duke of York and a few spares, but I do feel that Cromwell chose the her because Cleves was a little known province in Germany and perhaps knew next to nothing about the court affairs in England. Certainly we know that Anne was let’s say not exactly enammored by Henry. Basically he was a stinky fat bastard, with a dicky leg and maybe a non working dicky too.

Anyway I digress (Nothing new) I do feel that K.O.A and Arthur had some form of sexual contact with each other, whether that was an attempt at penetrive sex, that didn’t work out too well or just very heavy petting I don’t know, but I think she possibily was a virgin when she married Henry, after all he would have known if she was a virgin or not when they were put to bed on their wedding night.
There is a rumour that Arthur and Katherines bed sheets had blood on them the morning after their wedding night.
I believe she explained that away when it was brought up at the blackfriars trial that she had pricked her heel and smeared blood on the sheets to confirm that she and Arthur had consumated their union. That kind of backs up my theory about the form of sexual contact, Arthur perhaps felt a little embarrassed that he hadn’t been able to do his duty that night and she pricked her hell etc to spare the ridicule he might have got if anyone found out that he couldn’t perform.

Semper Fidelis, quod sum quod

August 26, 2014
6:34 pm
Avatar
Sharon
Binghamton, NY
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2114
Member Since:
February 24, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

The first papal dispensation said that they may have had sex or may not have. The word used was “perhaps”. Isabel didn’t like that one, and when she was ill, near death, the pope sent her a papal brief with a dispensation which was to be followed by a Bull, saying Katherine and Arthur did not have sexual relations. This is the one that was in Spain and Katherine secretly sent for it during the annulment proceedings.
If one verse of the Bible didn’t suit, another could be found that worked. This is what Henry did. He claimed Leviticus said he shouldn’t marry his brother’s wife and Deuteronomy, which I think was originally used for the annulment, said he should marry her.
Wolsey made up the bed sheet thing in a fit of anger. There were many lies being said about this first marriage at the time.
Katherine didn’t testify at Blackfriars. Other than the wonderful speech she gave while on her knees before her husband, she said nothing else. When she was done, she got up and walked out, never to return.

August 26, 2014
9:39 pm
Avatar
Boleyn
Kent.
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2285
Member Since:
January 3, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I have to admit Katherine’s speech at Blackfrairs was an apsolute wonderful piece of theatre. She is more or less saying to Henry “prove to the whole world I was not a virgin when you married me?” How could he say she wasn’t a virgin without humiliating himself.
Had he actually had a sexual relationship prior to marrying K.O.A and if he had, he would have to explain what gave him the impression that K.O.A wasn’t a virgin in short he would have had to explained why or how she felt different to a previous paramour when he first had sex with her. If he hadn’t and I suspect that he probably hadn’t given how his father and Grandmother kept him very closely confined before he came to the throne.
He may have had the odd dabble fumble as in touching a woman up, but i’m guessing he might just have bragged that he had dabble when in fact he hadn’t, just to make himself look like the real man in front of his pals… If that was the case then he too was a virgin on his wedding night with K.O.A, so he had no basis of comparrison in which to explain why he felt K.O.A wasn’t a virgin…
K.O.A’s blackfriars speech put the tin hat on Henry’s whole case/reasoning for the divorce/annulment, and made Henry look a complete tit.
Well done old girl.

Semper Fidelis, quod sum quod

August 26, 2014
9:48 pm
Avatar
Boleyn
Kent.
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2285
Member Since:
January 3, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Hannele said

Boleyn said Another thing that blows the “not virgin” crap out of the water with H8 is because of the length of time he was married to K.O.A. If he had brought his so called doubts about the validity of the marriage in 1512 (alledgely the first time his conscious bit his backside about the marriage) the Pope may have listened to his arguement with a little more attention, and perhaps may have agreed that the marriage was invalid and therefore agreed to annul it, but to not bring/voice these doubts until 1527 15 years after the first teeth marks in fat boy’s bum appeared is without doubt a urine take.

That had nothing to do with the Pope’s decision. It was not unusual for him to let the kings or nobles to divorce, and it was usually quite easy to find (f.ex. pre-contract). But the Pope was influenced by Emperor, Catherine’s nephew.

True, but I was thinking without K.O.A nephew putting his beak in. Again he may have agreed to Henry’s plan, but I think it would take a lot more to convince him than gossip that was over 20 years old.. Henry could have course bribed him, that was always a sure way of perhaps getting the decision he wanted. It didn’t always work mind you…

Semper Fidelis, quod sum quod

August 27, 2014
7:52 am
Avatar
Boleyn
Kent.
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2285
Member Since:
January 3, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Thank you Aud, the laughable case that Henry presented to the court to rid himself of K.O.A just boils down to one thing at the end of the day. It’s Hogwash..The Leviticus text states something like “If a man should marry his brother’s wife, it is an unclean thing for he has uncovered his brother’s nakedness and they will be childless” He took that entire text and changed it’s meaning to fit what he felt were the facts. To him the whole childless bit meant “no son”. If Mary had died at birth or in infancy then Henry would have had a better chance of perhaps of making his case believable, but even then I think it might have been a little bit on a sticky wicket, as there had been union between Henry and K.O.A it wasn’t her fault or his fault either that as K.O.A put it “By me you have had divers (many) children, although it has pleased God to call them out of this world” that sentence says it all there had been issue between them so they weren’t childless. Mary was very much alive, she may have been a girl but what was wrong with that? She could have given Henry a Grandson (and a few spares just in case) to rule after him. Henry could have married Mary to a man of his own choosing and been happy with a grandson or 2 or 3 to bounce on his knee.
I think the biblical translation actually means that the “brothers wife” would never become pregnant (God had punished them and rendered her infertile) K.O.A became pregnant many times, so therefore she proved that she was fecund, (fertile) the babies may have been lost, either at birth or shortly after or by miscarriage before term, but that was just one of those things back then, it was no-ones fault it just happened.
Child mortality rates were extremely high anyway didn’t matter who you were or how rich you were. Woman were expected to get pregnant as soon as they were able and continue to have babies until they either died themselves or were too old to have anymore. The more babies you had the more chance there was that at least 2 or 3 might make it through to adulthood.
It wasn’t uncommon for a woman to have her first baby at around the age of about 14 or 15, there were some who had them a little earlier Margaret Beaufort was alledgely 13 when she had Henry Tulip who as we know became H7. However the trauma of his birth at such a young age was difficult I believe and she nearly died as a result, which also resulted in her never being able to have further children.

Semper Fidelis, quod sum quod

August 27, 2014
12:35 pm
Avatar
Boleyn
Kent.
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2285
Member Since:
January 3, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

This is why I said Henry could choose a suitable husband for Mary. Henry would have known that the English wouldn’t stomach a foriegn match for Mary, despite what K.O.A would have wanted for her.. I think she always hoped that Mary would marry Charles that way she could still have a link to her childhood in Spain via Mary. There were many English men of suitable rank to choose from at that time, as Henry hadn’t started to chop them up at that time, save for the Duke of Buckingham, he had already been chopped up.. After all Henry’s sister Mary was happily married to an English man. So when Mary was of marriable age which she was in 1528/9 she could have been married off to a suitable English men and could have possibily had a grandson in the royal cradle by 1531/2.
In the 1972 film of Henry 8th and his six wives, there is a scene in it where Anne says, “The Lady Mary should be married to a private Gentleman” In real life, Henry should have taken that advice and married Mary to an English gentle man. I still feel that the divorce with Katherine would have gone through and that all that happened afterwards would have happened, as Henry like many others felt that a woman ruler was no good. That in my opinion is Ballcocks, and Katherine proved that quite abley with Flodden when Henry went on his pub crawl around France.
But at least with Mary married to an English Gentleman after Edward’s death there would have been a possible Grandson or 2 to rule instead of her and Elizabeth.

Semper Fidelis, quod sum quod

August 27, 2014
5:11 pm
Avatar
LadyPrincess
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 63
Member Since:
February 22, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Great post Aud, Welcome to the forum by the way!

This brings me to why was Henry so forgiving of that scoundrel Brandon for marrying Mary? Brandon produced heirs that were rivals to the throne!

“How haps it, Governor, yesterday my Lady Princess, and today but my Lady Elizabeth?"- Elizabeth I

August 27, 2014
6:47 pm
Avatar
LadyPrincess
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 63
Member Since:
February 22, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

You’re right. Plus Henry did get to keep Mary’s jewels from France.

Charles wrote to Wolsey when he went to France and explained that Francis expressed Mary’s desire to marry him (Brandon) and Wolsey helped him by calming down Henry and to see the advangtages. Then Brandon betrayed Wolsey during the divorce proceedings!

“How haps it, Governor, yesterday my Lady Princess, and today but my Lady Elizabeth?"- Elizabeth I

August 27, 2014
6:58 pm
Avatar
Anyanka
La Belle Province
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2333
Member Since:
November 18, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Boleyn said

It wasn’t uncommon for a woman to have her first baby at around the age of about 14 or 15, there were some who had them a little earlier Margaret Beaufort was alledgely 13 when she had Henry Tulip who as we know became H7. However the trauma of his birth at such a young age was difficult I believe and she nearly died as a result, which also resulted in her never being able to have further children.

It was only commonish amongst high ranking families to marry and reproduce young.

Your average craftsman had to be a journey-man before he could contemplate marriage making him in his early to mid twenties. Likewise ny male who needed to set up a career in law or as a merchant was in his 20’s too. Pre-teen girls tended to help out at home and in the family business while older girls or rather women often worked outside the home bringing in valuble extra money or goods. Young couples of the lower classes have historically tended to wait for finacial security before marriage.

It's always bunnies.

August 28, 2014
4:18 pm
Avatar
Boleyn
Kent.
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2285
Member Since:
January 3, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Hannele said

Boleyn said

This is why I said Henry could choose a suitable husband for Mary. Henry would have known that the English wouldn’t stomach a foriegn match for Mary, despite what K.O.A would have wanted for her.. I think she always hoped that Mary would marry Charles that way she could still have a link to her childhood in Spain via Mary. There were many English men of suitable rank to choose from at that time, as Henry hadn’t started to chop them up at that time, save for the Duke of Buckingham, he had already been chopped up.. After all Henry’s sister Mary was happily married to an English man. So when Mary was of marriable age which she was in 1528/9 she could have been married off to a suitable English men and could have possibily had a grandson in the royal cradle by 1531/2.
In the 1972 film of Henry 8th and his six wives, there is a scene in it where Anne says, “The Lady Mary should be married to a private Gentleman” In real life, Henry should have taken that advice and married Mary to an English gentle man. I still feel that the divorce with Katherine would have gone through and that all that happened afterwards would have happened, as Henry like many others felt that a woman ruler was no good. That in my opinion is Ballcocks, and Katherine proved that quite abley with Flodden when Henry went on his pub crawl around France.
But at least with Mary married to an English Gentleman after Edward’s death there would have been a possible Grandson or 2 to rule instead of her and Elizabeth.

Normally the purpose of royal marriages was, besides to get a heir, to create foreign alliances. Such were the first marriages of Henry’s sisters, Margaret and Mary to kings of Scotland and France. It was only after as widows they married beneath their status, Margaret with two Scottish earls and Mary with duke of Suffolk (in haste without Henry’s permission knowing that he would not give it if asked beforehand).

Marrying a subject was not without dangers as it created jealousy among other families in equal rank. Later in Scotland the turmoil was such that Mary Stuart had to flee to England.

Also, when Henry VII married off younger sisters of his wife Elizabeth of York and their cousin Margaret (countess of Salisbury) he clearly tried to
chose men who were loyal and whose rank was not so high that their children could not become a threat – and yet he failed (or so it at least seemed to Henry VIII).

All in all, marrying off Mary was not an easy task. One psychological reason was perhaps that Henry was unwilling to admit that he was no more young – a father of a young child seems young, a grandfather seems old.

This is true Hannell, but Aud makes a very good point too (Good One Aud) It is because of Henry’s narrow minded and obsessive view of fathering a son, that he forgot that the Tudor dynasty bloodline still had a back up plan. We all know that Henry had an abborence at the idea of a foriegn ruler being allowed, being within prodding room of him with a shitty stick, let alone sat of the royal potty with his daughter, after he was chucked on the compost heap, but this view was a very selfish view. he wasn’t thinking of anything let alone the Tudor bloodline, he just wanted a son, to actually not so much continue the bloodline, but to prove that his actions towards K.O.A were fully justified. it was a kind of game of oneupmanship with him. After Edward was born he was so caught up in the fact that he now had his little boy he once forget everything else. He’d got his son “Yay lets all put the flags out and throw our tin hats in the air”
He took it completely forgranted that 1 children can die. and 2 that Jane would die she had given him one son so there were going to be others. It was just a matter of waiting the obligrity 6 weeks and then it would be party time in the bedroom again. When Jane died it hit home just how fragile human life actually was, but he still simply refused to see the wood for the trees, he had got his son and nothing else mattered. After he had perhaps had time to think about it, when Henry decided to get shot of K.O.A, Anne was already lined up for his next victim, when Anne betrayed him (his thoughts) he already had Jane lined up for his next victim. After her death he realised perhaps for the first time in his life he was truly alone, and that the whole Tudor dynasty on the shoulders of one child, when in fact if he had been thinking straight it rested on 3 children and one of them was of marriageable age (although Mary would have been considered old by Tudor standards) and as I said could have married her to an English gentleman etc. But instead of that he went into ultra panic mode and said “I’ve got to get more sons and fast” I don’t think Anne of Cleves was actually a bad choice for Henry, but he didn’t see it that way. I do think however it was good that they became quite affable towards one another and she certainly didn’t suffer as his other wives did although it did cost her, her German family which perhaps wasn’t such a bad thing if the rumours are to believed of her home life in Germany being not exactly pleasent. K.H was chosen for his next victim purely on the basis that 1 she was young and pretty and had many years of childbirth in front of her so more chances to get a son or 2 or even 3 in the nursery. 2 because once again Henry was playing the old I’m better than you game with Francois. Francois was if my lousy memory serves (wherever it is at the moment, as it’s buggered off AGAIN!!!!!) was married to Eleanor of Spain, the sister of the Holy Roman Emperor, so his marriage to K.H was to prove that he still had what it took and was sexy enough to pull the birds and was also drawing a direct comparrison to the fact that Francois was stuck with an ugly old Spanish bag, a marriage which I believe came about through a political allience to prevent France from poking it’s beak in to Spanish terretory. Henry didn’t need to make political matches to prevent threats to his country, he could marry anyone he wished. When his marriage to K.H bit the headman’s axe, apart from being made like a laughing stock all over England, he opened himself to no end of ridicule from the rest of the world. King Francois I believe wrote a letter to Henry to say how sorry he was “to hear of the wanton and naughty behaviour of the Queen” a letter that made Henry go and give the French ambassador a good clobbering to for bringing it to him” I think he realised he had seriously screwed up in not allowing Mary to marry sooner, if he had married her say in 1533 to a suitable english man she could have theorecially had 4 children and maybe more in the royal nursery and as I said a couple of them may have been boys. If we take that as a for instance, when Edward died in 1553 one of Mary boys could have been about 18 and could have taken the throne and thus continued the Tudor line. He could have married her to someone in 1542 after K.H date with the axe man but a child or to me precise a boy would be still be a child when Henry and Edward died, and child rulers were as much to be feared as woman were as rulers. Plus the fact Mary would be considered for regent so in affect she would rule anyway. So he would have or rather England would have had the 2 things they feared the most a child and a woman regent. He would have seen and known exactly how troublesome that had been as his sister Margaret had been regent for her son Jimbo 5th after Flodden and that wasn’t a very happy time at all for the Scottish people. Her re-marriage was perhaps the saving grace for Scotland at that time, as the regency council used it as an excuse to get shot of her.
I don’t believe that Henry married K.P in a hope to procreate I think he realised that it would be unlikely that would happen given that in the 2 years of his marriage to K.H there was no hint of a preganacy, and certainly that due to K.H’s prior marriages there was no hint of her ever being preganant. His marriage to K.P was really just so that he wouldn’t die alone, and to be honest I think his conscious deeply troubled him that K.O.A had done just that. I do feel that perhaps in the last few months of his life he realised just how good a wife K.O.A had been to him, despite his unwavering belief that she wasn’t truly his wife in the first place, and her lack to produce the son he so wanted proved that.

Semper Fidelis, quod sum quod

Forum Timezone: Europe/London
Most Users Ever Online: 214
Currently Online:
Guest(s) 1
Top Posters:
Anyanka: 2333
Boleyn: 2285
Sharon: 2114
Bella44: 933
DuchessofBrittany: 846
Mya Elise: 781
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1
Members: 425962
Moderators: 0
Admins: 1
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 13
Topics: 1679
Posts: 22775
Newest Members:
selenasw60, amaliaqy60, RobertRam, FredTip, judithqp18, Brandontouts
Administrators: Claire: 958